FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4243205630> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4243205630 abstract "Background The number of surgical techniques for decompression and solid interbody fusion as a treatment for cervical spondylosis has increased rapidly, but the rationale for the choice between different techniques is unclear. Objectives The goal of this study was to determine which method of anterior cervical interbody fusion at a single or double‐level provides the best clinical and radiological outcome in patients with degenerative disc disease. Search methods Studies were identified with a computer‐assisted search of electronic databases in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to 2004), EMBASE (1980 to 2004), and Current Contents (1996 to 2004). We also searched references of selected articles. Selection criteria With the aid of a checklist, two authors independently screened the identified references. Consensus was reached through negotiation. A third author was consulted if consensus could not be reached. Inclusion criteria included: articles were reports of randomised comparative studies; treatments compared anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion techniques, participants were individuals scheduled for surgery for a chronic (longer than 12 weeks) diagnosis of degenerative disc disease. Data collection and analysis Methodological quality was assessed independently by two authors, using the van Tulder list of criteria. With the aid of a data extraction form, data was extracted independently by two authors on group characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures. Main results Fourteen studies with 939 patients evaluated three comparisons of different fusion techniques. From these comparisons it appears that discectomy alone has a shorter operation time, hospital stay, and post‐operative absence from work than discectomy with fusion, while there is no statistical difference for pain relief and rate of fusion. It also appears that fusion techniques that use autograft give a better chance for fusion than interbody fusion techniques that use a cage, but other outcome variables could not be combined. Authors' conclusions The low quality of the trials prohibits extensive conclusions from this review. More studies with better methodology and reporting are needed. There should be a more general agreement between researchers on which outcome parameters should be used in the evaluation of anterior cervical fusion procedures." @default.
• W4243205630 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4243205630 creator A5014193186 @default.
• W4243205630 creator A5039382471 @default.
• W4243205630 creator A5042500120 @default.
• W4243205630 creator A5052746703 @default.
• W4243205630 creator A5069399106 @default.
• W4243205630 creator A5072675038 @default.
• W4243205630 date "2004-10-18" @default.
• W4243205630 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4243205630 title "Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease" @default.
• W4243205630 cites W142910800 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W1495026300 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W1967936249 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W1972340347 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W1976664000 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W1978683770 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W1984961609 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W1987978492 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2000925045 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2005891189 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2007569107 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2007818305 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2015163612 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2015878333 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2020323361 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2021338788 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2033940599 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2034339388 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2037170571 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2037454740 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2043199083 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2043651133 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2047850545 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2052046917 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2056324684 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2059698074 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2060295541 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2064296154 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2067085310 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2073078796 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2086655810 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2088465993 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2090489581 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2094215776 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2095298446 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2129034940 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2151684674 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2157707745 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2164804228 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2315792534 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2322621390 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2331949619 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2470864563 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W2790313756 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W3175063408 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W4295355058 @default.
• W4243205630 cites W4361867989 @default.
• W4243205630 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004958" @default.
• W4243205630 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15495130" @default.
• W4243205630 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W4243205630 type Work @default.
• W4243205630 citedByCount "27" @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302012 @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302015 @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302016 @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302017 @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302018 @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302019 @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302021 @default.
• W4243205630 countsByYear W42432056302022 @default.
• W4243205630 crossrefType "reference-entry" @default.
• W4243205630 hasAuthorship W4243205630A5014193186 @default.
• W4243205630 hasAuthorship W4243205630A5039382471 @default.
• W4243205630 hasAuthorship W4243205630A5042500120 @default.
• W4243205630 hasAuthorship W4243205630A5052746703 @default.
• W4243205630 hasAuthorship W4243205630A5069399106 @default.
• W4243205630 hasAuthorship W4243205630A5072675038 @default.
• W4243205630 hasBestOaLocation W42432056302 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C190892606 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2777466982 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2778019773 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2778051963 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2781430139 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W4243205630 hasConcept C44575665 @default.

• next