FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4245082535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4245082535 abstract "Regional Energy Interconnection Gas Pipelines vs. Power Transmission Lines Comparison Hugo Alberto Carranza Hugo Alberto Carranza Bridas SAPIC Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the Latin American/Caribbean Gas & Electricity Congress, Bariloche, Argentina, April 1997. Paper Number: SPE-38226-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/38226-MS Published: April 06 1997 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Carranza, Hugo Alberto. Regional Energy Interconnection Gas Pipelines vs. Power Transmission Lines Comparison. Paper presented at the Latin American/Caribbean Gas & Electricity Congress, Bariloche, Argentina, April 1997. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/38226-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Latin American/Caribbean Gas Search Advanced Search AbstractThe countries of the Southern Cone of America are experiencing deep changes in their Energy area. The sustained growth in the demand of energy, in some cases at a yearly rate exceeding 7%, and the need of maintaining the long term cost of energy within competitive values, are moving the region to a higher energetic integration and to a diversification and optimisation of their resources.Within this new transformation scheme, the existence of large natural gas regional reserves, plus the technological advances in thermoelectric generation, using combined cycles with natural gas, and with an efficiency near to 60%, offer clearly the lower cost long run marginal alternative for power generation. The great distance that exists between the gas fields and the consumer markets, the rates of growth and the concentration of the demand in certain areas, the need for the conversion of the electrical frequency amongst Brazil and the countries of the region, are subjects that have their influence and condition the decisions regarding investments in energy. In this context, the selection of the means for transporting the energy, by Natural Gas Pipelines (NGP) or Electrical Power Transmission Lines (EPTL) is starting to be an interesting subject of study for the specialists in energy.The technical and economic comparisons performed between both transmission means allows us to arrive at some conclusions regarding the future range of application of each technology. This study submits the conclusions of the above mentioned comparison. It also shows the methodology used for its application to different situations than those assumed.IntroductionThe comparison of the means of transmission of large amounts of energy to large distances is very complex. Without disregarding other factors, we shall perform a technical-economical comparison between the power transmission using High Voltage Alternating Current HVAC and High Voltage Direct Current HVDC vs. Natural Gas Pipeline NGP for the alternative of thermal generation using Gas Turbine Combined Cycle GTCC technology, using Natural Gas as fuel. In one case locating the Power Plant in the Natural Gas Field, transporting the energy to the market by an Electrical Power Transmission Line, and in the other one considering the installation of the GTCC Power Plant in the market, transporting the fuel through a NGP.The analysis covers a large range of powers and distances that have to do with the realities of the region.Power: 1GW to 10 GW (Itaipu 12,6 GW)Length: 1000Km to 3000Km (NGP Bolivia-Brazil 1800 Km)NGP: 24 to 56 - 79/95 Kg/cm2.HVAC Transmission Line: 500, 735 KV (1150KV)HVDC Transmission Line: +/-400 KV, +/-600KVThe process of the analysis considers in the first place the technical restrictions arising from each technology, producing within this range a first selection. Keywords: power line, ngp 24, gas pipeline, pipeline, transportation, transmission, kv ngp 40, upstream oil & gas, hvac 735, hvdc 600 Subjects: Processing Systems and Design, Pipelines, Flowlines and Risers This content is only available via PDF. 1997. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download." @default.
• W4245082535 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4245082535 creator A5088983849 @default.
• W4245082535 date "1997-04-01" @default.
• W4245082535 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4245082535 title "Regional Energy Interconnection Gas Pipelines vs. Power Transmission Lines Comparison " @default.
• W4245082535 doi "https://doi.org/10.2523/38226-ms" @default.
• W4245082535 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W4245082535 type Work @default.
• W4245082535 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4245082535 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4245082535 hasAuthorship W4245082535A5088983849 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C140311924 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C158886217 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C180916674 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C206658404 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConcept C59427239 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C119599485 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C127413603 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C140311924 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C144133560 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C158886217 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C161191863 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C162853370 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C17744445 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C180916674 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C199539241 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C206658404 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C2778805511 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C39432304 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C41008148 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C548081761 @default.
• W4245082535 hasConceptScore W4245082535C59427239 @default.
• W4245082535 hasLocation W42450825351 @default.
• W4245082535 hasOpenAccess W4245082535 @default.
• W4245082535 hasPrimaryLocation W42450825351 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W163170397 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W2045321494 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W2127077531 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W2137016851 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W2288246040 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W2547213408 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W3150094324 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W4210454182 @default.
• W4245082535 hasRelatedWork W4238113343 @default.
• W4245082535 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4245082535 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4245082535 workType "article" @default.