FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4239561426> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4239561426 endingPage "1178" @default.
• W4239561426 startingPage "1119" @default.
• W4239561426 abstract "Objective The overall objective is to examine the current evidence of the impact of Magnet designation on patient and nurse outcomes. Inclusion criteria This review considered any quantitative or qualitative study comparing organizational, nurse, patient or economic outcomes in Magnet designated hospitals with a comparison to a non-Magnet facility. Studies which used case-controlled, descriptive comparative, descriptive correlational and qualitative designs were considered due to the nature of the question. Participants included nurses in four hospital types: ANCC Magnet, Reputational Magnet, Magnet-Aspiring, and non-Magnet. Interventions included: Magnet hospitals (ANCC), Reputational Magnet; Magnet-Aspiring hospitals and non-Magnet hospitals. Search Strategy The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies and papers, limited to the English language. An initial search of the Joanna Briggs Institute for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. A three-step search strategy was then used. A first-stage, limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL using preliminary key words was done. In consultation with an information scientist experienced in database searching, a comprehensive search strategy incorporating the key words from the preliminary search was undertaken. The third approach was to review the reference lists from all retrieved papers meeting the inclusion criteria to identify any further research not identified in the first two stages. Methodological quality Each paper was assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological quality prior to inclusion using the appropriate critical appraisal instrument from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Results A total of 17 papers were included in the review. All were descriptive comparative studies with the majority using a cross sectional survey approach comparing outcomes across either two or three categories of Magnet designation. Comparison across studies using the same instrument was limited as survey instruments were not used in the same manner and studies had different Magnet designation comparison groups. Majority of studies investigated professional nurse practice environment, nurse burnout, nurse satisfaction, perception of quality care, and intent to leave. Limited studies found related to patient outcomes, and no studies met criteria for inclusion for economic review. Conclusion The investment is worth it. There is evidence to support the positive effect of Magnet designation on the professional nurse practice environment (PNPE). Stronger PNPE and Magnet status are associated with lower levels of nurse burnout, higher levels of nursing satisfaction, higher perceptions of quality of care, and decreased intent to leave. There is a need to further investigate the linkage between PNPE and/or Magnet designation with patient outcomes. Understanding the economic implications of a PNPE requires further study." @default.
• W4239561426 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4239561426 creator A5045873689 @default.
• W4239561426 creator A5072019585 @default.
• W4239561426 creator A5079580654 @default.
• W4239561426 creator A5089001514 @default.
• W4239561426 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W4239561426 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4239561426 title "A comprehensive systematic review of evidence on determining the impact of Magnet designation on nursing and patient outcomes: is the investment worth it?" @default.
• W4239561426 cites W1965867799 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W1967414240 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W1969757616 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W1977592497 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W1988633809 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W1993560092 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W1994994810 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2007725375 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2010603414 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2016300106 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2041713180 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2044607378 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2048826446 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2068638712 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2084244638 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2086292143 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2099112819 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2115664391 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2116758991 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2144816256 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2165848061 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2188137533 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W2322455089 @default.
• W4239561426 cites W4241447373 @default.
• W4239561426 doi "https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2009-207" @default.
• W4239561426 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W4239561426 type Work @default.
• W4239561426 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W4239561426 countsByYear W42395614262013 @default.
• W4239561426 countsByYear W42395614262017 @default.
• W4239561426 countsByYear W42395614262018 @default.
• W4239561426 countsByYear W42395614262020 @default.
• W4239561426 countsByYear W42395614262021 @default.
• W4239561426 countsByYear W42395614262022 @default.
• W4239561426 countsByYear W42395614262023 @default.
• W4239561426 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4239561426 hasAuthorship W4239561426A5045873689 @default.
• W4239561426 hasAuthorship W4239561426A5072019585 @default.
• W4239561426 hasAuthorship W4239561426A5079580654 @default.
• W4239561426 hasAuthorship W4239561426A5089001514 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C109359841 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C111472728 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C138885662 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C15744967 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C159110408 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C17744445 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C199539241 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C27415008 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C2776478404 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C2779473830 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C2779530757 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C2781145037 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C71924100 @default.
• W4239561426 hasConceptScore W4239561426C77805123 @default.
• W4239561426 hasIssue "26" @default.
• W4239561426 hasLocation W42395614261 @default.
• W4239561426 hasOpenAccess W4239561426 @default.
• W4239561426 hasPrimaryLocation W42395614261 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W1999383655 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2013326109 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2069214859 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2093949750 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2105116477 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2164143189 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2226160317 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2732280599 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W2996791236 @default.
• W4239561426 hasRelatedWork W3112832253 @default.
• W4239561426 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W4239561426 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4239561426 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4239561426 workType "article" @default.