Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4242197879> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 items per page.
- W4242197879 endingPage "775" @default.
- W4242197879 startingPage "775" @default.
- W4242197879 abstract "This article examines competing hypotheses on law derived from the theories of Talcott Parsons, Niklas Luhmann, and Jürgen Habermas in light of the recent history of U.S. abortion law, specifically the Supreme Court's rulings on abortion over the past two decades. The evidence I advance suggests that Luhmann's theory cannot explain how abortion law since 1973 has developed with the influence of certain nonlegal contexts. The perspectives of Parsons and Habermas, on the other hand, adequately grasp some of the outside influences on the legal abortion process. Parsons's theory particularly shows its strength in accounting for the political influences on abortion law and the individualistic nature of the American legal system. Habermas's theory rightly emphasizes the delicate force of lifeworld claims over the normativity of law as well as the relevance of a medical-technocratic reformulation of legal justifications. I conclude by arguing that sociological analyses of law should strive to conceptually elucidate the continuing struggles over and through law, and that they should recognize, particularly in light of growing multiculturalism, the loss of integrative force modern law continues to ascribe to itself." @default.
- W4242197879 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4242197879 creator A5084051267 @default.
- W4242197879 date "1998-03-01" @default.
- W4242197879 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4242197879 title "The Boundaries of Abortion Law: Systems Theory from Parsons to Luhmann and Habermas" @default.
- W4242197879 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3005694" @default.
- W4242197879 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
- W4242197879 type Work @default.
- W4242197879 citedByCount "10" @default.
- W4242197879 countsByYear W42421978792018 @default.
- W4242197879 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4242197879 hasAuthorship W4242197879A5084051267 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C131330614 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C17022365 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C170692843 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C2780188709 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C111472728 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C131330614 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C138885662 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C144024400 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C17022365 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C170692843 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C17744445 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C199539241 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C2780188709 @default.
- W4242197879 hasConceptScore W4242197879C36289849 @default.
- W4242197879 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W4242197879 hasLocation W42421978791 @default.
- W4242197879 hasOpenAccess W4242197879 @default.
- W4242197879 hasPrimaryLocation W42421978791 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W135267662 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W1500938080 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W1563617400 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W2062180775 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W2142144005 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W2286140133 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W2366901044 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W2599455044 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W4249575522 @default.
- W4242197879 hasRelatedWork W4320148022 @default.
- W4242197879 hasVolume "76" @default.
- W4242197879 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4242197879 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4242197879 workType "article" @default.