FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4239046492> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4239046492 endingPage "436" @default.
• W4239046492 startingPage "418" @default.
• W4239046492 abstract "Background Intensive Insulin Therapy (IIT) as a means to achieve tight glycemic control (TGC) has become controversial in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) or mixed medical-surgical ICU. The question still remains as to the benefit of tight glycemic control in all patient populations and the optimal target blood glucose range. Review questions/objectives What is the effectiveness of tight glycemic control on adverse outcomes in non-surgical critically ill patients? More specifically, what is the rate of hypoglycemia and mortality in medical intensive care patients who are treated with tight glycemic control regimens? What should be the recommended blood glucose range for patients in a non-surgical, medical ICU? Inclusion criteria Types of participants This review included studies with patients 18 years of age and older, females and males, all types of conditions or diseases, and all stages of severity admitted to a critical care or intensive care unit that required hyperglycemia management and had not had a surgical procedure. Types of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest This review included studies that evaluated the effectiveness of tight glycemic control or intensive insulin therapy as compared to conventional, moderate or liberal insulin therapy. Types of outcomes This review considered studies that included the following outcome measures: frequency and severity of hypoglycemia, and any type of reported mortality. Types of studies This review included only randomized controlled trials which met all of the inclusion criteria. Search strategy A three-step search strategy was utilized find both published and unpublished studies in English language only. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL was completed followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe the article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms was then undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles was searched for additional studies. Methodological quality The reviewers used the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Randomised Controlled Trials to assess methodological quality. Data collection Data was extracted using The JBI Data Extraction Form for Experimental/Observational studies. Data synthesis Due to the heterogeneous nature of the study methods, the findings of this systematic review are presented in a narrative summary. Meta-analysis was unable to be performed. Results The four studies in this systematic review include patients with a multitude of diagnoses and comorbidities which further complicates treatment and outcomes assessment. Until further studies prove otherwise, nonsurgical patients requiring glycemic management are best served with less intensive regimens than their surgical counterparts. Conclusions Further research is needed to establish clear, evidence-based guidelines for the management of hyperglycemia in all ICU patient populations. Implications for practice Based on the results of this review and data from the four included studies, glycemic management for medical patients in the intensive care unit should differ from that of surgical patients. Blood glucoses should be kept between 110-180mg/dL in order to prevent the unwarranted effects of hypoglycemic episodes. Implications for research Published studies compare outcomes for patients with dissimilar medical conditions and current protocols for glycemic management are still based on the results of surgical patient trials. Measurements for interventions and outcomes need to be standardized in order to ensure proper comparison and application of results." @default.
• W4239046492 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4239046492 creator A5014993881 @default.
• W4239046492 creator A5075440729 @default.
• W4239046492 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W4239046492 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4239046492 title "Effectiveness of tight glycemic control in the medical Intensive Care Unit: a systematic review" @default.
• W4239046492 cites W1971637997 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W1972352298 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W1980717583 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2004105436 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2013161476 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2023341621 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2048064244 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2058406121 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2069477208 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2093856862 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2103519922 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2115285670 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2139706988 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2145053281 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2148706741 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2149347361 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2157775267 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2169968309 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2315963369 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W2434800969 @default.
• W4239046492 cites W4246288537 @default.
• W4239046492 doi "https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2011-122" @default.
• W4239046492 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W4239046492 type Work @default.
• W4239046492 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4239046492 countsByYear W42390464922018 @default.
• W4239046492 countsByYear W42390464922021 @default.
• W4239046492 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4239046492 hasAuthorship W4239046492A5014993881 @default.
• W4239046492 hasAuthorship W4239046492A5075440729 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C179755657 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C2779306644 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C2780473172 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C2780668416 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C126322002 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C141071460 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C168563851 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C177713679 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C179755657 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C2776376669 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C2779306644 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C2780473172 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C2780668416 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C2987404301 @default.
• W4239046492 hasConceptScore W4239046492C71924100 @default.
• W4239046492 hasIssue "13" @default.
• W4239046492 hasLocation W42390464921 @default.
• W4239046492 hasOpenAccess W4239046492 @default.
• W4239046492 hasPrimaryLocation W42390464921 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W1583479437 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W1975738245 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W2019785270 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W2072043915 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W2083314455 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W2157574216 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W2160583507 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W3164459101 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W4213213730 @default.
• W4239046492 hasRelatedWork W4307560231 @default.
• W4239046492 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W4239046492 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4239046492 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4239046492 workType "article" @default.