FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4230462431> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4230462431 abstract "Hallux valgus is classified as an abnormal deviation of the great toe (hallux) towards the midline of the foot.To identify and evaluate the evidence from randomised trials of interventions used to correct hallux valgus.We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group trials register (2003/1), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2003) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2003). No language restrictions were applied. Hand searching of specific foot journals was also undertaken. Date of the most recent search: 31st March 2003.Randomised or quasi-randomised trials of both conservative and surgical treatments of hallux valgus. Excluded were studies comparing areas of surgery not specific to the control of the deformity such as use of anaesthetics or tourniquet placement.Methodological quality of trials which met the inclusion criteria was independently assessed by two reviewers. Data extraction was undertaken by two reviewers. The trials were grouped according to the interventions being compared, but the dissimilarity in the comparisons prevented pooling of results.The methodological quality of the 21 included trials was generally poor and trial sizes were small. Three trials involving 332 participants evaluated conservative treatments versus no treatment. There was no evidence of a difference in outcomes between treatment and no treatment. One good quality trial involving 140 participants compared surgery to conservative treatment. Evidence was shown of an improvement in all outcomes in patients receiving chevron osteotomy compared with those receiving orthoses. The same trial also compared surgery to no treatment in 140 participants. Evidence was shown of an improvement in all outcomes in patients receiving chevron osteotomy compared with those receiving no treatment. Two trials involving 133 people with hallux valgus compared Keller's arthroplasty with other surgical techniques. In general, there was no advantage or disadvantage using Keller's over the other techniques. When the distal osteotomy was compared to Keller's arthroplasty, the osteotomy showed evidence of improving the intermetatarsal angle and preserving joint range of motion. The arthroplasty was found to have less of an impact on walking ability compared to the arthrodesis. Six trials involving 309 participants compared chevron (and chevron-type) osteotomy with other techniques. The chevron osteotomy offered no advantages in these trials. For some outcomes, other techniques gave better results. Two of these trials (94 participants) compared a type of proximal osteotomy to a proximal chevron osteotomy and found no evidence of a difference in outcomes between techniques. Three trials involving 157 participants compared outcomes between original operations and surgeon's adaptations. There was no advantage found for any of the adaptations. Three trials involving 71 people with hallux valgus compared new methods of fixation to traditional methods. There was no evidence that the new methods of fixation were detrimental to the outcome of the patients. Four trials involving 162 participants evaluated methods of post-operative rehabilitation. The use of continuous passive motion appeared to give an improved range of motion and earlier recovery following surgery. Early weightbearing or the use of a crepe bandage were not found to be detrimental to final outcome.Only a few studies had considered conservative treatments. The evidence from these suggested that orthoses and night splints did not appear to be any more beneficial in improving outcomes than no treatment. Surgery (chevron osteotomy) was shown to be beneficial compared to orthoses or no treatment, but when compared to other osteotomies, no technique was shown to be superior to any other. Only one trial had compared an osteotomy to an arthroplasty. There was limited evidence to suggest that the osteotomy gat the osteotomy gave the better outcomes. It was notable that the numbers of participants in some trials remaining dissatisfied at follow-up were consistently high (25 to 33%), even when the hallux valgus angle and pain had improved. A few of the more recent trials used assessment scores that combine several aspects of the patients outcomes. These scoring systems are useful to the clinician when comparing techniques but are of dubious relevance to the patient if they do not address their main concern and such scoring systems are frequently unvalidated. Only one study simply asked the patient if they were better than before the treatment. Final outcomes were most frequently measured at one year, with a few trials maintaining follow-up for 3 years. Such time-scales are minimal given that the patients will be on their feet for at least another 20-30 years after treatment. Future research should include patient-focused outcomes, standardised assessment criteria and longer surveillance periods, more usefully in the region of 5-10 years." @default.
• W4230462431 created "2022-05-11" @default.
• W4230462431 creator A5057564376 @default.
• W4230462431 creator A5090050285 @default.
• W4230462431 creator A5090861006 @default.
• W4230462431 date "2004-01-26" @default.
• W4230462431 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4230462431 title "Interventions for treating hallux valgus (abductovalgus) and bunions" @default.
• W4230462431 cites W1540608446 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W1976853023 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W1984324608 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W1986892030 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W1993161485 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2015641899 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2015745252 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2023978253 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2032486094 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2033678041 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2038694817 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2042310324 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2046337851 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2081310033 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2082034933 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2082342902 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2098963902 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2100400782 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2102871712 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2134490763 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2136616531 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2148953408 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2261278344 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2268250028 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2272050160 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2276105919 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2284856733 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2316223217 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2328707850 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2983077904 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2988817733 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W4231961219 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W4248666949 @default.
• W4230462431 cites W2055509804 @default.
• W4230462431 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000964.pub2" @default.
• W4230462431 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14973960" @default.
• W4230462431 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W4230462431 type Work @default.
• W4230462431 citedByCount "51" @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312012 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312013 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312014 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312015 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312016 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312017 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312018 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312020 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312021 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312022 @default.
• W4230462431 countsByYear W42304624312023 @default.
• W4230462431 crossrefType "reference-entry" @default.
• W4230462431 hasAuthorship W4230462431A5057564376 @default.
• W4230462431 hasAuthorship W4230462431A5090050285 @default.
• W4230462431 hasAuthorship W4230462431A5090861006 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C118552586 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C126322002 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C141071460 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C168563851 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C17744445 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C1862650 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C199539241 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C27415008 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C2776478404 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C2779473830 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C2781017183 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C535046627 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C71924100 @default.
• W4230462431 hasConceptScore W4230462431C95190672 @default.
• W4230462431 hasLocation W42304624311 @default.
• W4230462431 hasLocation W42304624312 @default.
• W4230462431 hasOpenAccess W4230462431 @default.
• W4230462431 hasPrimaryLocation W42304624311 @default.
• W4230462431 hasRelatedWork W1967911880 @default.
• W4230462431 hasRelatedWork W2114297254 @default.
• W4230462431 hasRelatedWork W2759947093 @default.
• W4230462431 hasRelatedWork W3106603484 @default.
• W4230462431 hasRelatedWork W3118355974 @default.
• W4230462431 hasRelatedWork W3213074919 @default.

• next