FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4234472783> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4234472783 endingPage "974" @default.
• W4234472783 startingPage "973" @default.
• W4234472783 abstract "We thank Shimizu et al for the helpful comments. We have read the article by Shimizu et al.1Shimizu Y. Yamamoto J. Kato M. et al.Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of early stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64: 255-259Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar We had performed endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for pharyngeal low-grade dysplasia (LGD), mainly for the following two reasons. The first is that the endoscopic diagnosis by means of the intraepithelial papillary capillary loop pattern and the histologic diagnosis might differ in some patients. Shimizu et al say that all LGDs showed a type IV pattern. However, Inoue et al2Inoue H. Minami H. Sato Y. et al.High-magnification endoscopic diagnosis of meso- and hypopharyngeal cancer [in Japanese with English abstract].Stomach and Intestine. 2010; 45: 217-226PubMed Google Scholar have reported that not all lesions with a type IV pattern were LGD. There had been no other reports on that point when we started the research. To confirm the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis, we carried out ESD to diagnose the lesions histologically. In the present study, 16 of 26 (62%) lesions with a type IV pattern were LGD, and the remaining 10 of 26 (38%) were high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (HGD/CIS). The second reason we performed ESD is that the adequate management strategy for pharyngeal LGD has not been established, as Shimizu et al mentioned in their letter. We think that our data are fundamental in establishing the strategy.Because we confirmed the diagnostic accuracy of the intraepithelial papillary capillary loop pattern and the histologic diagnosis in the present study, we had not performed ESD in patients with pharyngeal LGD since then. Now we can report that we have followed them up endoscopically every 6 to 12 months. We had endoscopically followed up 15 patients with pharyngeal LGD at the end of 2012. None of the lesions changed in size or appearance during a median period of 23.8 months. As Shimizu et al commented, we should establish the adequate management strategy for pharyngeal LGD. We would like to report detailed data on patients with pharyngeal LGD during a longer observation period in the near future. We thank Shimizu et al for the helpful comments. We have read the article by Shimizu et al.1Shimizu Y. Yamamoto J. Kato M. et al.Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of early stage hypopharyngeal carcinoma.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64: 255-259Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar We had performed endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for pharyngeal low-grade dysplasia (LGD), mainly for the following two reasons. The first is that the endoscopic diagnosis by means of the intraepithelial papillary capillary loop pattern and the histologic diagnosis might differ in some patients. Shimizu et al say that all LGDs showed a type IV pattern. However, Inoue et al2Inoue H. Minami H. Sato Y. et al.High-magnification endoscopic diagnosis of meso- and hypopharyngeal cancer [in Japanese with English abstract].Stomach and Intestine. 2010; 45: 217-226PubMed Google Scholar have reported that not all lesions with a type IV pattern were LGD. There had been no other reports on that point when we started the research. To confirm the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis, we carried out ESD to diagnose the lesions histologically. In the present study, 16 of 26 (62%) lesions with a type IV pattern were LGD, and the remaining 10 of 26 (38%) were high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (HGD/CIS). The second reason we performed ESD is that the adequate management strategy for pharyngeal LGD has not been established, as Shimizu et al mentioned in their letter. We think that our data are fundamental in establishing the strategy. Because we confirmed the diagnostic accuracy of the intraepithelial papillary capillary loop pattern and the histologic diagnosis in the present study, we had not performed ESD in patients with pharyngeal LGD since then. Now we can report that we have followed them up endoscopically every 6 to 12 months. We had endoscopically followed up 15 patients with pharyngeal LGD at the end of 2012. None of the lesions changed in size or appearance during a median period of 23.8 months. As Shimizu et al commented, we should establish the adequate management strategy for pharyngeal LGD. We would like to report detailed data on patients with pharyngeal LGD during a longer observation period in the near future. What is an adequate management strategy for pharyngeal low-grade dysplasia?Gastrointestinal EndoscopyVol. 77Issue 6PreviewWe have read with great interest the article by Kuwabara et al,1 who studied the clinical features of pharyngeal intraepithelial neoplasias and outcomes of treatment by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The authors performed ESD for patients with not only high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (HGD/CIS) but also low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and concluded that ESD appears to be an effective treatment for pharyngeal intraepithelial neoplasias. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W4234472783 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5000960910 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5002799579 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5004795432 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5027785421 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5040150118 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5040876838 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5044717743 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5070130847 @default.
• W4234472783 creator A5086850753 @default.
• W4234472783 date "2013-06-01" @default.
• W4234472783 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4234472783 title "Response" @default.
• W4234472783 cites W2005529574 @default.
• W4234472783 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.004" @default.
• W4234472783 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23684095" @default.
• W4234472783 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W4234472783 type Work @default.
• W4234472783 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4234472783 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5000960910 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5002799579 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5004795432 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5027785421 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5040150118 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5040876838 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5044717743 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5070130847 @default.
• W4234472783 hasAuthorship W4234472783A5086850753 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C2775894508 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C2777137803 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C2779534503 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C3020475014 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C4144372 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C121608353 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C126322002 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C141071460 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C142724271 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C2775894508 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C2776235491 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C2777137803 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C2778451229 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C2779534503 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C3020475014 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C31972630 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C41008148 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C4144372 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C61434518 @default.
• W4234472783 hasConceptScore W4234472783C71924100 @default.
• W4234472783 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4234472783 hasLocation W42344727831 @default.
• W4234472783 hasLocation W42344727832 @default.
• W4234472783 hasOpenAccess W4234472783 @default.
• W4234472783 hasPrimaryLocation W42344727831 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W125682947 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W1552530466 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W2005764467 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W2348539212 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W2408709477 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W2978620683 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W3030798949 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W3137488564 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W3150492015 @default.
• W4234472783 hasRelatedWork W3171892875 @default.
• W4234472783 hasVolume "77" @default.
• W4234472783 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4234472783 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4234472783 workType "article" @default.