FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4226383456> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4226383456 endingPage "257" @default.
• W4226383456 startingPage "245" @default.
• W4226383456 abstract "Crashes at rural intersections are frequently a result of failure to yield. As a result, agencies attempt to find countermeasures that encourage drivers to stop and yield appropriately. A number of countermeasures have been utilized to reduce crashes and improve intersection safety. However, some treatments have been shown to have mixed results, while for others only limited information about effectiveness is available. Because even low-cost treatments require some maintenance, it is important for agencies to have good information about the effectiveness of the various treatments before investments are made. Stop sign beacons are one such low-cost measure. This paper discusses results of research which evaluated stop sign beacons. Stop sign beacons were installed at 10 stop-controlled approaches in the US state of Iowa. The beacons were set to activate only when an approaching driver was traveling over a set speed threshold which was set based on whether a driver would be able to stop. Video data were collected before, at 1-month, and at 12-month after installation. Type of stop (i.e., rolling, no-stop), stop location in reference to the stop bar, and location of initial brake application were reduced from the video data. The percentage of drivers who began braking before or after 350 feet were compared. This threshold indicates the point at which drivers would need to engage in hard braking based on approach speed and stopping sight distance. At one month, 6 of the 9 intersections experienced an increase in the percentage of vehicles braking at 350 feet or before. At 12-month, drivers at more than half of the approaches were braking sooner than the before period. Results also indicate stopping behavior improved after installation of the beacons. Most of the approaches (70%) showed an increase in the percentage of drivers who came to a full stop at 1-month compared to the period before installation. At 12-month, 71% of approaches showed an increase in drivers who came to a complete stop. Similar results were found for stopping location. Around 80% of approaches experienced an increase in the percentage of vehicle that stopped at or before the stop bar at the 1-month period after installation and 86% of approaches had an increase at 12-month." @default.
• W4226383456 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4226383456 creator A5010874509 @default.
• W4226383456 creator A5026305103 @default.
• W4226383456 creator A5046054521 @default.
• W4226383456 creator A5051268319 @default.
• W4226383456 creator A5057653333 @default.
• W4226383456 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4226383456 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4226383456 title "Evaluation of Driver Behavior in Response to Stop Sign Beacons" @default.
• W4226383456 doi "https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2022.122015" @default.
• W4226383456 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4226383456 type Work @default.
• W4226383456 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4226383456 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4226383456 hasAuthorship W4226383456A5010874509 @default.
• W4226383456 hasAuthorship W4226383456A5026305103 @default.
• W4226383456 hasAuthorship W4226383456A5046054521 @default.
• W4226383456 hasAuthorship W4226383456A5051268319 @default.
• W4226383456 hasAuthorship W4226383456A5057653333 @default.
• W4226383456 hasBestOaLocation W42263834561 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C102168758 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C139676723 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C1517167 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C171146098 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C22212356 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C2780999251 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C44154836 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C64543145 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C102168758 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C121332964 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C127413603 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C1276947 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C134306372 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C139676723 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C1517167 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C171146098 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C22212356 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C2780999251 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C33923547 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C41008148 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C44154836 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C64543145 @default.
• W4226383456 hasConceptScore W4226383456C76155785 @default.
• W4226383456 hasIssue "02" @default.
• W4226383456 hasLocation W42263834561 @default.
• W4226383456 hasOpenAccess W4226383456 @default.
• W4226383456 hasPrimaryLocation W42263834561 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2350015430 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2351120199 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2363495409 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2364623519 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2364759972 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2370588366 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2374510772 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2379114042 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2390599065 @default.
• W4226383456 hasRelatedWork W2763961110 @default.
• W4226383456 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W4226383456 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4226383456 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4226383456 workType "article" @default.