FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4230147480> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4230147480 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Patient portals have been introduced in many countries over the last 10 years, but many health information managers still feel they have too little knowledge of patient portals. A taxonomy can help them to better compare and select portals. This has led us to develop the TOPCOP taxonomy for classifying and comparing patient portals. However, the taxonomy has not been evaluated by users. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to evaluate the taxonomy’s usefulness to support health information managers in comparing, classifying, defining a requirement profile for, and selecting patient portals and to improve the taxonomy where needed. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We used a modified Delphi approach. We sampled a heterogeneous panel of 13 health information managers from 3 countries using the criterion sampling strategy. We conducted 4 anonymous survey rounds with qualitative and quantitative questions. In round 1, the panelists assessed the appropriateness of each dimension, and we collected new ideas to improve the dimensions. In rounds 2 and 3, the panelists iteratively evaluated the taxonomy that was revised based on round 1. In round 4, the panelists assessed the need for a taxonomy and the appropriateness of patient engagement as a distinguishing concept. Then, they compared 2 real portals with the final taxonomy and evaluated its usefulness for comparing portals, creating an initial requirement profile, and selecting patient portals. To determine group consensus, we applied the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The final taxonomy consists of 25 dimensions with 65 characteristics. Five new dimensions were added to the original taxonomy, with 8 characteristics added to already existing dimensions. Group consensus was achieved on the need for such a taxonomy to compare portals, on patient engagement as an appropriate distinguishing concept, and on the comprehensibility of the taxonomy’s form. Further, consensus was achieved on the taxonomy’s usefulness for classifying and comparing portals, assisting users in better understanding portals, creating a requirement profile, and selecting portals. This allowed us to test the usefulness of the final taxonomy with the intended users. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The TOPCOP taxonomy aims to support health information managers in comparing and selecting patient portals. By providing a standardized terminology to describe various aspects of patient portals independent of clinical setting or country, the taxonomy will also be useful for advancing research and evaluation of patient portals. </sec>" @default.
• W4230147480 created "2022-05-11" @default.
• W4230147480 creator A5051829067 @default.
• W4230147480 creator A5070176396 @default.
• W4230147480 date "2021-05-25" @default.
• W4230147480 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4230147480 title "Improvement and Evaluation of the TOPCOP Taxonomy of Patient Portals: Taxonomy-Evaluation-Delphi (TED) Approach (Preprint)" @default.
• W4230147480 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.30701" @default.
• W4230147480 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4230147480 type Work @default.
• W4230147480 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4230147480 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4230147480 hasAuthorship W4230147480A5051829067 @default.
• W4230147480 hasAuthorship W4230147480A5070176396 @default.
• W4230147480 hasBestOaLocation W42301474802 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C2779495148 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C58642233 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C60641444 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C111919701 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C136764020 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C154945302 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C23123220 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C2522767166 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C2779495148 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C41008148 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C56739046 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C58642233 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C59822182 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C60641444 @default.
• W4230147480 hasConceptScore W4230147480C86803240 @default.
• W4230147480 hasLocation W42301474801 @default.
• W4230147480 hasLocation W42301474802 @default.
• W4230147480 hasOpenAccess W4230147480 @default.
• W4230147480 hasPrimaryLocation W42301474801 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W115658 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W14133584 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W2180906 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W5424071 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W6420160 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W669799 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W810749 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W8950634 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W9051423 @default.
• W4230147480 hasRelatedWork W13633152 @default.
• W4230147480 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4230147480 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4230147480 workType "article" @default.