FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4229378038> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4229378038 endingPage "S212" @default.
• W4229378038 startingPage "S211" @default.
• W4229378038 abstract "ABSTRACT Background Research globally confirmed the lack of screening for sexual dysfunction in routine consultations by primary care doctors. Various barriers to sexual history taking were identified, such as differences in age, sex, and culture. Doctors justified the lack of sexual history taking also on their lack of knowledge and skill. As sexual wellbeing also influences the quality of life, patients want to talk to doctors about their sexual health needs but are often shy, or they fear they will embarrass their doctors. Unfortunately, they also find that their complaints are often ignored. Aim The aim of the study was to observe and describe the patient-doctor interaction dynamics of routine consultations in primary health care settings in North-West province South Africa, to improve sexual history taking. Methods The study design was a grounded theory approach. One hundred and fifty-one consecutive consultations with adult patients at risk of sexual dysfunction due to diabetes and hypertension, were video recorded. All the doctors working at 10 primary care facilities were recruited. Doctor-patient interactions were recorded during a normal working day using a discreet camera and laptop. Following the consultations, patients completed demographic questionnaires and sexual dysfunction questionnaires (IIEF and FSFI). After completion of consultation and patient data collection, doctors completed a vignette study with hypothetical scenarios. At the end of the recordings, doctors reflected on their consultations and sexual history taking. Analysis entailed open coding followed by focused and verbatim coding using MaxQDA 2018 software. Some information was quantified using descriptive statistics and Fischer Exact test for associations. Results No history taking for sexual dysfunction took place. Ninety-four percent of the 81 sexually active women had sexual dysfunction symptoms and only 2% of 48 men reported no erectile dysfunction. One patient presented with pain after sexual intercourse. There was no evidence of help seeking for sexual challenges which could be contributed to low education, passive, or low engagement in the health setting or the disconnect between doctors and patients. Patients wanted receptive doctors to ask about their sexual health, whilst doctors expected patients to tell. Doctors admitted that they did not even think about sexual dysfunction and did not consider it a priority. A vignette study with hypothetical scenarios showed that the doctors’ clinical reasoning was generally poor and did not incorporate sexual functioning as a differential diagnosis. The consultations revealed inadequate communication and consultation skill competence. The patient-doctor interaction was doctor centered. Doctors and patients blamed an influx of patients and long waiting times for sub-standard consultations. Consultation time was lost on poorly organized patient files and laboratory results that were retrieved on the doctors’ personal mobile phones. Conclusion Sexual history was inhibited by patient, doctor, and health system factors. Although sexual history is an integral part of comprehensive history taking during a routine consultation, patient-doctor-system engagement need to change to facilitate sexual history taking. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no." @default.
• W4229378038 created "2022-05-10" @default.
• W4229378038 creator A5008812590 @default.
• W4229378038 creator A5010293350 @default.
• W4229378038 creator A5013572589 @default.
• W4229378038 date "2022-05-01" @default.
• W4229378038 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4229378038 title "226 Complexity of Sexual History Taking in Patients with Diabetes and Hypertension in Routine Primary Care Consultations in South Africa" @default.
• W4229378038 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.03.482" @default.
• W4229378038 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4229378038 type Work @default.
• W4229378038 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4229378038 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4229378038 hasAuthorship W4229378038A5008812590 @default.
• W4229378038 hasAuthorship W4229378038A5010293350 @default.
• W4229378038 hasAuthorship W4229378038A5013572589 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C121752807 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C179518139 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C206179267 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C2778093883 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C2781179581 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C2994102814 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C9719361 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C105795698 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C118552586 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C121752807 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C126322002 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C126838900 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C15744967 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C179518139 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C206179267 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C2778093883 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C2781179581 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C2908647359 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C2994102814 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C33923547 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C512399662 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C71924100 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C77805123 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C9719361 @default.
• W4229378038 hasConceptScore W4229378038C99454951 @default.
• W4229378038 hasIssue "Supplement_2" @default.
• W4229378038 hasLocation W42293780381 @default.
• W4229378038 hasOpenAccess W4229378038 @default.
• W4229378038 hasPrimaryLocation W42293780381 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W1973599691 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W2046523764 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W2047503707 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W2068426528 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W2147858160 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W2151225139 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W2590891791 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W4229378038 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W4252900798 @default.
• W4229378038 hasRelatedWork W1830394397 @default.
• W4229378038 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W4229378038 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4229378038 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4229378038 workType "article" @default.