FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4238974990> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4238974990 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> In the field of medicine and medical informatics, the importance of comprehensive metadata has long been recognized, and the composition of metadata has become its own field of profession and research. To ensure sustainable and meaningful metadata are maintained, standards and guidelines such as the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, Reusability) principles have been published. The compilation and maintenance of metadata is performed by field experts supported by metadata management apps. The usability of these apps, for example, in terms of ease of use, efficiency, and error tolerance, crucially determines their benefit to those interested in the data. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to provide a metadata management app with high usability that assists scientists in compiling and using rich metadata. We aim to evaluate our recently developed interactive web app for our collaborative metadata repository (CoMetaR). This study reflects how real users perceive the app by assessing usability scores and explicit usability issues. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We evaluated the CoMetaR web app by measuring the usability of 3 modules: <i>core module</i>, <i>provenance module</i>, and <i>data integration module</i>. We defined 10 tasks in which users must acquire information specific to their user role. The participants were asked to complete the tasks in a live web meeting. We used the System Usability Scale questionnaire to measure the usability of the app. For qualitative analysis, we applied a modified think aloud method with the following thematic analysis and categorization into the ISO 9241-110 usability categories. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> A total of 12 individuals participated in the study. We found that over 97% (85/88) of all the tasks were completed successfully. We measured usability scores of 81, 81, and 72 for the 3 evaluated modules. The qualitative analysis resulted in 24 issues with the app. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> A usability score of 81 implies very good usability for the 2 modules, whereas a usability score of 72 still indicates acceptable usability for the third module. We identified 24 issues that serve as starting points for further development. Our method proved to be effective and efficient in terms of effort and outcome. It can be adapted to evaluate apps within the medical informatics field and potentially beyond. </sec>" @default.
• W4238974990 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4238974990 creator A5017874388 @default.
• W4238974990 creator A5039450552 @default.
• W4238974990 creator A5044036919 @default.
• W4238974990 date "2021-05-10" @default.
• W4238974990 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4238974990 title "The Collaborative Metadata Repository (CoMetaR) Web App: Quantitative and Qualitative Usability Evaluation (Preprint)" @default.
• W4238974990 cites W19399978 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W1992673035 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2008896880 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2070812389 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2097766859 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2131660156 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2157735936 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2254472215 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2302501749 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2413143458 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2477454541 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2502513889 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2528203718 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2755562077 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2773787581 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2809049975 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2883904729 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2934450419 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2963842813 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2975868459 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W2976304879 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W4205899894 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W4252142948 @default.
• W4238974990 cites W4256073710 @default.
• W4238974990 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.30308" @default.
• W4238974990 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4238974990 type Work @default.
• W4238974990 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4238974990 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4238974990 hasAuthorship W4238974990A5017874388 @default.
• W4238974990 hasAuthorship W4238974990A5039450552 @default.
• W4238974990 hasAuthorship W4238974990A5044036919 @default.
• W4238974990 hasBestOaLocation W42389749902 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConcept C139225968 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConcept C4237393 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConcept C93518851 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConceptScore W4238974990C107457646 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConceptScore W4238974990C136764020 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConceptScore W4238974990C139225968 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConceptScore W4238974990C170130773 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConceptScore W4238974990C41008148 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConceptScore W4238974990C4237393 @default.
• W4238974990 hasConceptScore W4238974990C93518851 @default.
• W4238974990 hasLocation W42389749901 @default.
• W4238974990 hasLocation W42389749902 @default.
• W4238974990 hasOpenAccess W4238974990 @default.
• W4238974990 hasPrimaryLocation W42389749901 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W11588791 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W13877742 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W142996 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W14755750 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W2503058 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W2751474 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W2798310 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W3205524 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W5472601 @default.
• W4238974990 hasRelatedWork W6524917 @default.
• W4238974990 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4238974990 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4238974990 workType "article" @default.