FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4243678857> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4243678857 endingPage "746" @default.
• W4243678857 startingPage "744" @default.
• W4243678857 abstract "We addressed whether salvage of upper pole renal units in comparison to partial nephrectomy affects differential renal function in patients with a duplicated obstructed upper pole.We retrospectively reviewed the records of all children who underwent surgery for a unilateral obstructed duplicated kidney at our institution from 1988 to 1995. Patients were evaluated with respect to postoperative complications, reoperation rate and percent change in differential renal function of the obstructed duplicated kidney, as determined by nuclear renography.We identified 46 patients with a unilateral obstructed upper pole of a duplicated kidney who were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (12 patients) underwent an upper pole salvage procedure, that is ureteropyelostomy or ureteroureterostomy, and group 2 (31 patients) underwent partial nephrectomy. Three reoperations (25%) were performed in group 1 and 1 (4%) was done in group 2. Postoperative symptomatic urinary tract infections were diagnosed in 3 group 1 patients (25%) and in 2 (8%) in group 2. Average change in ipsilateral renal function in the 8 patients who underwent upper pole salvage procedures was 2.25 +/- 2.34% (range -6 to 12). In the 8 patients who underwent upper pole nephrectomy and who also had postoperative renal scans average change in function was -1.25 +/- 4.51% (range -23 to +16).There was no statistically significant loss of relative renal function in patients treated with partial nephrectomy and no significant gain in relative renal function in those treated with an upper pole salvage procedure. The reoperation rate was higher in the upper pole salvage than in the partial nephrectomy group (25 versus 4%). While not statistically significant, we believe that this rate is clinically important. We think that partial nephrectomy should remain the preferred treatment for most patients with obstructed duplicated kidneys." @default.
• W4243678857 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4243678857 creator A5033731759 @default.
• W4243678857 creator A5042822266 @default.
• W4243678857 creator A5062024624 @default.
• W4243678857 creator A5068116868 @default.
• W4243678857 creator A5076883882 @default.
• W4243678857 creator A5078610699 @default.
• W4243678857 creator A5086246894 @default.
• W4243678857 date "1996-08-01" @default.
• W4243678857 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4243678857 title "Is There a Best Alternative to Treating the Obstructed Upper Pole?" @default.
• W4243678857 cites W1218951833 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W1977867630 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W2029804861 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W2046548208 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W2056595443 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W2410626895 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W2443388206 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W2724837540 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W2733560064 @default.
• W4243678857 cites W69049346 @default.
• W4243678857 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199608001-00050" @default.
• W4243678857 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8683774" @default.
• W4243678857 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W4243678857 type Work @default.
• W4243678857 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W4243678857 countsByYear W42436788572015 @default.
• W4243678857 countsByYear W42436788572017 @default.
• W4243678857 countsByYear W42436788572020 @default.
• W4243678857 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4243678857 hasAuthorship W4243678857A5033731759 @default.
• W4243678857 hasAuthorship W4243678857A5042822266 @default.
• W4243678857 hasAuthorship W4243678857A5062024624 @default.
• W4243678857 hasAuthorship W4243678857A5068116868 @default.
• W4243678857 hasAuthorship W4243678857A5076883882 @default.
• W4243678857 hasAuthorship W4243678857A5078610699 @default.
• W4243678857 hasAuthorship W4243678857A5086246894 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C159641895 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C2993461684 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C126322002 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C126894567 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C141071460 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C159641895 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C2780091579 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C2780227381 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C2993461684 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C71924100 @default.
• W4243678857 hasConceptScore W4243678857C77411442 @default.
• W4243678857 hasLocation W42436788571 @default.
• W4243678857 hasLocation W42436788572 @default.
• W4243678857 hasOpenAccess W4243678857 @default.
• W4243678857 hasPrimaryLocation W42436788571 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W1501238176 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W1528421299 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W1882516778 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W1999434280 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W2002262255 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W2027256805 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W2115814773 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W2413611223 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W2557468672 @default.
• W4243678857 hasRelatedWork W3216143611 @default.
• W4243678857 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4243678857 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4243678857 workType "article" @default.