FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4246067597> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4246067597 endingPage "1356" @default.
• W4246067597 startingPage "1356" @default.
• W4246067597 abstract "This report from Oslo, Norway [1Wagner K. Risnes I. Berntsen T. et al.Clinical and psychosocial follow-up study of children treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84: 1349-1356Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar] reviews 22 consecutive survivors of either cardiac (n = 13) or respiratory (n = 9) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with careful neurocognitive testing on an average of 6 years after ECMO support. The authors found that 73% of these children had some neurologic impairment. On neurologic motor examination, 45% of the children were categorized as having mild-to-moderate impairment, and 27% exhibited severe impairment, with 5 children having microcephaly. Of the 14 children who underwent magnetic resonance imaging, 8 (57%) had evidence of ischemic injury. A full 50% of these children had an abnormal electroencephalogram and 45% had significant cognitive disability. Despite these depressing figures, it was found that 64% of the parents underestimated the degree of deficits in their children and 54% of the parents believed that their children had minimal or no deficits whatsoever.These sobering figures remind us that despite what seems to be a brilliant clinical success with advanced technology (ie, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]), the days of looking merely at hospital survival as a marker of success are vanishing. It is clear that these ECMO survivors require formal neurocognitive testing with time recognizing that a majority will have significant clinical impairment that will affect their everyday life negatively. Once this is recognized, these children should be appropriately directed to special schooling or therapeutic intervention as indicated. We can not rely on the parents to recognize these deficits as indicated by this article, because we must resort to objective clinical testing.Despite our apparent clinical success in the short term, it seems that we have uncovered a new set of problems in children who previously would have never survived to exhibit these problems. Clearly, sobering reports, such as this one in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, stress the importance of long-term objective follow-up of survivors of many of the seemingly magical surgical feats that we can perform today. Furthermore, follow-up series, such as this one, underscore the importance of examining our current techniques by not only optimizing recovery of the heart and lungs, but also by attempting to protect the brain in the process. This report from Oslo, Norway [1Wagner K. Risnes I. Berntsen T. et al.Clinical and psychosocial follow-up study of children treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84: 1349-1356Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar] reviews 22 consecutive survivors of either cardiac (n = 13) or respiratory (n = 9) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with careful neurocognitive testing on an average of 6 years after ECMO support. The authors found that 73% of these children had some neurologic impairment. On neurologic motor examination, 45% of the children were categorized as having mild-to-moderate impairment, and 27% exhibited severe impairment, with 5 children having microcephaly. Of the 14 children who underwent magnetic resonance imaging, 8 (57%) had evidence of ischemic injury. A full 50% of these children had an abnormal electroencephalogram and 45% had significant cognitive disability. Despite these depressing figures, it was found that 64% of the parents underestimated the degree of deficits in their children and 54% of the parents believed that their children had minimal or no deficits whatsoever. These sobering figures remind us that despite what seems to be a brilliant clinical success with advanced technology (ie, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]), the days of looking merely at hospital survival as a marker of success are vanishing. It is clear that these ECMO survivors require formal neurocognitive testing with time recognizing that a majority will have significant clinical impairment that will affect their everyday life negatively. Once this is recognized, these children should be appropriately directed to special schooling or therapeutic intervention as indicated. We can not rely on the parents to recognize these deficits as indicated by this article, because we must resort to objective clinical testing. Despite our apparent clinical success in the short term, it seems that we have uncovered a new set of problems in children who previously would have never survived to exhibit these problems. Clearly, sobering reports, such as this one in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, stress the importance of long-term objective follow-up of survivors of many of the seemingly magical surgical feats that we can perform today. Furthermore, follow-up series, such as this one, underscore the importance of examining our current techniques by not only optimizing recovery of the heart and lungs, but also by attempting to protect the brain in the process. Clinical and Psychosocial Follow-Up Study of Children Treated With Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 84Issue 4PreviewSerious heart and pulmonary failure may be treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The aim of this follow-up study was a multimodal assessment of outcome in children surviving ECMO at our hospital from 1991 to 2004. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W4246067597 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4246067597 creator A5087767646 @default.
• W4246067597 date "2007-10-01" @default.
• W4246067597 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4246067597 title "Invited commentary" @default.
• W4246067597 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.101" @default.
• W4246067597 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17888997" @default.
• W4246067597 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W4246067597 type Work @default.
• W4246067597 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4246067597 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4246067597 hasAuthorship W4246067597A5087767646 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C150966472 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C172467417 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C2776858399 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C2780409771 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C2989058681 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C118552586 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C138885662 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C150966472 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C169900460 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C172467417 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C177713679 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C187212893 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C2776035688 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C2776858399 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C2780409771 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C2989058681 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C41895202 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C42219234 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C71924100 @default.
• W4246067597 hasConceptScore W4246067597C99508421 @default.
• W4246067597 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4246067597 hasLocation W42460675971 @default.
• W4246067597 hasLocation W42460675972 @default.
• W4246067597 hasOpenAccess W4246067597 @default.
• W4246067597 hasPrimaryLocation W42460675971 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W2023606060 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W2057139550 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W2106801818 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W2958761511 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W3006651683 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W3114486991 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W4283809567 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W4322723566 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W4322729425 @default.
• W4246067597 hasRelatedWork W1777239160 @default.
• W4246067597 hasVolume "84" @default.
• W4246067597 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4246067597 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4246067597 workType "article" @default.