FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4232916271> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4232916271 endingPage "198" @default.
• W4232916271 startingPage "155" @default.
• W4232916271 abstract "Jurisdiction — Dispute — ICSID Convention, Article 25(1) — Whether dispute was of a legal nature — Whether the dispute arose out of an investment — Whether the claim was premature Jurisdiction — Investment — Whether a foreign investor had standing to bring claims for damages suffered by the assets, investments and activities of its local subsidiary Procedure — Addition of a party — ICSID Convention, Article 25(2)(b) — ICSID Convention, Article 46 — Whether the local subsidiary of the claimant could be added as a party to the dispute — Whether the request for addition could be made by the claimant — Whether the claims of the local subsidiary needed to be different from those of the foreign parent Interpretation — World Trade Organization — International Monetary Fund — Whether the norms of multilateral economic institutions assisted in investment treaty interpretation Defence — Necessity — Exclusions and reservations — Public order — Essential security interests — Margin of appreciation — Customary international law — World Trade Organization — Whether the strict conditions of application for the plea of necessity under customary international law applied to the safeguard clause — Whether the economic crisis required the maintenance of public order or the protection of essential security interests — Whether the law of the World Trade Organization assisted in the interpretation of the defence — Whether the State had any reasonably available alternatives that were more compliant with its international obligations — Whether the State was barred by its own conduct from relying on the defence Defence — Necessity — ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Article 25 — Customary international law — Whether the defence under general international law was available in the alternative Free transfer — Interpretation — International Monetary Fund — Whether a currency transfer impeded by a bank freeze was related to an investment — Whether the provisions and principles of the International Monetary Fund assisted in interpretation of the investment treaty standard Fair and equitable treatment — Legal stability — Legitimate expectation — Taxation — Whether the expectation of stability in the exchange and currency regime was legitimate and protected by the BIT — Whether unilateral restructuring of governmental financial instruments was reasonable once the economic crisis had ended — Whether imposition of a capital tax on a nominal gain resulting from currency devaluation was in breach of fair and equitable treatment Expropriation — Indirect expropriation — Monetary sovereignty — Municipal law — Constitutional law — Taxation — Whether sovereign management of the 156 exchange rate could result in an indirect expropriation — Whether compulsory currency conversion was protected from expropriation under constitutional law — Whether constitutional court decisions were relevant — Whether a breach of constitutional law amounted to an expropriation under international investment law — Whether losses for payment delays could be considered an expropriation — Whether unilateral restructuring of governmental financial instruments was an expropriation — Whether imposition of a capital tax on a nominal gain resulting from currency devaluation was an expropriation Umbrella clause — Whether the State entered into any commitments with regard to investments — Whether the standard applied to contractual undertakings made to a local subsidiary — Whether domestic laws addressed to the general public created obligations specific to a foreign investor Remedies — Interest — Compound interest — Whether simple or compound interest should be awarded in the circumstances Annulment — Manifest excess of powers — Failure to state reasons — Serious departure from a fundamental rule of procedure — ICSID Convention, Article 52(1) — Whether the tribunal failed to decide the investor’s claim for loss after the state of necessity was over — Whether the tribunal failed to determine the investor’s expropriation claim in relation to unilateral restructuring of governmental financial instruments — Whether the tribunal failed in its construction of the scope of freedom of transfer — Whether the tribunal failed to explain why the State could no longer rely on the necessity defence — Whether the tribunal had awarded damages on a ground not invoked by the investor Annulment — Procedure — Whether an annulment committee may consider an additional ground on its own motion" @default.
• W4232916271 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4232916271 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W4232916271 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4232916271 title "Continental Casualty Company v. Argentine Republic" @default.
• W4232916271 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107447455.004" @default.
• W4232916271 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4232916271 type Work @default.
• W4232916271 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4232916271 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C185436325 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C2777381055 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C2779010840 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C2779921323 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C2780608745 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C144133560 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C155202549 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C17744445 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C185436325 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C199539241 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C2776949292 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C2777381055 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C2779010840 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C2779921323 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C2780608745 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C55447825 @default.
• W4232916271 hasConceptScore W4232916271C97460637 @default.
• W4232916271 hasLocation W42329162711 @default.
• W4232916271 hasOpenAccess W4232916271 @default.
• W4232916271 hasPrimaryLocation W42329162711 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W2113624018 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W2186072505 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W2477979451 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W2775814928 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W3011498530 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W3121133583 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W4238160580 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W4239449483 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W4248483778 @default.
• W4232916271 hasRelatedWork W566024301 @default.
• W4232916271 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W4232916271 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4232916271 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4232916271 workType "article" @default.