FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225767205> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225767205 endingPage "261" @default.
• W4225767205 startingPage "261" @default.
• W4225767205 abstract "<ns3:p><ns3:bold>Background: </ns3:bold>Self-etching has been shown to be beneficial compared to the other resin sealants especially in pediatric practice. The present <ns3:italic>in-vivo</ns3:italic> study was designed to clinically evaluate the sealing ability and retention of the self-etching sealant compared to the conventional resin sealant. The aim was to evaluate and compare the retention and marginal integrity of the self-etch and acid etch sealant materials at three, six and twelve-month follow up.</ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods: </ns3:bold>The study was designed as a double blinded, split mouth randomized controlled trial, . In total, 35 children (70 teeth) between 7 and 10 years of age formed part of the study. Group 1 received acid-etch sealant and Group 2 received self-etch sealants. The study participants and the investigator who performed the statistical analysis were blinded to the treatment allocation. All the samples were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. The inter-group and intragroup comparison were carried out using the Chi-Square test and Friedman test with level of significance set at 5% and the P value less than 0.05.</ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results: </ns3:bold>Complete retention of sealants was observed in 34.5% of conventional acid etch (group 1) and 22.9% of self-etch samples (group 2) whereas complete loss of sealants were seen in 11.4% of group 1 and 20% of the group 2 samples and intergroup comparison of retention failure was non-significant (p=0.135). In total, 85.7% of the group 1 and 82.9% of the group 2 samples exhibited good marginal integrity with no clinical changes in the enamel around the margins but this was not statistically significant (p=0.5).</ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusions: </ns3:bold>Sealants with fewer procedural steps and those which provide adequate retention would be ideal for use in children. Thus, self-etch sealants have been found to be effective and efficient as a sealant in the present <ns3:italic>in-vivo</ns3:italic> study.</ns3:p><ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Clinical Trials Registry, India registration:</ns3:bold> CTRI/2019/03/018343 (29/03/2019).</ns3:p>" @default.
• W4225767205 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4225767205 creator A5012625604 @default.
• W4225767205 creator A5043586764 @default.
• W4225767205 creator A5062274683 @default.
• W4225767205 creator A5073493514 @default.
• W4225767205 date "2022-04-19" @default.
• W4225767205 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4225767205 title "Comparison of clinical effectiveness of conventional and self-etch sealant: a split mouth randomized controlled trial" @default.
• W4225767205 cites W1988034457 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W200436642 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2024072268 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2057140935 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2058834052 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2061649555 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2126497824 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2156868484 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2741425763 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2766458767 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2807348670 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W2947374103 @default.
• W4225767205 cites W4247903468 @default.
• W4225767205 doi "https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109584.3" @default.
• W4225767205 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4225767205 type Work @default.
• W4225767205 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4225767205 countsByYear W42257672052023 @default.
• W4225767205 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225767205 hasAuthorship W4225767205A5012625604 @default.
• W4225767205 hasAuthorship W4225767205A5043586764 @default.
• W4225767205 hasAuthorship W4225767205A5062274683 @default.
• W4225767205 hasAuthorship W4225767205A5073493514 @default.
• W4225767205 hasBestOaLocation W42257672051 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C2775883587 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C2991825924 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C65409693 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C126322002 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C141071460 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C159985019 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C168563851 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C192562407 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C199343813 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C2775883587 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C2991825924 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C65409693 @default.
• W4225767205 hasConceptScore W4225767205C71924100 @default.
• W4225767205 hasLocation W42257672051 @default.
• W4225767205 hasLocation W42257672052 @default.
• W4225767205 hasOpenAccess W4225767205 @default.
• W4225767205 hasPrimaryLocation W42257672051 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W139551723 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W178471848 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W193029347 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W2022391157 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W2076741095 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W2370618556 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W2563189698 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W295508753 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W3210186174 @default.
• W4225767205 hasRelatedWork W34992401 @default.
• W4225767205 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W4225767205 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4225767205 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4225767205 workType "article" @default.