FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4236070602> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4236070602 endingPage "963" @default.
• W4236070602 startingPage "963" @default.
• W4236070602 abstract "This study [1Yousefnia M.A. Mandegar M.H. Roshanali F. Alaeddini F. Amouzadeh F. Papillary muscle repositioning in mitral valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83: 958-963Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar] is a refreshingly high-quality randomized trial with blinded echocardiographic review. The technique described is potentially applicable to routine mitral replacement. Chordal preservation (ie, preservation of the posterior leaflet chords in particular) has been shown to essentially eliminate the dreaded complication of ventricular-annular separation. Chordal preservation has also been shown to better preserve ventricular function and dimensions compared with chordal resection. Yet in many cases in which the posterior leaflet or annulus, or both, are involved with bulky disease, chordal preservation can be difficult at best. The papillary muscle repositioning technique described here could potentially replace or supplement chordal preservation in these difficult cases.Optimizing suture length has been difficult while placing artificial chords in mitral repair. Similarly, achieving the correct distance or tension between the base of the papillary muscle and the annulus could be challenging in the papillary muscle repositioning technique, especially given that the lengths of the resected chords of the papillary muscles themselves can vary. Yet, by simply attaching the heads of the papillary muscles to the annulus, the authors reported no such problems. As has been seen in left ventricular aneurysm resection, leaving the left ventricular cavity too small with papillary muscle repositioning could theoretically impair stroke volume, whereas leaving the distance from the annulus to the base of the papillary muscle excessively long may be of little benefit.Why sutures were better than native chords in this study is unclear. It is likely that the authors reduced cavitary volume by reducing the distance from the base of the papillary muscle to the annulus with the papillary muscle repositioning technique. It may be important that this series examined only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% and mitral regurgitation. Whether the technique would apply to patients with mitral stenosis or normal left ventricular function is unclear. This series is also too small to know whether papillary muscle repositioning will eliminate ventricular-annular separation, and the 2-year intermediate-term results will need to be supplemented with longer term follow-up. The authors are nonetheless to be congratulated for an intriguing, well-designed study that could benefit many patients. This study [1Yousefnia M.A. Mandegar M.H. Roshanali F. Alaeddini F. Amouzadeh F. Papillary muscle repositioning in mitral valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83: 958-963Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar] is a refreshingly high-quality randomized trial with blinded echocardiographic review. The technique described is potentially applicable to routine mitral replacement. Chordal preservation (ie, preservation of the posterior leaflet chords in particular) has been shown to essentially eliminate the dreaded complication of ventricular-annular separation. Chordal preservation has also been shown to better preserve ventricular function and dimensions compared with chordal resection. Yet in many cases in which the posterior leaflet or annulus, or both, are involved with bulky disease, chordal preservation can be difficult at best. The papillary muscle repositioning technique described here could potentially replace or supplement chordal preservation in these difficult cases. Optimizing suture length has been difficult while placing artificial chords in mitral repair. Similarly, achieving the correct distance or tension between the base of the papillary muscle and the annulus could be challenging in the papillary muscle repositioning technique, especially given that the lengths of the resected chords of the papillary muscles themselves can vary. Yet, by simply attaching the heads of the papillary muscles to the annulus, the authors reported no such problems. As has been seen in left ventricular aneurysm resection, leaving the left ventricular cavity too small with papillary muscle repositioning could theoretically impair stroke volume, whereas leaving the distance from the annulus to the base of the papillary muscle excessively long may be of little benefit. Why sutures were better than native chords in this study is unclear. It is likely that the authors reduced cavitary volume by reducing the distance from the base of the papillary muscle to the annulus with the papillary muscle repositioning technique. It may be important that this series examined only patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% and mitral regurgitation. Whether the technique would apply to patients with mitral stenosis or normal left ventricular function is unclear. This series is also too small to know whether papillary muscle repositioning will eliminate ventricular-annular separation, and the 2-year intermediate-term results will need to be supplemented with longer term follow-up. The authors are nonetheless to be congratulated for an intriguing, well-designed study that could benefit many patients. Papillary Muscle Repositioning in Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Left Ventricular DysfunctionThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 83Issue 3PreviewThe aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of performing papillary muscle repositioning for mitral valve replacement procedures in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and to determine the early and late effects of this procedure on clinical outcome and left ventricular mechanics. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W4236070602 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4236070602 creator A5001524298 @default.
• W4236070602 date "2007-03-01" @default.
• W4236070602 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4236070602 title "Invited commentary" @default.
• W4236070602 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.066" @default.
• W4236070602 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17307441" @default.
• W4236070602 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W4236070602 type Work @default.
• W4236070602 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4236070602 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4236070602 hasAuthorship W4236070602A5001524298 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C150936888 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C2776570981 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C2777274916 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C2777543888 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C2777728562 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C57900726 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C105702510 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C126322002 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C141071460 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C150936888 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C164705383 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C2776570981 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C2777274916 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C2777327002 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C2777543888 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C2777728562 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C2780007028 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C57900726 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C59822182 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C71924100 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C84393581 @default.
• W4236070602 hasConceptScore W4236070602C86803240 @default.
• W4236070602 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4236070602 hasLocation W42360706021 @default.
• W4236070602 hasLocation W42360706022 @default.
• W4236070602 hasOpenAccess W4236070602 @default.
• W4236070602 hasPrimaryLocation W42360706021 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W1994750997 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W1997228657 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W2057544922 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W2068395522 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W2071276544 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W2155111230 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W2175293043 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W2412605305 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W2417422497 @default.
• W4236070602 hasRelatedWork W3113060377 @default.
• W4236070602 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W4236070602 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4236070602 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4236070602 workType "article" @default.