Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4237544134> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 58 of
58
with 100 items per page.
- W4237544134 endingPage "47" @default.
- W4237544134 startingPage "47" @default.
- W4237544134 abstract "A common view of aphasia is that Broca's aphasics have difficulty with grammatical analysis, whereas Wernicke's aphasics have a lexical or interpretative deficit. Now, however, Grodzinsky and Finkel 1 Grodzinsky Y. Finkel L. The neurology of empty categories: aphasic's failure to detect ungrammaticality. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1998; 10: 281-292 Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar show that both groups of aphasics are impaired with respect to grammatical analysis. Furthermore, this syntactic analysis deficit is restricted in nature. Grodzinsky and Finkel asked a group of four Broca's aphasics and a group of seven Wernicke's aphasics to make grammaticality judgments to grammatical sentences and to sentences in which various kinds of syntactic constraints were violated. Both Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics performed poorly on the task. However, the errors mostly concerned a particular type of syntactic constraint, namely, constraints that apply to syntactic movement of a full phrase [e.g. ‘Which woman did David think that saw John’ (cf. ‘that John saw’; trace effect of the word ‘that’) or ‘I don't know what who saw’ (cf. ‘I don't know who saw what’; superiority effects)] were incorrectly judged as grammatical. On the other hand, the aphasics performed better on constraints on movement of a smaller syntactic category (verb or negation) [e.g. ‘Have they could leave town?’ (cf. ‘Could they have left town?’); ‘John sat not’ (cf. ‘John didn't sit’)], or violations that do not involve movement [such as ‘Who did John see Joe?’ (cf. ‘Who did John see?’)]. Although both Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics show this pattern of performance, the Broca's aphasics were more selectively impaired with respect to the first type of constraint. Grodzinky and Finkel are the first to use a grammatical-judgment task with aphasics. The fact that their results tie in with earlier comprehension studies suggests that the aphasics' impairment is not dependent on the kind of task, but is a general linguistic impairment. On the other hand, the finding that the impairment concerns only a specific type of constraint suggests that the aphasic's deficit is structure-dependent, and hence functionally more restricted than has been previously assumed." @default.
- W4237544134 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4237544134 creator A5003882291 @default.
- W4237544134 date "1999-02-01" @default.
- W4237544134 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W4237544134 title "Constraining aphasia" @default.
- W4237544134 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01285-1" @default.
- W4237544134 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
- W4237544134 type Work @default.
- W4237544134 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4237544134 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4237544134 hasAuthorship W4237544134A5003882291 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C2185349 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C26022165 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C2776224158 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C2776397901 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C2779422653 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C2779525943 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C60048249 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C75291252 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConcept C94445187 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C138885662 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C15744967 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C180747234 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C2185349 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C26022165 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C2776224158 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C2776397901 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C2779422653 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C2779525943 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C41895202 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C60048249 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C75291252 @default.
- W4237544134 hasConceptScore W4237544134C94445187 @default.
- W4237544134 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4237544134 hasLocation W42375441341 @default.
- W4237544134 hasOpenAccess W4237544134 @default.
- W4237544134 hasPrimaryLocation W42375441341 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W1564230591 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2023216521 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2030968835 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2089204216 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2196091256 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2243878764 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2345383012 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2898205281 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W2971175476 @default.
- W4237544134 hasRelatedWork W4294868391 @default.
- W4237544134 hasVolume "3" @default.
- W4237544134 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4237544134 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4237544134 workType "article" @default.