Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4235509381> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W4235509381 endingPage "629e" @default.
- W4235509381 startingPage "628e" @default.
- W4235509381 abstract "Sir: We read with great interest the article by Rubi et al.1 They compared aesthetic outcome in 30 patients after primary breast augmentation. The outcome was rated, using frontal and oblique views, 12 weeks apart by the same set of observers who were blinded to the choice of breast implants. Patients whose nipple-to–inframammary fold distance was less than 4 cm were excluded from the study. The authors do not comment on patients’ chest dimensions, the information provided to the patients about the implants, or what prompted patients to choose an implant shape (e.g., online information, friends, or previous consultations). There is only one set of clinical photographs provided. In our experience,2,3 the final aesthetic outcome depends not only on the implant shape but also on the tissue distribution. In a patient with very thin tissue cover, the implant shape will determine the final breast shape. However, in a patient with good soft-tissue cover, the final shape is less dependant on the shape of the implant. This means that a certain subgroup of patients have a pleasing result with either implant shape. However, the converse is not true (i.e., every patient will not achieve an aesthetic result with an arbitrary choice of implant). This is especially true of patients with short nipple-to–inframammary fold distance, which were excluded in the study by Rubi et al. In our practice, this particular subgroup benefits the most from anatomical implants. It also must be remembered that aesthetic outcome is not the only guiding principle for choosing an implant, as the authors comment on the rotation rate of anatomical implants. The long-term studies have shown4 that the 10-year risk of complications is between two and three times higher with round implants, even from the same manufacturers. Most of these complications are attributable to an increased risk of capsular contracture and implant malposition. Some of the increased risk of capsular contracture may be explained by the presence of smooth implants in that cohort (the manufacturers did not specify complications of round implants based on their surface). However, that still does not account for the higher risk of malposition. We are not suggesting that one implant shape is always superior. We do indeed use round implants for primary (and secondary) aesthetic breast augmentation in the presence of certain indications.5 However, we feel that appearance alone cannot be the sole factor in choosing an implant. Instead, we recommend customizing the choice of implant to each individual patient’s body habitus and soft-tissue distribution. We urge caution in blanket interpretation of the results of this study. DISCLOSURE Dr. Cheema has no disclosures. Dr. Montemurro is a consultant and speaker for Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, Calif.). Dr. Hedén is a consultant and speaker for Allergan, Inc., and an unpaid consultant for Canfield Scientific (Fairfield, N.J.). Mubashir Cheema, F.R.C.S.(Plast.)Paolo Montemurro, M.D.Per Hedén, M.D., Ph.D.AkademiklinikenStockholm, Sweden" @default.
- W4235509381 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4235509381 creator A5002205534 @default.
- W4235509381 creator A5009670677 @default.
- W4235509381 creator A5069393217 @default.
- W4235509381 date "2017-10-01" @default.
- W4235509381 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W4235509381 title "Comparing Round and Anatomically Shaped Implants in Augmentation Mammaplasty" @default.
- W4235509381 cites W1759788859 @default.
- W4235509381 cites W2325168127 @default.
- W4235509381 cites W2563699572 @default.
- W4235509381 cites W4300132986 @default.
- W4235509381 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000003708" @default.
- W4235509381 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
- W4235509381 type Work @default.
- W4235509381 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4235509381 countsByYear W42355093812020 @default.
- W4235509381 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4235509381 hasAuthorship W4235509381A5002205534 @default.
- W4235509381 hasAuthorship W4235509381A5009670677 @default.
- W4235509381 hasAuthorship W4235509381A5069393217 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C165383583 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C2776809875 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C2778187792 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C2780440149 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C2781037480 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C136948725 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C141071460 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C165383583 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C2524010 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C2776809875 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C2778187792 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C2780440149 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C2781037480 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C2781411149 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C29694066 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C33923547 @default.
- W4235509381 hasConceptScore W4235509381C71924100 @default.
- W4235509381 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W4235509381 hasLocation W42355093811 @default.
- W4235509381 hasOpenAccess W4235509381 @default.
- W4235509381 hasPrimaryLocation W42355093811 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2047506018 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2068493548 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2074019087 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2084874962 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2090783295 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2164664281 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2226309188 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W2343597123 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W4206901687 @default.
- W4235509381 hasRelatedWork W4235509381 @default.
- W4235509381 hasVolume "140" @default.
- W4235509381 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4235509381 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4235509381 workType "article" @default.