FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4238889662> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4238889662 abstract "Field Results: Effect of Proppant Strength and Sieve Distribution Upon Well Productivity Paul Thomas Huckabee; Paul Thomas Huckabee Shell E&P Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Michael C. Vincent; Michael C. Vincent CARBO Ceramics Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Jay M. Foreman; Jay M. Foreman Williams Exploration & Prod Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar John Paul Spivey John Paul Spivey Phoenix Reservoir Engineering Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. Paper Number: SPE-96559-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/96559-MS Published: October 09 2005 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Huckabee, Paul Thomas, Vincent, Michael C., Foreman, Jay M., and John Paul Spivey. Field Results: Effect of Proppant Strength and Sieve Distribution Upon Well Productivity. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, October 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/96559-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractDevelopment of the Pinedale Anticline (PDA) of western Wyoming is proceeding at a rapid pace.During the past five years, approximately 500 million pounds of proppant have been placed into nearly 200 new wells.Despite this high activity level, no clear consensus has emerged from the various operators as to the optimal stimulation design. Proppant costs range from less than 20% to greater than 65% of the stimulation service company ticket dependent on proppant type selected. For one operator, proppant costs represent approximately 30% of the total completion cost and are a target for cost reduction efforts. These cost reduction efforts must be balanced with the economic value of proppant conductivity and its relationship with effective fracture half-length.This paper summarizes results from a field trial that was implemented to investigate the effect of proppant selection upon productivity from low-permeability (0.0006 – 0.015 md) formations of the Pinedale Anticline.This study compares the production from 452 fracture treatments in 30 new wells completed by Shell Rocky Mountain Production during the past three years.Production logs are used to compare the productivity of fractures propped with 20/40 sand, 20/40 resin-coated sand, 20/40 economy light-weight ceramic, broad- sieved intermediate strength, and 20/40 intermediate strength proppants.The results from this study are believed to be the first published field comparison of broadly-sieved and tightly-sieved ceramics.This trial predominantly maintained a consistent stimulation strategy to reduce complexity and uncertainty in the analysis of the proppant selection evaluation.Proppant selection was varied by stage dependent on depth and geologic intervals to provide reliable offset comparisons.Results are categorized by geologic interval to reduce uncertainties from variations in reservoir quality and pressure differentials to more accurately assess the impact of altering proppant type.Economic analyses are presented to illustrate the most cost effective products to incorporate into each fracture treatment.Actual field results are compared to model predictions and laboratory results to determine whether proppant strength and sieve distribution affect production in a predictable manner.Overview of the Pinedale AnticlineGas-saturated Lance sandstones were discovered in the Pinedale area in 1939. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the Pinedale Anticline (PDA) in Western Wyoming in the United States of America. From 1950 through 1990 operators drilled more than 50 wells into the Lance along the Pinedale Anticline; 27 of those wells are producing today.Development activity is high, with 200 new wells completed by 10 operators during the last five years. Keywords: delta 3, flow in porous media, rc prc elwc isp-b isp, hydraulic fracturing, upstream oil & gas, permeability, pinedale anticline, study area, proppant type, fracturing fluid Subjects: Hydraulic Fracturing, Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Fracturing materials (fluids, proppant), Flow in porous media This content is only available via PDF. 2005. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download." @default.
• W4238889662 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4238889662 creator A5017228946 @default.
• W4238889662 creator A5037367987 @default.
• W4238889662 creator A5042444616 @default.
• W4238889662 creator A5051796191 @default.
• W4238889662 date "2005-10-01" @default.
• W4238889662 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4238889662 title " Field Results: Effect of Proppant Strength and Sieve Distribution Upon Well Productivity " @default.
• W4238889662 doi "https://doi.org/10.2523/96559-ms" @default.
• W4238889662 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W4238889662 type Work @default.
• W4238889662 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4238889662 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4238889662 hasAuthorship W4238889662A5017228946 @default.
• W4238889662 hasAuthorship W4238889662A5037367987 @default.
• W4238889662 hasAuthorship W4238889662A5042444616 @default.
• W4238889662 hasAuthorship W4238889662A5051796191 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C37531588 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C127413603 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C161191863 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C2778805511 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C37531588 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C41008148 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C42475967 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C52119013 @default.
• W4238889662 hasConceptScore W4238889662C95457728 @default.
• W4238889662 hasLocation W42388896621 @default.
• W4238889662 hasOpenAccess W4238889662 @default.
• W4238889662 hasPrimaryLocation W42388896621 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W140869909 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W2611671123 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W2737632833 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W2903608945 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W2906403665 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W2914583227 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W3083202704 @default.
• W4238889662 hasRelatedWork W4248744780 @default.
• W4238889662 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4238889662 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4238889662 workType "article" @default.