FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225687742> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225687742 endingPage "687" @default.
• W4225687742 startingPage "680" @default.
• W4225687742 abstract "Abstract Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly promoted for use in routine orthopaedic care with the expectation that if they are made available during encounters, they will be incorporated into clinical practice. We investigated an initiative in which PROMs were systematically collected and provided via the electronic health record but were infrequently used. Questions/purposes In a qualitative study, we asked: (1) Why are PROM results not being used in clinical care when they are available to surgeons? (2) What aspects of PROMs are seen as useful for clinical care? (3) How are PROMs generally perceived by surgeons and orthopaedic leaders? Methods A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted in a single health system in an urban setting using semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of orthopaedic surgeons and leaders who would have substantial knowledge of and experience with the organization’s PROM system, which was embedded in the electronic health record and developed for use in clinical care but was not being used. We included surgeons whose practices consisted of at least 90% patients with osteoarthritis, including surgical and nonsurgical management, and thus their patients would be completing PROMs surveys, or surgeons who were leaders in one of the three orthopaedic divisions in the health plan. The senior research manager for orthopaedics identified 14 potential participants meeting these criteria, 11 of whom agreed to study participation. Participants included nine surgeons and two orthopaedic leaders; the majority were men, with a median of 13 years of clinical practice. Study interviews were conducted by an experienced interviewer not known to participants, in private conference rooms in the healthcare setting, and a median (range) of 27 minutes (16 to 40) in length. A content analysis approach was employed for data analysis, with thematic inductive saturation reached in the analysis and attention to trustworthiness and rigor during the analytic process. Results Interviewees reported that PROM scores are not being used in patient clinical care because of logistical barriers, such as access and display issues and the time required, and perceptual barriers, such as concerns about patient understanding and the validity and reliability of measures. Surgeons preferred talking with patients about the personal outcomes patients had identified as important; most patients preferred to assess progress toward their own goals than PROMs scores for other people. Surgeons also identified changes that could facilitate PROM use and reduce barriers in clinical care, including pushing PROM scores to physicians’ inboxes, developing inserts for physician notes, using easy-to-understand graphical displays, and engaging patients about PROMs earlier in the care process. Participants all agreed that PROMs in aggregate use are valuable for the organization, department, and individual surgeons, but individual patient scores are not. Conclusion Despite the availability of PROMs, there are important barriers to incorporating and using PROMs in clinical care. Providing access to PROM scores without clearly understanding how and why surgeons may consider using or incorporating them into their clinical practice can result in expensive and underused systems that add little value for the clinician, patient, or organization. Clinical Relevance Involving front-line orthopaedic surgeons and leaders in shaping the design and structure of PROM systems is important for use in clinical care, but these interviewees seemed to see aggregate data as more valuable than individual patient scores." @default.
• W4225687742 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5001791376 @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5061192721 @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5067563376 @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5071028687 @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5071259009 @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5081067039 @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5090649926 @default.
• W4225687742 creator A5091847715 @default.
• W4225687742 date "2021-11-30" @default.
• W4225687742 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4225687742 title "What Do Orthopaedists Believe is Needed for Incorporating Patient-reported Outcome Measures into Clinical Care? A Qualitative Study" @default.
• W4225687742 cites W1986961452 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2006982948 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2013102148 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2069206457 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2084728935 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2138456319 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2142225512 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2149103558 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2160563079 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2183734852 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2267259681 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2303533551 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2321797768 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2334838968 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2499801133 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2560106011 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2565573535 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2570626043 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2614069560 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2626947701 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2732573701 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2769123513 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2789375854 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2790534819 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2807771173 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2811388790 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2885381858 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2889300239 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2894826729 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2901315345 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2910581027 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2948659393 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2950635403 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2965099227 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2979580544 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W2979652222 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W3112318707 @default.
• W4225687742 cites W34119901 @default.
• W4225687742 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002059" @default.
• W4225687742 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34846308" @default.
• W4225687742 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4225687742 type Work @default.
• W4225687742 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W4225687742 countsByYear W42256877422022 @default.
• W4225687742 countsByYear W42256877422023 @default.
• W4225687742 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5001791376 @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5061192721 @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5067563376 @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5071028687 @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5071259009 @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5081067039 @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5090649926 @default.
• W4225687742 hasAuthorship W4225687742A5091847715 @default.
• W4225687742 hasBestOaLocation W42256877421 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C2777364248 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C2779517570 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C131872663 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C141071460 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C144024400 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C159110408 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C160735492 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C162324750 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C17744445 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C1862650 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C190248442 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C199539241 @default.
• W4225687742 hasConceptScore W4225687742C2777364248 @default.

• next