FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4242847319> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4242847319 endingPage "183" @default.
• W4242847319 startingPage "179" @default.
• W4242847319 abstract "In March 2008, FRAX, developed by Kanis and collaborators in the University of Sheffield and supported by the World Health Organization, became available online to calculate absolute risk of osteoporotic fracture in the next 10 years. To analyze the risk of fracture calculated by FRAX and its determinants in the patients sent to a densitometry unit for bone mineral density (BMD) testing. All the patients submitted by Primary Care to the Densitometry Unit for BMD testing underwent a self administered questionnaire to assess the clinical risk factors included in FRAX and a bone densitometry of lumbar spine and proximal femur with a DXA densitometer Hologic QDR 4500. They were classified as having a normal BMD, osteopenia or osteoporosis along with the recommendations of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. As the reference population to calculate the T and Z scores, we used the one from the NHANES III study for femoral neck and total hip and the one from the Study of the Spanish Population for total spine. With the data of the questionnaire, we calculated, by FRAX, the absolute risk in the next ten years of having a major fracture (MFR) or a hip fracture (HFR). Both risks were calculated with or without the inclusion in the algorithm of BMD: MFR+, MFR−, HFR+ and HFR−. The results were recorded in an Access 2003 database and analyzed with the statistical package SPSS 15.0 for Windows. We analyzed the data from 853 women with a mean age of 61.9 (8.9) years and a mean body mass index of 27.0 (4.2) kg/m2. Mean BMD at lumbar spine was 0.873 (0.127) g/cm2; at femoral neck, 0.704 (0.105) g/cm2; and at total hip, 0.817 (0.107) g/cm2. Twenty percent of the patients had a normal BMD, 55% had osteopenia and 25%, osteoporosis. Yet excluding age and body mass index, the number of fracture risk factors seems low: 31% of the patients had no risk of fracture; 40%, had one; 22%, two; 6%, three; 1%, four; and one patient had five. Mean MFR+ was 5.4 (4.8)%; mean MFR−, 6.3 (5.5)%; mean HFR+, 1.5 (2.9)%; and HFR−, 2.1 (3.3)%. When BMD was included in the algorithm for the calculation of the risk of fracture, the risk was statistically lower (p < 0.001), especially in patients with better BMD. The risk of fracture calculated by FRAX in the patients sent to a densitometry unit for bone BMD testing seems low and, probably, a better selection of the patients would detect a higher risk of fracture population. When the fracture risk is calculated with the introduction of BMD in the algorithm, it is lower than without including BMD. Analizar el riesgo de fractura calculado por FRAX y sus determinantes en los pacientes remitidos a una unidad de densitometría ósea para evaluación de la densidad mineral ósea (DMO). Los pacientes remitidos desde Atención Primaria a la Unidad de Densitometría para evaluación de la DMO rellenaron un cuestionario autoadministrado acerca de los factores de riesgo clínicos incluidos en el FRAX; se les realizó una densitometría ósea. Con los datos del cuestionario, se analizó el riesgo absoluto de presentar una fractura mayor (MFR) y de cadera (HFR). Ambos riesgos se calcularon con o sin la inclusión de la DMO en el algoritmo: MFR+, MFR-, HFR+ y HFR-. Se analizaron los datos de 853 mujeres con una edad media de 61,9 (8,9) años y un índice de masa corporal medio de 27,0 (4,2) kg/m2. El 20% de las pacientes tenía una DMO normal, el 55% tenía osteopenia y el 25%, osteoporosis. Excluyendo la edad y el índice de masa corporal, el número de factores de riesgo de fractura fue bajo. El MFR+ medio fue de 5,4 (4,8)%; el MFR- de 6,3 (5,5)%; el HFR+, de 1,5 (2,9)%; y el HFR- de 2,1 (3,3)%. Cuando se incluyeron los valores densitométricos en el algoritmo de cálculo del riesgo de fractura, éste fue significativamente menor (p < 0,001), especialmente en pacientes con mejor DMO. En nuestro medio, el riesgo de fractura calculado por FRAX en las pacientes remitidas a la unidad de densitometría para evaluación de la DMO es bajo. El riesgo de fractura es inferior cuando se introduce la DMO en el algoritmo de cálculo." @default.
• W4242847319 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4242847319 creator A5008485597 @default.
• W4242847319 creator A5013724545 @default.
• W4242847319 creator A5035309374 @default.
• W4242847319 creator A5065180599 @default.
• W4242847319 creator A5085699641 @default.
• W4242847319 creator A5089828541 @default.
• W4242847319 date "2012-07-01" @default.
• W4242847319 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4242847319 title "The activity of a Spanish bone densitometry unit revisited under the point of view of FRAX" @default.
• W4242847319 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reumae.2012.06.014" @default.
• W4242847319 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W4242847319 type Work @default.
• W4242847319 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4242847319 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4242847319 hasAuthorship W4242847319A5008485597 @default.
• W4242847319 hasAuthorship W4242847319A5013724545 @default.
• W4242847319 hasAuthorship W4242847319A5035309374 @default.
• W4242847319 hasAuthorship W4242847319A5065180599 @default.
• W4242847319 hasAuthorship W4242847319A5085699641 @default.
• W4242847319 hasAuthorship W4242847319A5089828541 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C136496925 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2775854910 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2776886416 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2777083390 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2777525943 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2778885795 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2779329777 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C2994343686 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C126322002 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C136496925 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C199343813 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2775854910 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2776541429 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2776886416 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2777083390 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2777525943 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2778885795 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2779329777 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2908647359 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C29694066 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2989005 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C2994343686 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C71924100 @default.
• W4242847319 hasConceptScore W4242847319C99454951 @default.
• W4242847319 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4242847319 hasLocation W42428473191 @default.
• W4242847319 hasOpenAccess W4242847319 @default.
• W4242847319 hasPrimaryLocation W42428473191 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W169277 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W2026132755 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W2027977119 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W2081115542 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W2402240180 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W2566312653 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W2741014853 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W4319063456 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W4321794423 @default.
• W4242847319 hasRelatedWork W2341974727 @default.
• W4242847319 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W4242847319 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4242847319 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4242847319 workType "article" @default.