FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4245804392> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4245804392 endingPage "1039" @default.
• W4245804392 startingPage "1037" @default.
• W4245804392 abstract "HomeRadioGraphicsVol. 22, No. 5 PreviousNext EDUCATION EXHIBITInvited CommentaryJay P. HeikenJay P. HeikenAuthor AffiliationsMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MissouriJay P. HeikenPublished Online:Sep 1 2002https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se061037MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References 1 International Working Party. Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology 1995; 22:983-993. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Hussain SM, Zondervan PE, IJzermans JNM, Schalm SW, de Man RA, Krestin GP. Benign versus malignant hepatic nodules: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:1023-1039. Link, Google Scholar3 Farmer DG, Rosove MH, Shaked A, Busuttil RW. Current treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 1994; 219:236-247. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Livraghi T, Bolondi L, Lazzarona S, et al. Percutaneous ethanol injection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: a study on 207 patients. Cancer 1992; 69:925-929. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, et al. Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology 1991; 178:493-497. Link, Google Scholar6 Hayashi M, Matsui O, Ueda K, et al. Correlation between the blood supply and grade of malignancy of hepatocellular nodules associated with liver cirrhosis: evaluation by CT during intraarterial injection of contrast medium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:969-976. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Ueda K, Terada T, Nakanuma Y, et al. Vascular supply in adenomatous hyperplasia of the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma: a morphometric study. Hum Pathol 1992; 23:619-626. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Roncalli M, Roz E, Coggi G, et al. The vascular profile of regenerative and dysplastic nodules of the cirrhotic liver: implications for diagnosis and classification. Hepatology 1999; 30:1174-1178. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Matsui O, Ueda K, Kobayashi S, et al. Intra- and perinodular hemodynamics of hepatocellular carcinoma: CT observation during intra-arterial contrast injection. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:147-156. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Lim JH, Cho JM, Kim EY, Park CK. Dysplastic nodules in liver cirrhosis: evaluation of hemodynamics with CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Radiology 2000; 214:869-874. Link, Google Scholar11 Earls JP, Theise ND, Weinreb JC, et al. Dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma: thin-sec-tion MR imaging of explanted cirrhotic livers with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 201:207-214. Link, Google Scholar12 Choi BI, Han JK, Hong SH, et al. Dysplastic nodules of the liver: imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24:250-257. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Choi BI, Takayasu K, Han MC. Small hepatocellular carcinomas and associated nodular lesions of the liver: pathology, pathogenesis, and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:1177-1187. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, et al. Adenomatous hyperplastic nodules in the cirrhotic liver: differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma with MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 173:123-126. Link, Google Scholar15 Winter TC, Takayasu K, Maramatsu Y, et al. Early advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of CT and MR appearance with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994; 192:379-387. Link, Google Scholar16 Kadoya M, Matsui O, Takashima T, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology 1992; 183:819-825. Link, Google Scholar17 Ebara M, Ohto M, Watanabe Y, et al. Diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation of MR imaging and tumor histologic studies. Radiology 1986; 159:371-377. Link, Google Scholar18 Inoue E, Kuroda C, Fujita M, et al. MR features of various histological grades of small hepatocellular carcinomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:75-79. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Oi H, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. Dynamic MR imaging and early phase helical CT for detecting intrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:369-374. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Ebara M, Fukuda H, Kojima Y, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship of signal intensity to histopathologic findings and metal content of the tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma. Radiology 1999; 210:81-88. Link, Google Scholar21 Yamashita Y, Fan ZM, Yumamoto H, et al. Spin-echo and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histopathologic findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 4:83-90. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Monzawa S, Omata K, Shimatzu N, Yagawa A, Hosoda K, Araki T. Well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: findings of US, CT, and MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24:392-397. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Murakami T, Kuroda C, Marukawa T, et al. Regenerating nodules of hepatic cirrhosis: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 155:1227-1231. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Ohtomo K, Itai K, Ohtomo Y, et al. Regenerating nodules of liver cirrhosis: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990; 154:505-507. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar25 Lee HM, Lu DSK, Krasny RM, Busuttil R, Kadell B, Lucas J. Hepatic lesion characterization in cirrhosis: significance of arterial phase hypervascularity on dual-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:125-130. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Krinsky GA, Theise ND, Rofsky NM, Mizrachi H, Tepperman LW, Weinreb JC. Dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver: arterial phase enhancement at CT and MR imaging—a case report. Radiology 1998; 209:461-464. Link, Google Scholar27 Jeong YY, Mitchell DG, Kamishima T. Small (<20 mm) enhancing hepatic nodules seen on arterial phase MR imaging of the cirrhotic liver: clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:1327-1334. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Park YN, Yang CP, Fernandez G, Cubukcu O, Thung SN, Theise ND. Neoangiogenesis and sinusoidal “capillarization” in dysplastic nodules of the liver. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22:656-662. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Baron RL, Marsh W, Oliver JH, 3rd, Confer S, Hunt LE, Peterson MS. Screening cirrhosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with helical contrast CT: specificity (abstr). Radiology 1997; 205(P):143. Google Scholar30 Yu JS, Kim KW, Jeong MG, Lee JT, Yoo HS. Nontumorous hepatic arterial-portal venous shunts: MR imaging findings. Radiology 2000; 217:750-756. Link, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: Sept 2002 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByClinical Radiology, Vol. 59, No. 2Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 22, No. 5 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W4245804392 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4245804392 creator A5060852973 @default.
• W4245804392 date "2002-09-01" @default.
• W4245804392 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4245804392 title "Invited Commentary" @default.
• W4245804392 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se061037" @default.
• W4245804392 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W4245804392 type Work @default.
• W4245804392 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4245804392 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4245804392 hasAuthorship W4245804392A5060852973 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C2777214474 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C2778019345 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C2778721783 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C41260117 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C126322002 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C17744445 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C199539241 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C2777214474 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C2778019345 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C2778721783 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C2779473830 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C41260117 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C71924100 @default.
• W4245804392 hasConceptScore W4245804392C90924648 @default.
• W4245804392 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4245804392 hasLocation W42458043921 @default.
• W4245804392 hasOpenAccess W4245804392 @default.
• W4245804392 hasPrimaryLocation W42458043921 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2008626862 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2023691039 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2026902286 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2034000389 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2148441798 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2255318257 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2266860383 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2324406516 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W2412677110 @default.
• W4245804392 hasRelatedWork W3030449887 @default.
• W4245804392 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W4245804392 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4245804392 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4245804392 workType "article" @default.