Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225974499> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4225974499 endingPage "120187" @default.
- W4225974499 startingPage "120187" @default.
- W4225974499 abstract "Populations of large herbivores, including members of the deer family Cervidae, are expanding across and within many regions of the northern hemisphere. Because their browsing on trees can result in economic losses to forestry and strongly affect ecosystems, it is becoming increasingly important to understand how best to mitigate resultant damage. Previous research has highlighted the importance of regulating deer density and the availability of alternative forage to reduce browsing damage levels in conifer production stands. However, often only one or two proxies of forage availability have been used instead of applying a broad foodscape approach and more knowledge is needed to understand which types of alternative forage best mitigate damage. We conducted field inventories of damage that occurred during the previous fall/winter in 112 production stands in southern Sweden, while also measuring forage availability and cervid faecal pellets in the surrounding landscape (16 ha). Local landowners provided data on supplementary feeding. We found that variation in cervid (Alces alces, Capreolus capreolus, Cervus elaphus and Dama dama) browsing damage to top shoots or stems of young Scots pine trees (Pinus sylvestris, hereon pine), was better explained by the availability of alternative natural forage (using several indices and species of trees and shrubs) than by supplementary feeding. The proportion of damaged pine trees was higher in stands with a lower density of pine stems; in landscapes with a lower density of key broadleaf tree species (genera Sorbus, Salix, Populus and Quercus); and in landscapes with more open land (agricultural fields and paddocks). Damage was also higher in stands where relatively large amounts of moose faeces was found, while not related to the amount of faeces from other cervid species. The amount of supplementary feed (silage or other types such as root vegetables) did not explain variation in pine damage, but the result was possibly affected by relatively few study areas supplying sufficient data on supplementary feeding. The results from our inventory illustrate the efficacy of using naturally growing forage to mitigate browsing damage to young pine trees in managed landscapes. Creation of such forage is also recommended over supplementary feeding because of co-benefits to forest biodiversity and ecosystem services." @default.
- W4225974499 created "2022-05-05" @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5000984838 @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5008678053 @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5016695021 @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5039580300 @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5053229975 @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5059360902 @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5061881761 @default.
- W4225974499 creator A5087151014 @default.
- W4225974499 date "2022-06-01" @default.
- W4225974499 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4225974499 title "Forage availability, supplementary feed and ungulate density: Associations with ungulate damage in pine production forests" @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1523097550 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1551097446 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1880545031 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1917435979 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1963805631 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1991800639 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1992609119 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W1997732638 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2002835867 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2003522285 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2004429670 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2008877450 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2013845301 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2020237060 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2021893213 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2022171848 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2028610324 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2041643845 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2042892596 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2061454463 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2066736471 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2077132421 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2081920623 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2088743990 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2094375921 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2094624712 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2098857466 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2099857942 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2110576684 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2112879612 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2112950372 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2116104385 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2120783295 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2125793898 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2126891096 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2133681478 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2136957775 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2147265650 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2160113988 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2188763553 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2330719473 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2471540249 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2554281554 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2622633234 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2740821397 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2766411723 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2786358356 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2794729179 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2803700051 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2805287756 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2810784845 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2949180992 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2973836298 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W2976120864 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3004848349 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3018640448 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3036034531 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3041793856 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3087322603 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3100564686 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3103076024 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W3183578645 @default.
- W4225974499 cites W4205176851 @default.
- W4225974499 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120187" @default.
- W4225974499 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4225974499 type Work @default.
- W4225974499 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W4225974499 countsByYear W42259744992022 @default.
- W4225974499 countsByYear W42259744992023 @default.
- W4225974499 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5000984838 @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5008678053 @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5016695021 @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5039580300 @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5053229975 @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5059360902 @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5061881761 @default.
- W4225974499 hasAuthorship W4225974499A5087151014 @default.
- W4225974499 hasBestOaLocation W42259744991 @default.
- W4225974499 hasConcept C128758860 @default.
- W4225974499 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
- W4225974499 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W4225974499 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W4225974499 hasConcept C2778208748 @default.
- W4225974499 hasConcept C2778226015 @default.