Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4240410738> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4240410738 endingPage "566" @default.
- W4240410738 startingPage "554" @default.
- W4240410738 abstract "Background Context Low back pain (LBP) is a disorder that commonly affects the working population, resulting in disability, health-care utilization, and a heavy socioeconomic burden. Although the etiology of LBP remains uncertain, occupational activities have been implicated. Evaluating these potentially causal relationships requires a methodologically rigorous approach. Occupational repetitive and/or heavy lifting is widely thought to be a risk factor for the development of LBP. Purpose To conduct a systematic review of the scientific literature to evaluate the causal relationship between occupational lifting and LBP. Study Design Systematic review of the literature. Sample Studies reporting an association between occupational lifting and LBP. Outcome Measures Numerical association between different levels of exposure to occupational lifting and the presence or severity of LBP. Methods A search was conducted using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, OSH-ROM, gray literature (eg, reports not published in scientific journals), hand-searching occupational health journals, reference lists of included studies, and content experts. Evaluation of study quality was performed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Levels of evidence were evaluated for specific Bradford-Hill criteria (association, dose-response, temporality, experiment, and biological plausibility). Results This search yielded 2,766 citations, of which 35 studies met eligibility criteria and 9 were considered high methodological quality studies, including four case-controls and five prospective cohorts. Among the high-quality studies, there was conflicting evidence for association with four studies reporting significant associations and five studies reporting nonsignificant results. Two of the three studies that assessed dose-response demonstrated a nonsignificant trend. There were no significant risk estimates that demonstrated temporality. No studies were identified that satisfied the experiment criterion. Subgroup analyses identified certain types of lifting and LBP that had statistically significant results, but there were none that satisfied more than two of the Bradford-Hill criteria. Conclusions This review uncovered several high-quality studies examining a relationship between occupational lifting and LBP, but these studies did not consistently support any of the Bradford-Hill criteria for causality. There was moderate evidence of an association for specific types of lifting and LBP. Based on these results, it is unlikely that occupational lifting is independently causative of LBP in the populations of workers studied. Further research in specific subcategories of lifting would further clarify the presence or absence of a causal relationship." @default.
- W4240410738 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4240410738 creator A5017216245 @default.
- W4240410738 creator A5027259098 @default.
- W4240410738 creator A5037226361 @default.
- W4240410738 creator A5072321364 @default.
- W4240410738 creator A5088647547 @default.
- W4240410738 date "2010-06-01" @default.
- W4240410738 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
- W4240410738 title "Causal assessment of occupational lifting and low back pain: results of a systematic review" @default.
- W4240410738 cites W1968296137 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W1973253416 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W198668494 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W1994341534 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W1999811298 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2000747693 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2002695289 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2002853716 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2012652379 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W201911122 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2024655307 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2028012836 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2030161843 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2030869895 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2034583003 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2034634858 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2037200742 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2037490651 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2041132892 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2042927068 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2046104727 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2050256879 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2052495366 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2053967014 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2074420844 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2076620994 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2077425641 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2077647571 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2095563058 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2103827831 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2111216425 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2119159301 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2124239698 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2125208830 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2134507564 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2138839174 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2145444714 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2147300976 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2148361366 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2149659334 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2154845690 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2158354518 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2161166663 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2169558481 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2170445946 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2287055415 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2338278742 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W2765962600 @default.
- W4240410738 cites W4254776092 @default.
- W4240410738 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2010.03.033" @default.
- W4240410738 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20494816" @default.
- W4240410738 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W4240410738 type Work @default.
- W4240410738 citedByCount "109" @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382012 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382013 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382014 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382015 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382016 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382017 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382018 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382019 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382020 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382021 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382022 @default.
- W4240410738 countsByYear W42404107382023 @default.
- W4240410738 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4240410738 hasAuthorship W4240410738A5017216245 @default.
- W4240410738 hasAuthorship W4240410738A5027259098 @default.
- W4240410738 hasAuthorship W4240410738A5037226361 @default.
- W4240410738 hasAuthorship W4240410738A5072321364 @default.
- W4240410738 hasAuthorship W4240410738A5088647547 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C147077947 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C166735990 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C2777414892 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W4240410738 hasConcept C2780907711 @default.