FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4239429629> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4239429629 endingPage "1808" @default.
• W4239429629 startingPage "1808" @default.
• W4239429629 abstract "<ns4:p><ns4:bold>Background: </ns4:bold>Evaluating applications for multi-national, multi-disciplinary, dual-purpose research consortia is highly complex. There has been little research on the peer review process for evaluating grant applications and almost none on how applications for multi-national consortia are reviewed. Overseas development investments are increasingly being channelled into international science consortia to generate high-quality research while simultaneously strengthening multi-disciplinary research capacity. We need a better understanding of how such decisions are made and their effectiveness.</ns4:p><ns4:p><ns4:bold>Methods: </ns4:bold>An award-making institution planned to fund 10 UK-Africa research consortia. Over two annual rounds, 34 out of 78 eligible applications were shortlisted and reviewed by at least five external reviewers before final selections were made by a face-to-face panel. We used an innovative approach involving structured, overt observations of award-making panel meetings and semi-structured interviews with panel members to explore how assessment criteria concerning research quality and capacity strengthening were applied during the peer review process. Data were coded and analysed using pre-designed matrices which incorporated categories relating to the assessment criteria.</ns4:p><ns4:p><ns4:bold>Results: </ns4:bold>In general the process was rigorous and well-managed. However, lack of clarity about differential weighting of criteria and variations in the panel’s understanding of research capacity strengthening resulted in some inconsistencies in use of the assessment criteria. Using the same panel for both rounds had advantages, in that during the second round consensus was achieved more quickly and the panel had increased focus on development aspects.</ns4:p><ns4:p><ns4:bold>Conclusion: </ns4:bold>Grant assessment panels for such complex research applications need to have topic- and context-specific expertise. They must also understand research capacity issues and have a flexible but equitable and transparent approach. This study has developed and tested an approach for evaluating the operation of such panels and has generated lessons that can promote coherence and transparency among grant-makers and ultimately make the award-making process more effective.</ns4:p>" @default.
• W4239429629 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4239429629 creator A5065793389 @default.
• W4239429629 creator A5066836044 @default.
• W4239429629 creator A5078355852 @default.
• W4239429629 creator A5086027516 @default.
• W4239429629 date "2017-12-22" @default.
• W4239429629 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4239429629 title "The peer review process for awarding funds to international science research consortia: a qualitative developmental evaluation" @default.
• W4239429629 cites W1966679658 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W1976219213 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W1980337030 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W1982340630 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2002502156 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2020367893 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2063233684 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2096059379 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2115099901 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2116171285 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2142641856 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2166585390 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2167919917 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2207209941 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2417800084 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W2771470428 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W4237327899 @default.
• W4239429629 cites W4240657541 @default.
• W4239429629 doi "https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12496.2" @default.
• W4239429629 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W4239429629 type Work @default.
• W4239429629 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4239429629 countsByYear W42394296292021 @default.
• W4239429629 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4239429629 hasAuthorship W4239429629A5065793389 @default.
• W4239429629 hasAuthorship W4239429629A5066836044 @default.
• W4239429629 hasAuthorship W4239429629A5078355852 @default.
• W4239429629 hasAuthorship W4239429629A5086027516 @default.
• W4239429629 hasBestOaLocation W42394296291 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C2777146004 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C111919701 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C138368954 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C17744445 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C199539241 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C2777146004 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C41008148 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C55493867 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C86803240 @default.
• W4239429629 hasConceptScore W4239429629C98045186 @default.
• W4239429629 hasFunder F4320319996 @default.
• W4239429629 hasLocation W42394296291 @default.
• W4239429629 hasOpenAccess W4239429629 @default.
• W4239429629 hasPrimaryLocation W42394296291 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W2022268986 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W2079184189 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W2515724224 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W2586216711 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W2612189006 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W2912426098 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W3004819416 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W3120597588 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W3166776741 @default.
• W4239429629 hasRelatedWork W3997747 @default.
• W4239429629 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W4239429629 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4239429629 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4239429629 workType "article" @default.