Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4226157753> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 98 of
98
with 100 items per page.
- W4226157753 endingPage "16" @default.
- W4226157753 startingPage "9" @default.
- W4226157753 abstract "The assessment of health-related quality of life (hrQoL) may need to be reconsidered due to important differences between efficacy (the effect of a treatment under experimental study conditions) and effectiveness (the effect of a treatment under real-world conditions). We presume that most researchers intend to describe effects under real-world conditions when investigating hrQoL as an endpoint. Unfortunately, most studies are designed to confirm two theories: the efficacy of a new intervention under experimental study conditions and the real-world effectiveness of this intervention on hrQoL under non-experimental study conditions. Conflicting information emerges when the outcomes are supposed to describe effects under real-world conditions, but the assessment generates results obtained under experimental conditions. This paper examines the existing conflict between efficacy and effectiveness in a sample of 100 studies investigating hrQoL.We analysed a sample of freely available publications of clinical studies listed in PubMed between April 2015 and August 2016 which assessed quality of life as an outcome. We assessed the following four characteristics that should differ in studies measuring either efficacy or effectiveness: 1) specification of the study as a randomised controlled trial or not, 2) description of the study design as pragmatic or not, 3) classification of the study as an efficacy or an effectiveness study and 4) number of selected inclusion and exclusion criteria.91% of the studies assessed hrQoL under experimental conditions (in a randomised controlled trial), but not under real-world conditions. The important difference between efficacy and effectiveness was not described in 60% of the studies. Only 6% of studies classified the study as a pragmatic trial. The difference between inclusion and exclusion criteria was not addressed in any of the investigated studies.The results of the four criteria confirmed our hypothesis that hrQoL studies are conducted mainly as experimental, but not pragmatic, trials indicating that the meaningfulness of the important difference between efficacy and effectiveness requires further discussion.pragmatic trial, experimental study conditions, real-world conditions, efficacy, effectiveness, pragmatic." @default.
- W4226157753 created "2022-05-05" @default.
- W4226157753 creator A5017798149 @default.
- W4226157753 creator A5034275545 @default.
- W4226157753 date "2022-04-01" @default.
- W4226157753 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4226157753 title "Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life in Randomised Controlled Trials: Expected and Reported Results Do Not Match" @default.
- W4226157753 cites W1912909488 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W1965926642 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W1999019570 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2031065729 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2039104184 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2060624955 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2118008749 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2120278737 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2126130217 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2161749376 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2163223903 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2172862186 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2188536794 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2314261856 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2327778341 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2407933427 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2414358862 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2473217441 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2512756824 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2772224433 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2904563186 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2951537042 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2964899106 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2993861400 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W3111792535 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W4200445982 @default.
- W4226157753 cites W2444166139 @default.
- W4226157753 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/por.s350165" @default.
- W4226157753 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35431592" @default.
- W4226157753 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4226157753 type Work @default.
- W4226157753 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4226157753 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4226157753 hasAuthorship W4226157753A5017798149 @default.
- W4226157753 hasAuthorship W4226157753A5034275545 @default.
- W4226157753 hasBestOaLocation W42261577531 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C2777596629 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C3019006561 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C105795698 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C118552586 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C126322002 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C129848803 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C142724271 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C159110408 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C168563851 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C1862650 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C204787440 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C2777596629 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C2779134260 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C2779951463 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C2780665704 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C3019006561 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C33923547 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C535046627 @default.
- W4226157753 hasConceptScore W4226157753C71924100 @default.
- W4226157753 hasLocation W42261577531 @default.
- W4226157753 hasLocation W42261577532 @default.
- W4226157753 hasLocation W42261577533 @default.
- W4226157753 hasOpenAccess W4226157753 @default.
- W4226157753 hasPrimaryLocation W42261577531 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W1569663381 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W1988122194 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W1997239045 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W2040878127 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W2348182769 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W2354407060 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W2392823988 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W2973108776 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W3199468163 @default.
- W4226157753 hasRelatedWork W4245524627 @default.
- W4226157753 hasVolume "Volume 13" @default.
- W4226157753 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4226157753 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4226157753 workType "article" @default.