FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4226277132> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4226277132 endingPage "712" @default.
• W4226277132 startingPage "704" @default.
• W4226277132 abstract "Lumbar discectomy is a frequently performed procedure to treat sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. Multiple surgical techniques are available, and the popularity of minimally invasive surgical techniques is increasing worldwide. Clinical outcomes between these techniques may not show any substantial differences. As lumbar discectomy is an elective procedure, patients' own preferences play an important role in determining the procedure they will undergo. The aims of the current study were to determine the relative preference weights patients apply to various attributes of lumbar discectomy, determine if patient preferences change after surgery, identify preference heterogeneity for choosing surgery for sciatica, and calculate patient willingness to pay for other attributes.A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. A questionnaire was administered to patients before they underwent surgery and to an independent sample of patients who had already undergone surgery. The DCE required patients to choose between two surgical techniques or to opt out from 12 choice sets with alternating characteristic levels: waiting time for surgery, out-of-pocket costs, size of the scar, need of general anesthesia, need for hospitalization, effect on leg pain, and duration of the recovery period.A total of 287 patients were included in the DCE analysis. All attributes, except scar size, had a significant influence on the overall preferences of patients. The effect on leg pain was the most important characteristic in the decision for a surgical procedure (by 44.8%). The potential out-of-pocket costs for the procedure (28.8%), the wait time (12.8%), need for general anesthesia (7.5%), need for hospitalization (4.3%), and the recovery period (1.8%) followed. Preferences were independent of the scores on patient-reported outcome measures and baseline characteristics. Three latent classes could be identified with specific preference patterns. Willingness-to-pay was the highest for effectiveness on leg pain, with patients willing to pay €3133 for a treatment that has a 90% effectiveness instead of 70%.Effect on leg pain is the most important factor for patients in deciding to undergo surgery for sciatica. Not all proposed advantages of minimally invasive spine surgery (e.g., size of the scar, no need of general anesthesia) are necessarily perceived as advantages by patients. Spine surgeons should propose surgical techniques for sciatica, not only based on own ability and proposed eligibility, but also based on patient preferences as is part of shared decision making." @default.
• W4226277132 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4226277132 creator A5007711014 @default.
• W4226277132 creator A5031852718 @default.
• W4226277132 creator A5039922180 @default.
• W4226277132 creator A5049170792 @default.
• W4226277132 creator A5070883918 @default.
• W4226277132 creator A5088299283 @default.
• W4226277132 creator A5090490801 @default.
• W4226277132 date "2022-05-01" @default.
• W4226277132 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4226277132 title "Patient preferences for treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a discrete choice experiment" @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2014733101 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2016114707 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2019734962 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2028029232 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2032869670 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2053732113 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2060663061 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2159936838 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2167759796 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2257312944 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2263961629 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2341182588 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2700625472 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2971588028 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W2995215155 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W3113030399 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W3193755445 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W4236983011 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W4243249491 @default.
• W4226277132 cites W4254398715 @default.
• W4226277132 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.8.spine21995" @default.
• W4226277132 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34826818" @default.
• W4226277132 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4226277132 type Work @default.
• W4226277132 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W4226277132 countsByYear W42262771322022 @default.
• W4226277132 countsByYear W42262771322023 @default.
• W4226277132 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4226277132 hasAuthorship W4226277132A5007711014 @default.
• W4226277132 hasAuthorship W4226277132A5031852718 @default.
• W4226277132 hasAuthorship W4226277132A5039922180 @default.
• W4226277132 hasAuthorship W4226277132A5049170792 @default.
• W4226277132 hasAuthorship W4226277132A5070883918 @default.
• W4226277132 hasAuthorship W4226277132A5088299283 @default.
• W4226277132 hasAuthorship W4226277132A5090490801 @default.
• W4226277132 hasBestOaLocation W42262771321 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C2776008035 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C2776698514 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C2992636618 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C141071460 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C142724271 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C162324750 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C175444787 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C1862650 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C204787440 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C2776008035 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C2776698514 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C2780907711 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C2781249084 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C2992636618 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C44575665 @default.
• W4226277132 hasConceptScore W4226277132C71924100 @default.
• W4226277132 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4226277132 hasLocation W42262771321 @default.
• W4226277132 hasLocation W42262771322 @default.
• W4226277132 hasLocation W42262771323 @default.
• W4226277132 hasLocation W42262771324 @default.
• W4226277132 hasOpenAccess W4226277132 @default.
• W4226277132 hasPrimaryLocation W42262771321 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W1992928012 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W1998056352 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W2091221032 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W2918574239 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W2941914697 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W2952141502 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W3104505365 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W3106665868 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W3200316987 @default.
• W4226277132 hasRelatedWork W4253558698 @default.
• W4226277132 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W4226277132 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4226277132 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4226277132 workType "article" @default.