FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4241799229> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4241799229 abstract "Introduction: Smiles can be improved by veneering teeth using a relatively conservative technique. The appearance of veneers and smile design has not been previously investigated in the UAE. This study aimed to assess the aesthetic preferences of different smile designs rated by a group of prosthodontic residents and specialists. Methods: A questionnaire was devised asking about demographic details such as age and gender as well as clinical experience before and after graduation. Images of ten cases who had ceramic veneers fitted on their anterior teeth were included in the questionnaire. There were two images for each case: smiling with lips shown and close-up with retracted lips and cheeks. A total of seven questions regarding the appearance for each case were posed to each rater. Each question had a 5 point Likert rating scale from poor to excellent. All residents in prosthodontics at HBMCDM and UAE recognized specialists in prosthodontics were invited to participate. The specialists were recruited from the DHA/CPQ database. Result: A total of 25 dentists rated the 10 cases. There were 12 residents and 13 specialists, 40% were from the UAE and 60% from other countries. The residents were significantly younger than the specialists with mean ages of 29.4 years and 43.0 years respectively (p<0.001). Ten raters were male and 15 female. An overall amalgamated mean score was calculated for each case by summing all 7 individual scores for the 7 questions by rater. Males rated case 8, visible papillae following lip contour, significantly more highly than females (p<0.004). The overall ranking of the 10 cases was determined by gaining a mean % score for each case by summing the Likert scores for all seven questions and dividing by the maximum score of 35 per case. Both the residents and specialists agreed that case 9 (long teeth contacting the lower lip) was the most pleasant (68%) and that case 5 (midline discrepancy) was the most unattractive (39%). Overall, cases 9 and 6 were the most pleasing and cases 5 and 10 were the most displeasing. Conclusion: The residents and prosthodontic specialists were mostly in agreement when rating the esthetics of several different smile designs. Symmetry and the upper lip just covering the upper gingival margins were the most pleasing whilst a non-coincident midline and gingival inflammation were deemed the most unattractive." @default.
• W4241799229 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4241799229 date "2018-05-17" @default.
• W4241799229 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4241799229 title "The Perception of Dental Esthetics Assessed by Prosthodontic Residents and UAE Recognized Specialists in Prosthodontics" @default.
• W4241799229 cites W1974566951 @default.
• W4241799229 cites W2015228896 @default.
• W4241799229 cites W2033438420 @default.
• W4241799229 cites W4293003510 @default.
• W4241799229 doi "https://doi.org/10.33140/jodh/02/01/00007" @default.
• W4241799229 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W4241799229 type Work @default.
• W4241799229 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4241799229 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C2776510725 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C2777634892 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C2779529714 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C105776082 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C127413603 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C138496976 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C15744967 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C169760540 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C199343813 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C26760741 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C2776510725 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C2777634892 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C2779529714 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C29694066 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C512399662 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C71924100 @default.
• W4241799229 hasConceptScore W4241799229C78519656 @default.
• W4241799229 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4241799229 hasLocation W42417992291 @default.
• W4241799229 hasOpenAccess W4241799229 @default.
• W4241799229 hasPrimaryLocation W42417992291 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W10478381 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W10967767 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W1503000 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W15533352 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W1589819 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W3848210 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W4218851 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W4963676 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W6161541 @default.
• W4241799229 hasRelatedWork W947988 @default.
• W4241799229 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W4241799229 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4241799229 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4241799229 workType "article" @default.