FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4239529892> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4239529892 endingPage "15" @default.
• W4239529892 startingPage "15" @default.
• W4239529892 abstract "ObjectivesAlthough lamb is consumed in low volumes in the U.S., especially when compared to high lamb consumption countries such as Australia (AUS) and New Zealand (NZ), U.S. consumers have 3 main options when choosing lamb in the U.S.: domestic, imported from AUS, or imported from NZ. Based on previous research with beef, palatability differences in lamb are expected when comparing country origins and muscle types. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of country-of-origin and muscle type on palatability of lamb loin and leg chops as determined by U.S. consumers.Materials and MethodsThe U.S. lamb (n = 70 carcasses) was obtained from a commercial lamb processor in Colorado; full lamb loins (IMPS 232; 1 × 1) and paired lamb legs (IMPS 233A) were retained from those carcasses, vacuum packaged and shipped to Texas. Full lamb loins and lamb legs from AUS and NZ were procured from food distributors. Loins were fabricated to obtain only the longissimus lumborum, by removing tenderloins, bone, flank and all other secondary muscles. Legs were fabricated to obtain the semimembranosus with adductor. Loins and legs were trimmed of any visible external fat and connective tissue, manually fabricated into 2.5 cm thick chops, vacuum packaged, stored at 2°C, and frozen at 21d postmortem. Untrained consumers (n = 360) from Lubbock, TX; State College, PA; Gainesville, FL; Fort Collins, CO; and Fresno, CA rated tenderness, juiciness, flavor liking and overall liking on 100 mm line scales. Data for sensory attributes were analyzed as a 2 × 3 factorial design using the GLIMMIX procedure SAS (Version 9.4; SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC) with fixed effects of country, muscle and their interaction. Location and consumer within testing night were included as random effects. Treatment least squares means were separated with the PDIFF option of SAS at a significance level of P < 0.05.ResultsThe interaction between country and muscle was detected for tenderness, flavor, and overall liking (P < 0.05). U.S. loins were more tender (P < 0.05) than all other treatments, followed by AUS and NZ loins, which did not differ (P > 0.05). Next, U.S. legs were more tender than legs from AUS or NZ, which did not differ (P > 0.05). Consumers preferred the flavor of U.S. loins more (P < 0.05) than all other treatments. Next, U.S. legs and AUS loins were similarly liked more than NZ loins, but consumers liked the flavor of legs from NZ and AUS less than any other treatment. Overall liking followed the exact same trend as flavor liking. Both country and muscle impacted (P < 0.01) juiciness scores. U.S. loin chops were juicier than AUS or NZ loin chops, regardless of muscle, and consumers rated loin chops juicier than legs chops, regardless of country (P < 0.05).ConclusionConsumers found palatability differences in lamb between country origins and muscle types. U.S. consumers prefer domestically sourced lamb over AUS and NZ when comparing tenderness, juiciness, flavor and overall liking. Loin chops were preferred over leg chops for all palatability traits. It is recommended that U.S. consumers purchase U.S. lamb and lamb loin for a better eating experience." @default.
• W4239529892 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4239529892 creator A5007272986 @default.
• W4239529892 creator A5015231315 @default.
• W4239529892 creator A5020888562 @default.
• W4239529892 creator A5081408927 @default.
• W4239529892 creator A5081493788 @default.
• W4239529892 date "2017-01-01" @default.
• W4239529892 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4239529892 title "US Consumer Assessment of Lamb Loin and Leg Chops From Australia, New Zealand, and United States" @default.
• W4239529892 doi "https://doi.org/10.22175/rmc2017.014" @default.
• W4239529892 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W4239529892 type Work @default.
• W4239529892 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4239529892 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4239529892 hasAuthorship W4239529892A5007272986 @default.
• W4239529892 hasAuthorship W4239529892A5015231315 @default.
• W4239529892 hasAuthorship W4239529892A5020888562 @default.
• W4239529892 hasAuthorship W4239529892A5081408927 @default.
• W4239529892 hasAuthorship W4239529892A5081493788 @default.
• W4239529892 hasBestOaLocation W42395298921 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConcept C172873279 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConcept C2777449483 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConcept C2780003869 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConcept C37621935 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConceptScore W4239529892C140793950 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConceptScore W4239529892C172873279 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConceptScore W4239529892C2777449483 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConceptScore W4239529892C2780003869 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConceptScore W4239529892C31903555 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConceptScore W4239529892C37621935 @default.
• W4239529892 hasConceptScore W4239529892C86803240 @default.
• W4239529892 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4239529892 hasLocation W42395298921 @default.
• W4239529892 hasOpenAccess W4239529892 @default.
• W4239529892 hasPrimaryLocation W42395298921 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W2016774939 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W2395293323 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W2794406376 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W2987672822 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W3013236869 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W312055948 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W349363198 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W4233985240 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W4252425156 @default.
• W4239529892 hasRelatedWork W4296564817 @default.
• W4239529892 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W4239529892 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4239529892 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4239529892 workType "article" @default.