FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4245184477> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4245184477 endingPage "37" @default.
• W4245184477 startingPage "23" @default.
• W4245184477 abstract "The general intent of this paper is to examine Hegel's preoccupation with the question of beginnings. To anticipate, in Hegel's view every account in respect to its beginning – indeed, everything in respect to its beginning – is both immediate and mediated. All things therefore begin having already begun; all things begin in medias res. But if all things begin having already begun, all things begin as a rupture of one sort or another. This necessity of rupture puts the problematic of beginnings for Hegel into clear focus: system, in order to be system, must involve closure; but because of the nature of beginnings, system must also involve rupture. A judicious view of the texts show, I think, that Hegel is not willing to give up either thesis. Consequently, if the system is to be viable, the rupture cannot efface the closure; but if the system is to begin, the closure must not efface the rupture. Rupture and closure must coexist. Hegel's concern with beginning, then, is a concern with how legitimately to initiate the system without either ignoring or effacing rupture, and without preempting the possibility of closure. In Parts One and Two I will establish Hegel's clear awareness of rupture and of the part it plays in the system. If we examine the Preface and Introduction to the Science of Logic and to the Phenomenology of 1807 we find Hegel discussing a series of ruptures – indeed a circle of ruptures – which begin with a rupture at the beginning of the Science of Logic. There is first this rupture in the system as system, instantiated in the necessary reference by the Logic back to the Phenomenology . Behind this, there is a rupture in the Phenomenology itself in its own mediated beginnings, a rupture rooted in the immediate experience of natural consciousness. Behind this second rupture there is a third, a rupture in the contemporary Zeitgeist as it is instantiated in the natural attitude of natural consciousness. This rupture takes the form of the loss in natural consciousness of traditional certitude, a loss brought about by the incursion of Kantian and post-Kantian philosophy on this natural, everyday consciousness. If we reflect back to the first rupture noted – that at the beginning of the Logic and put it into the context of this causal chain of ruptures, we see that philosophy in fact experiences a self-caused rupture. This self-caused rupture is due to philosophy's own effects on the Zeitgeist as internalized by natural consciousness at the end of the eighteenth and in the first half of the nineteenth centuries." @default.
• W4245184477 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4245184477 creator A5088029084 @default.
• W4245184477 date "1994-01-01" @default.
• W4245184477 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4245184477 title "Rupture, Closure, and Dialectic" @default.
• W4245184477 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263523200002937" @default.
• W4245184477 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
• W4245184477 type Work @default.
• W4245184477 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4245184477 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4245184477 hasAuthorship W4245184477A5088029084 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C13184196 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C146834321 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C192209626 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C32506930 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConcept C84269361 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C111472728 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C120665830 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C121332964 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C13184196 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C138885662 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C146834321 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C17744445 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C192209626 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C199539241 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C32506930 @default.
• W4245184477 hasConceptScore W4245184477C84269361 @default.
• W4245184477 hasIssue "01" @default.
• W4245184477 hasLocation W42451844771 @default.
• W4245184477 hasOpenAccess W4245184477 @default.
• W4245184477 hasPrimaryLocation W42451844771 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W1250902 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W17468546 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W24562027 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W33954084 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W38107334 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W40175096 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W41687064 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W42687922 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W46639038 @default.
• W4245184477 hasRelatedWork W6191489 @default.
• W4245184477 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W4245184477 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4245184477 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4245184477 workType "article" @default.