FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4239773089> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4239773089 endingPage "2409" @default.
• W4239773089 startingPage "2404" @default.
• W4239773089 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Nov 2009A Multicenter Study on the Perineal Versus Penoscrotal Approach for Implantation of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Cuff Size and Control of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Gerard D. Henry, Stephen M. Graham, Robert J. Cornell, Mario A. Cleves, Caroline J. Simmons, Ioannis Vakalopoulos, and Brian Flynn Gerard D. HenryGerard D. Henry Regional Urology, Shreveport, Louisiana Financial interest and/or other relationship with AMS, Coloplast, Pfizer, Lilly and Astellas. More articles by this author , Stephen M. GrahamStephen M. Graham Division of Urology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author , Robert J. CornellRobert J. Cornell Cornell Urology, Houston, Texas Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author , Mario A. ClevesMario A. Cleves Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author , Caroline J. SimmonsCaroline J. Simmons Regional Urology, Shreveport, Louisiana Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author , Ioannis VakalopoulosIoannis Vakalopoulos Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author , and Brian FlynnBrian Flynn Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado Financial interest and/or other relationship with Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Swan Valley Medical and Astellas. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.068AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: In a single center retrospective study we previously reported superior dry rates and fewer artificial urinary sphincter revisions when the sphincter cuff was placed via the traditional perineal approach compared with a penoscrotal approach. A multicenter study was performed to compare the approaches further and explain the disparity in outcomes. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 158 patients who underwent these procedures from April 1987 to October 2007 at 4 centers. Results: During 184 surgeries in 158 patients 201 artificial urinary sphincter cuffs were placed (90 penoscrotal and 111 perineal). Among patients with known followup the completely dry rate for single cuff artificial urinary sphincters was 17 of 62 (27.4%) in the penoscrotal group and 41 of 93 (44.1%) in the perineal group (p = 0.04). Continued incontinence necessitated subsequent tandem cuff in 7 of the 62 (11.3%) penoscrotal cases compared to only 5 of the 93 (5.4%) perineal cases. Cuff size in the penoscrotal group was 5.0 cm in 1 patient (1.1%), 4.5 cm in 11 (12.2%) and 4.0 cm in 78 (86.7%). Cuff size in the perineal group was 5.5 cm in 1 patient (0.9%), 5.0 cm in 8 (7.2%), 4.5 cm in 30 (27.0%) and 4.0 cm in 72 (64.9%). Conclusions: There appears to be a higher completely dry rate with fewer subsequent tandem cuff additions with the perineal approach compared to the penoscrotal approach. This disparity may be explained by a more proximal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in the perineal group as evidenced by a larger cuff size. References 1 : Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol1974; 112: 75. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Experience with the artificial urinary sphincter model AS800 in 148 patients. J Urol1989; 141: 307. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Mayo Clinic experience with use of the AMS800 artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol1989; 142: 1459. Link, Google Scholar 4 : The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol2000; 164: 702. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. J Urol2001; 166: 547. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Use of a double cuff AMS 800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. J Urol1993; 149: 283. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Transcorporeal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol2002; 167: 2075. Link, Google Scholar 8 : New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol2003; 169: 261. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Re: Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach. J Urol2009; 181: 417. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach. J Urol2008; 179: 1475. Link, Google Scholar 11 : The artificial urinary sphincter: experience in adults. Urol Clin North Am1989; 16: 105. Google Scholar 12 : Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. New York: Wiley1992. pp 67–78, 109–112. Google Scholar 13 : An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using STATA. College Station, Texas: Stata Press2002. pp 51–69, 93–102, 113–115. Google Scholar 14 : Continence and quality of life assessment after artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Isr Med Assoc J2004; 6: 592. Google Scholar 15 : Quality of life, functional outcome, and durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter in patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Urol Int2003; 71: 55. Google Scholar 16 : 13 Years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol2007; 177: 1021. Link, Google Scholar 17 : Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol2001; 166: 1755. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Re: new surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol2003; 170: 550. Link, Google Scholar 19 : Mayo Clinic long-term analysis of the functional durability of the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: a review of 323 cases. J Urol1998; 159: 1206. Link, Google Scholar 20 : A statistical comparison of pad numbers versus pad weights in the quantification of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn2007; 26: 3. Google Scholar © 2009 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byBentellis I, El-Akri M, Cornu J, Brierre T, Cousin T, Gaillard V, Dupuis H, Tricard T, Hermieu N, Bertrand-Leon P, Chevallier D, Bruyere F, Biardeau X, Hermieu J, Lecoanet P, Capon G, Game X, Saussine C, Durand M and Peyronnet B (2021) Prevalence and Risk Factors of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Revision in Nonneurological Male PatientsJournal of Urology, VOL. 206, NO. 5, (1248-1257), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021.Sandhu J, Breyer B, Comiter C, Eastham J, Gomez C, Kirages D, Kittle C, Lucioni A, Nitti V, Stoffel J, Westney O, Murad M and McCammon K (2019) Incontinence after Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU GuidelineJournal of Urology, VOL. 202, NO. 2, (369-378), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019.Moser D, Kaufman M, Milam D, Johnsen N, Cleves M, Broghammer J, Brant W, Jones L, Brady J, Gross M, Jani K and Henry G (2018) Impact of Radiation and Transcorporeal Artificial Sphincter Placement in Patients with Prior Urethral Cuff Erosion: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 200, NO. 6, (1338-1343), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018.Kaiho Y, Masuda H, Takei M, Hirayama T, Mitsui T, Yokoyama M, Kitta T, Kawamorita N, Nakagawa H, Iwamura M and Arai Y (2017) Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 1, (245-250), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2018.Yafi