FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4240202389> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4240202389 abstract "Well Performance and Completion Effectiveness in the Baldy Butte Field, Washakie Basin, Wyoming Dave Cramer; Dave Cramer BJ Services Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Darrick Stallings Darrick Stallings Yates Petroleum Corporation Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 1998. Paper Number: SPE-49046-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/49046-MS Published: September 27 1998 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Cramer, Dave, and Darrick Stallings. Well Performance and Completion Effectiveness in the Baldy Butte Field, Washakie Basin, Wyoming. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, September 1998. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/49046-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractThe Baldy Butte field is located in the East Washaltie subbasin of the Greater Green River Basin and is several miles east of the prolific Echo Springs/ Standard Draw Almond bar sand trend. Wells are completed in the upper 300 to 400 ft of the Almond formation (Upper Mesaverde), at a true-vertical depth of around 8000 ft. Production is wet-gas (10–14 bbl of condensate mmscf gas) and occurs from naturally fractured low-stand deltaic, marine and fluvial point-bar sand deposits. These sands are over-pressured (0.57 psi/ft gradient), possess an average permeability of 0.04 md, and exhibit variable continuity within the field. Most of the field development has occurred over the last 2 1/2 years, and has involved contrasting well-completion methods, each specific to the three companies that operate wells in the field. This paper documents an analysis of 29 recent, contiguous completions in the Baldy Butte field, comparing the effectiveness of the three contrasting completion stimulation methods. The evaluation was based primarily on use of the reciprocal productivity index (RPI) graphical production-analysis method. Using RPJ, daily production and wellhead pressure data for each well was used to dissect well performance, obtaining information on reservoir flow capacity, stimulation effectiveness, reservoir flow geometry, drained area/volume, and produced liquid management. Distinct differences in reservoir quality and effectiveness among the contrasting completion methods were observed.P. 307 Keywords: creston nose, reservoir, spe 49046, muddy creek, hydraulic fracturing, conductivity, coal bank, fracture, fracture half-length, drillstem testing Subjects: Hydraulic Fracturing, Formation Evaluation & Management, Drillstem/well testing This content is only available via PDF. 1998. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download." @default.
• W4240202389 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4240202389 creator A5005891153 @default.
• W4240202389 creator A5050960721 @default.
• W4240202389 date "1998-09-01" @default.
• W4240202389 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4240202389 title "Well Performance and Completion Effectiveness in the Baldy Butte Field, Washakie Basin, Wyoming " @default.
• W4240202389 doi "https://doi.org/10.2523/49046-ms" @default.
• W4240202389 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W4240202389 type Work @default.
• W4240202389 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4240202389 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4240202389 hasAuthorship W4240202389A5005891153 @default.
• W4240202389 hasAuthorship W4240202389A5050960721 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConcept C167391731 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConcept C37531588 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConceptScore W4240202389C161191863 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConceptScore W4240202389C166957645 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConceptScore W4240202389C167391731 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConceptScore W4240202389C205649164 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConceptScore W4240202389C2778805511 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConceptScore W4240202389C37531588 @default.
• W4240202389 hasConceptScore W4240202389C41008148 @default.
• W4240202389 hasLocation W42402023891 @default.
• W4240202389 hasOpenAccess W4240202389 @default.
• W4240202389 hasPrimaryLocation W42402023891 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W2087230334 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W2279929528 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W2765679345 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W2943309597 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W2993808206 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W770500830 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W801022094 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W806980984 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W826816199 @default.
• W4240202389 hasRelatedWork W837008050 @default.
• W4240202389 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4240202389 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4240202389 workType "article" @default.