FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4226502784> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4226502784 endingPage "960" @default.
• W4226502784 startingPage "956" @default.
• W4226502784 abstract "BACKGROUND Chest computed tomography (CT) scans are important for the management of rib fracture patients, especially when determining indications for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs). Chest CTs describe the number, patterns, and severity of rib fracture displacement, driving patient management and SSRF indications. Literature is scarce comparing radiologist versus surgeon rib fracture description. We hypothesize there is significant discrepancy between how radiologists and surgeons describe rib fractures. METHODS This was an institutional review board–approved, retrospective study conducted at a Level I academic center from December 2016 to December 2017. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) suffering rib fractures with a CT chest where included. Basic demographics were obtained. Outcomes included the difference between radiologist versus surgeon description of rib fractures and differences in the number of fractures identified. Rib fracture description was based on current literature: 1, nondisplaced; 2, minimally displaced (<50% rib width); 3, severely displaced (≥50% rib width); 4, bicortically displaced; 5, other. Descriptive analysis was used for demographics and paired t test for statistical analysis. Significance was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS Four hundred and ten patients and 2,337 rib fractures were analyzed. Average age was 55.6(±20.6); 70.5% were male; median Injury Severity Score was 16 (interquartile range, 9–22) and chest Abbreviated Injury Scale score was 3 (interquartile range, 3–3). For all descriptive categories, radiologists consistently underappreciated the severity of rib fracture displacement compared with surgeon assessment and severity of displacement was not mentioned for 35% of rib fractures. The mean score provided by the radiologist was 1.58 (±0.63) versus 1.78 (±0.51) by the surgeon ( p < 0.001). Radiologists missed 138 (5.9%) rib fractures on initial CT. The sensitivity of the radiologist to identify a severely displaced rib fracture was 54.9% with specificity of 79.9%. CONCLUSION Discrepancy exists between radiologist and surgeon regarding rib fracture description on chest CT as radiologists routinely underappreciate fracture severity. Surgeons need to evaluate CT scans themselves to appropriately decide management strategies and SSRF indications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic/Diagnostic Test, level III." @default.
• W4226502784 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5034741139 @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5052153708 @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5052517273 @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5057898718 @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5064400492 @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5066520045 @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5071200462 @default.
• W4226502784 creator A5076819641 @default.
• W4226502784 date "2021-08-18" @default.
• W4226502784 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4226502784 title "Discrepancies in rib fracture severity between radiologist and surgeon: A retrospective review" @default.
• W4226502784 cites W105858801 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W1602659143 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W1862243980 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W1984981910 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W1987298263 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W1999828550 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2009085894 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2012208696 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2020353710 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2021208597 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2022378767 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2024384638 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2035526122 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2049819706 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2050709806 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2053879607 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2067733510 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2077529527 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2093187636 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2104572878 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2121895757 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2123049001 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2131331364 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2171272131 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2416737106 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2515443351 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2559198425 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2567430512 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2571326272 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2586555845 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2592736044 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2735058199 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2749240101 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2884924530 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2938426920 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2946163639 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2946945890 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W2993019695 @default.
• W4226502784 cites W4320301268 @default.
• W4226502784 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000003377" @default.
• W4226502784 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34407008" @default.
• W4226502784 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4226502784 type Work @default.
• W4226502784 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4226502784 countsByYear W42265027842022 @default.
• W4226502784 countsByYear W42265027842023 @default.
• W4226502784 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5034741139 @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5052153708 @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5052517273 @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5057898718 @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5064400492 @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5066520045 @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5071200462 @default.
• W4226502784 hasAuthorship W4226502784A5076819641 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C107551265 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C119060515 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C2776567890 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConcept C85004164 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C107551265 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C119060515 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C126838900 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C141071460 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C144024400 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C149923435 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C15744967 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C167135981 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C190385971 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C194828623 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C2776567890 @default.
• W4226502784 hasConceptScore W4226502784C2780084366 @default.

• next