F, DeLay K, Stewart C, Chiang J, Sangkum P and Hellstrom W (2016) Device Survival after Primary Implantation of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Male Stress Urinary IncontinenceJournal of Urology, VOL. 197, NO. 3 Part 1, (759-765), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017.Segal R, Cabrini M, Harris E, Mostwin J, Bivalacqua T and Burnett A (2013) Combined Inflatable Penile Prosthesis-Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation: No Increased Risk of Adverse Events Compared to Single or Staged Device ImplantationJournal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 6, (2183-2188), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2013.Anusionwu I, Miles-Thomas J, Hernandez D and Wright E (2012) Anatomical and Manometric Comparison of Perineal and Transscrotal Approaches to Artificial Urinary Sphincter PlacementJournal of Urology, VOL. 188, NO. 5, (1834-1836), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2012. Volume 182Issue 5November 2009Page: 2404-2409 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2009 by American Urological AssociationKeywordsurinary sphinctermalegenitaliaurinary incontinenceurethraartificialMetricsAuthor Information Gerard D. Henry Regional Urology, Shreveport, Louisiana Financial interest and/or other relationship with AMS, Coloplast, Pfizer, Lilly and Astellas. More articles by this author Stephen M. Graham Division of Urology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Robert J. Cornell Cornell Urology, Houston, Texas Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Mario A. Cleves Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Caroline J. Simmons Regional Urology, Shreveport, Louisiana Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Ioannis Vakalopoulos Department of Urology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Nothing to disclose. More articles by this author Brian Flynn Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado Financial interest and/or other relationship with Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Swan Valley Medical and Astellas. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W4239773089 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4239773089 creator A5000310976 @default.
• W4239773089 creator A5026508278 @default.
• W4239773089 creator A5038442279 @default.
• W4239773089 creator A5066128437 @default.
• W4239773089 creator A5074907890 @default.
• W4239773089 creator A5085115101 @default.
• W4239773089 creator A5090326706 @default.
• W4239773089 date "2009-11-01" @default.
• W4239773089 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W4239773089 title "A Multicenter Study on the Perineal Versus Penoscrotal Approach for Implantation of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Cuff Size and Control of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence" @default.
• W4239773089 cites W1966091294 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W1981464157 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W1982122438 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2021397404 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2024802885 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2031883127 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2036259241 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2075176470 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2077444643 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2087092037 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2088191311 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2155266513 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2258211601 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W2409977239 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W34567210 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W4293859015 @default.
• W4239773089 cites W4322703104 @default.
• W4239773089 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.068" @default.
• W4239773089 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W4239773089 type Work @default.
• W4239773089 citedByCount "45" @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892012 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892013 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892014 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892015 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892016 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892017 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892018 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892019 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892020 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892021 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892022 @default.
• W4239773089 countsByYear W42397730892023 @default.
• W4239773089 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4239773089 hasAuthorship W4239773089A5000310976 @default.
• W4239773089 hasAuthorship W4239773089A5026508278 @default.
• W4239773089 hasAuthorship W4239773089A5038442279 @default.
• W4239773089 hasAuthorship W4239773089A5066128437 @default.
• W4239773089 hasAuthorship W4239773089A5074907890 @default.
• W4239773089 hasAuthorship W4239773089A5085115101 @default.
• W4239773089 hasAuthorship W4239773089A5090326706 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C2778531004 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C2779656439 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C2992435398 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConcept C88537330 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C126322002 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C126894567 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C141071460 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C168563851 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C2778531004 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C2779656439 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C2780017030 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C2992435398 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C71924100 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C77411442 @default.
• W4239773089 hasConceptScore W4239773089C88537330 @default.
• W4239773089 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4239773089 hasLocation W42397730891 @default.
• W4239773089 hasOpenAccess W4239773089 @default.
• W4239773089 hasPrimaryLocation W42397730891 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W1987725374 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W2023989879 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W2138282079 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W2139123971 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W2606964733 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W4235292667 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W4239351814 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W4243563326 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W4254720405 @default.
• W4239773089 hasRelatedWork W4320801103 @default.
• W4239773089 hasVolume "182" @default.
• W4239773089 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4239773089 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4239773089 workType "article" @default.