FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4241010807> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4241010807 abstract "Note: this manuscript has been peer reviewed and is published in Meta-Psychology. Please cite as: Prochilo, G. A., Louis, W. R., Bode, S., Zacher, H., &amp; Molenberghs, P. (2019). An Extended Commentary on Post-publication Peer Review in Organizational Neuroscience. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.935 | While considerable progress has been made in organizational neuroscience over the past decade, we argue that critical evaluations of published empirical works are not being conducted carefully and consistently. In this extended commentary we take as an example Waldman and colleagues (2017): a major review work that evaluates the state-of-the-art of organizational neuroscience. In what should be an evaluation of the field’s empirical work, the authors uncritically summarize a series of studies that: (1) provide insufficient transparency to be clearly understood, evaluated, or replicated, and/or (2) which misuse inferential tests that lead to misleading conclusions, among other concerns. These concerns have been ignored across multiple major reviews and citing articles. We therefore provide a post-publication review (in two parts) of one-third of all studies evaluated in Waldman and colleague’s major review work. In Part I, we systematically evaluate the field’s two seminal works with respect to their methods, analytic strategy, results, and interpretation of findings. And in Part II, we provide focused reviews of secondary works that each center on a specific concern we suggest should be a point of discussion as the field moves forward. In doing so, we identify a series of practices we recommend will improve the state of the literature. This includes: (1) evaluating the transparency and completeness of an empirical article before accepting its claims, (2) becoming familiar with common misuses or misconceptions of statistical testing, and (3) interpreting results with an explicit reference to effect size magnitude, precision, and accuracy, among other recommendations. We suggest that adopting these practices will motivate the development of a more replicable, reliable, and trustworthy field of organizational neuroscience moving forward." @default.
• W4241010807 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4241010807 creator A5020160346 @default.
• W4241010807 creator A5023908603 @default.
• W4241010807 creator A5028885320 @default.
• W4241010807 creator A5038112563 @default.
• W4241010807 creator A5047312329 @default.
• W4241010807 date "2018-10-03" @default.
• W4241010807 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4241010807 title "An Extended Commentary on Post-Publication Peer Review In Organizational Neuroscience" @default.
• W4241010807 doi "https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hv3rm" @default.
• W4241010807 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W4241010807 type Work @default.
• W4241010807 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4241010807 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4241010807 hasAuthorship W4241010807A5020160346 @default.
• W4241010807 hasAuthorship W4241010807A5023908603 @default.
• W4241010807 hasAuthorship W4241010807A5028885320 @default.
• W4241010807 hasAuthorship W4241010807A5038112563 @default.
• W4241010807 hasAuthorship W4241010807A5047312329 @default.
• W4241010807 hasBestOaLocation W42410108072 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C111472728 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C120936955 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C138885662 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C15744967 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C17744445 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C199539241 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C202444582 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C2780233690 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C33923547 @default.
• W4241010807 hasConceptScore W4241010807C9652623 @default.
• W4241010807 hasLocation W42410108071 @default.
• W4241010807 hasLocation W42410108072 @default.
• W4241010807 hasLocation W42410108073 @default.
• W4241010807 hasLocation W42410108074 @default.
• W4241010807 hasOpenAccess W4241010807 @default.
• W4241010807 hasPrimaryLocation W42410108071 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W1983609875 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W2035956074 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W2156244187 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W2266418237 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W2907715941 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W2942192046 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W2993642857 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W3121572816 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W4226398948 @default.
• W4241010807 hasRelatedWork W957428691 @default.
• W4241010807 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4241010807 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4241010807 workType "article" @default.