FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225838086> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225838086 abstract "Human genomics research is growing rapidly. More effective methods are required for co-design and involving people, especially those sub-populations which are inherently high interest to medical research and thus at greater risk of being exploited. This case study documents how we worked with a large group of donor-conceived siblings who share the same sperm donor father, to explore how they might want to engage with and influence any future genomic research.A participatory action research process was used to explore the views of a group of 18 people who knew they are donor-conceived siblings. They are part of a larger group of up to 1000 people who share the same sperm donor father but the only ones in contact with each other; it is likely that many of the uncontacted siblings are unaware of their biological father, have been unable to trace others or have died. The discussion explored views about how the group would like to be involved in future research. Five members participated in co-design; 12 completed a pre-discussion online survey; and six participated in an online discussion forum and evaluation survey. The online discussion was led by one facilitator, supported by the study team.Of the 18 siblings approached in 2018, 14 participated in the co-design stages or the surveys and online discussion. Co-design informed the research process. Participants reported enjoying the overall experience of the surveys and discussion forum, which were perceived as inclusive and flexible. Most participants' views regarding the value of involvement in research changed during the process, and 'widened' about who should be involved. Participants were supportive of future research being done with the siblings group. All who completed the final survey requested to remain part of the co-design process. Other themes in the online discussion included concerns about conflicting interests and a desire for research participation to improve the situation for people affected by assisted conception. The process informed later discussions in the sibling group about participating in a self-managed biobank and informed decision making about participating in genomics research.Findings from this study help inform ways in which people from certain sub-populations can be involved in planning and defining their participation in genomic research, particularly those that are inherently high interest to medical research and thus at greater risk of exploitation. This process provides a replicable method of involving potential participants in co-designing genomics research using online discussions, with positive outcomes. Reporting this study using 'Standardised data on initiatives (STARDIT)' to report the process allows comparison with other studies.Human genomics research is growing rapidly. There is evidence that involving potential participants and the public in co-designing research can improve the quality, recruitment and acceptability of the research. However, more evidence about effective methods for involving people is required, especially those in sub-populations who are inherently high interest to researchers and thus with a higher risk of being exploited by medical researchers. In this study, we worked with a large group of donor-conceived siblings who were conceived from the same sperm donor. We sought their views regarding participation in possible future research. We co-designed a way of involving them in discussion about their own “terms of engagement” with research. Online discussions gave group members an opportunity to share their views, and take initial steps towards developing their own research governance model. We used the ‘Standardised Data on Initiatives (STARDIT)’ Alpha Version to report involvement, allowing findings to be compared with other studies. Group members who participated reported enjoying the experience and identified some advantages to online discussions over other methods, including time to reflect on answers and learn collectively. Most participants’ preferences about who should be involved in research design ‘widened’ to include more people. Participants’ learning from the process also informed subsequent discussions in the sibling group about participation in research, including about how to make informed decisions about participating. Involving people in this way has the potential for a ‘transformative learning’ impact, where people’s perspectives and attitudes change as a result of being involved. This is particularly important for people in populations at greater risk of being exploited including under-represented sub-populations who are of high interest to genomic researchers." @default.
• W4225838086 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4225838086 creator A5001292564 @default.
• W4225838086 creator A5018544239 @default.
• W4225838086 creator A5059502476 @default.
• W4225838086 date "2021-12-01" @default.
• W4225838086 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4225838086 title "Co-designing genomics research with a large group of donor-conceived siblings" @default.
• W4225838086 cites W1805065172 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W1837452863 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W1965308868 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W1973359477 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W1983981789 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2005606081 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2007874121 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2021930613 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2052492394 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2055983952 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2073034718 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2087074240 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2110383815 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2112939849 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2113258979 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2124759683 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2133674686 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2161013171 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2331393505 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2539114824 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2564891325 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2592377283 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2604542916 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2736211339 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2739751169 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2751217079 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2912360213 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2936197328 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2941496369 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W2943556053 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3022588589 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3032905042 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3046092183 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3046991394 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3107294582 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3120108871 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3123732438 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3126254436 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3128487190 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3174691902 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W3198880780 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W4206738178 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W4210585234 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W4242413440 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W4247640774 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W4255853643 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W4300009529 @default.
• W4225838086 cites W81685006 @default.
• W4225838086 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00325-7" @default.
• W4225838086 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34915936" @default.
• W4225838086 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4225838086 type Work @default.
• W4225838086 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4225838086 countsByYear W42258380862022 @default.
• W4225838086 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225838086 hasAuthorship W4225838086A5001292564 @default.
• W4225838086 hasAuthorship W4225838086A5018544239 @default.
• W4225838086 hasAuthorship W4225838086A5059502476 @default.
• W4225838086 hasBestOaLocation W42258380861 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C140988679 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C2776831358 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C140988679 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C144024400 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C15744967 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C19165224 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C2776831358 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C509550671 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C71924100 @default.
• W4225838086 hasConceptScore W4225838086C77805123 @default.
• W4225838086 hasFunder F4320320577 @default.
• W4225838086 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4225838086 hasLocation W42258380861 @default.
• W4225838086 hasLocation W42258380862 @default.
• W4225838086 hasLocation W42258380863 @default.
• W4225838086 hasLocation W42258380864 @default.
• W4225838086 hasLocation W42258380865 @default.
• W4225838086 hasOpenAccess W4225838086 @default.
• W4225838086 hasPrimaryLocation W42258380861 @default.
• W4225838086 hasRelatedWork W1607564568 @default.
• W4225838086 hasRelatedWork W2000355793 @default.
• W4225838086 hasRelatedWork W2000457688 @default.
• W4225838086 hasRelatedWork W2317046562 @default.
• W4225838086 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4225838086 hasRelatedWork W2755079455 @default.
• W4225838086 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.

• next