FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4230909987> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4230909987 abstract "One of the central threads in the historical development of economic science since the 18th century is the search for ways to turn the economy into a discipline resembling natural science, to put it on a solid empirical foundation expressed in mathematical language completely devoid of subjectivity while it apprehends the laws of nature. The article reviews the epistemological history of economics as a discipline through confrontations between epistemic virtues (“moral certainty” and “mechanical objectivity”), research strategies (empiricism and mathematical rationality) and institutional status (science or art). In this regard, the authors analyze the transitions from understanding economics as a “moral science” through the marginalist and formalist revolutions to taking economics as a field for formal ontologies and abstract mathematical models and tools. They then focus on tracing economic theory’s consistent adherence to the epistemological standard of scientific knowledge which was set by classical mechanics — the historical core of science in the modern era — together with the costs incurred by mathematical presentation and rejection of the ideal of “moral certainty”. The authors show how the loss of the empirical component and the growing issue of the substantive component of formal models have resulted in the “empirical turn” in economics. Using the example of neuroeconomics as the most radical attempt to naturalize the subject matter of economics, they outline the modern attempts to saturate economic research with empirical content and return to the project of a “physicalist” economics that will discover the laws of nature as the natural sciences have done. The authors argue from the ambivalent nature of the purposes and results of neuroeconomics to show that the empirical path of neuroeconomics, which was adopted in order to link the formal concepts of neoclassical economic theory with the experimental data and material models of neuroscience, leads instead to further degradation of the subject matter of economics as social objects are replaced with their presumed material infrastructure (neurophysiological correlates of social facts) without solving the problem of the empirical foundation for economic theory." @default.
• W4230909987 created "2022-05-11" @default.
• W4230909987 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W4230909987 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4230909987 title "Naturalizing the Subject of Economics: From Following the Norms of Natural Science to Owning the Laws of Nature" @default.
• W4230909987 cites W1534948214 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W1989600405 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2048365946 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2050016768 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2082886835 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2084136439 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2170832403 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2323305873 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2510551179 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2512208795 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2792198974 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2915441556 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2938673425 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W3200992203 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W4241484147 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W635677156 @default.
• W4230909987 cites W2156982528 @default.
• W4230909987 doi "https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2020-3-21-50" @default.
• W4230909987 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4230909987 type Work @default.
• W4230909987 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4230909987 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C201717286 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C36790819 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C511723319 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C53691452 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConcept C7493553 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C111472728 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C118084267 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C138885662 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C144024400 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C161191863 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C162324750 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C201717286 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C2777855551 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C36289849 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C36790819 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C41008148 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C511723319 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C53691452 @default.
• W4230909987 hasConceptScore W4230909987C7493553 @default.
• W4230909987 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4230909987 hasLocation W42309099871 @default.
• W4230909987 hasOpenAccess W4230909987 @default.
• W4230909987 hasPrimaryLocation W42309099871 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W10618294 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W24541656 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W28735961 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W29847597 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W34561650 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W35711914 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W38523368 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W39079869 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W44957859 @default.
• W4230909987 hasRelatedWork W5094208 @default.
• W4230909987 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W4230909987 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4230909987 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4230909987 workType "article" @default.