FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4246377547> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4246377547 endingPage "793" @default.
• W4246377547 startingPage "792" @default.
• W4246377547 abstract "PsychophysiologyVolume 54, Issue 5 p. 792-793 CorrigendumFree Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: Contextualizing individual differences in error monitoring: Links with impulsivity, negative affect, and conscientiousness Kaylin E. Hill, Douglas B. Samuel, Dan Foti, Volume 53Issue 8Psychophysiology pages: 1143-1153 First Published online: May 19, 2016 First published: 19 April 2017 https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12861AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL While working on a follow-up project, the authors of Hill, Samuel and Foti (2016) found an error wherein approximately fifty percent of the study data was affected. They have corrected this error, and the corrected results are shared here. Most importantly, the key findings remain unchanged: while bivariate relationships with conscientiousness and negative urgency are small and non-significant, there is an interaction between those traits in predicting ERN amplitude. However, the specific facets within conscientiousness driving this relationship seem to be achievement and self-discipline. The abstract has been amended and the corrected tables shown below: Abstract: The error-related negativity (ERN) is a neural measure of error processing that has been implicated as a neurobehavioral trait and has transdiagnostic links with psychopathology. Few studies, however, have contextualized this trait like component with regard to dimensions of personality that, as intermediate constructs, may aid in contextualizing links with psychopathology. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to examine the interrelationships between error monitoring and dimensions of personality within a large adult sample (N = 208). Building on previous research, we found that the ERN relates to a combination of negative affect, impulsivity, and conscientiousness. Facets of conscientiousness and negative urgency (i.e., impulsivity in the context of negative affect) interacted to predict variation in ERN amplitude. This relationship was driven specifically by the conscientiousness facets of achievement and self-discipline. Links between personality measures and error positivity amplitude were weaker and nonsignificant. Slower reaction time was related to conscientiousness and sensation-seeking, a specific facet of impulsivity, was related to quicker reaction time. These findings suggest that, in the general population, error processing is modulated by the joint combination of negative affect, impulsivity, and conscientiousness (i.e., the profile across traits), perhaps more so than any one dimension alone. This work may inform future research concerning aberrant error processing in clinical populations. Table 2. Bivariate Correlations % correct RT (error) RT (correct) Post-error slowing Δ ERN Δ Pe Negative Urgency .06 .01 .04 .00 .08 −.04 Positive Urgency −.09 −.05 −.03 .03 .12 −.09 Lack of premeditation −.05 −.11 −.12 −.01 .07 −.05 Lack of perseverance −.13 −.11 −.08 −.02 .04 −.03 Sensation seeking −.13* −.19** −.20** −.12 −.01 .06 Neuroticism −.01 −.02 .03 .03 .09 −.04 Anxiousness .10 .08 .04 −.01 .02 −.05 Angry hostility .07 .01 .06 .14* −.01 −.08 Depressiveness −.01 −.01 .10 .00 .05 −.04 Self-consciousness −.09 −.02 −.04 −.04 .10 .10 Impulsivity −.10 −.15* −.13 .05 .08 −.06 Vulnerability −.01 .01 .10 −.03 .12 .00 Extraversion .05 .07 −.01 .02 .12 −.01 Openness .02 .00 −.05 −.03 .06 .01 Agreeableness −.01 .11 .06 .14* .11 .10 Conscientiousness .05 .16* .17* .06 .02 −.05 Competence .04 .13 .12 −.05 .09 .03 Order .07 .21** .22** .01 −.07 −.03 Dutifulness .09 .10 .14* .03 .09 −.03 Achievement .03 .06 .06 .12 −.01 −.07 Self-discipline .04 .08 .10 .11 .01 −.04 Deliberation −.03 .11 .11 .02 .01 −.06 Age .14* .31** .37** .09 −.01 −.21** Note. A total of 212 participants were included in this analysis. Post-error slowing is the difference between correct trials following error trials and correct trials following correct trials. ERP values are the difference between error and correct trials. *p < .05 **p < .01 Table 3. Hierarchical Regression Predicting ERN Difference Amplitude Variable B SE (B) β t p ΔR2 Step one: Demographic information % Correct .04 Step two: Cons facets: Competence .55 .33 .14 1.65 .10 Order −.77 .34 −.19 −2.25 .03* Dutifulness .75 .37 .18 2.06 .04* Achievement −.29 .37 −.07 −.77 .44 Self-Discipline .05 .39 .01 .12 .91 Deliberation .05 .33 .01 .14 .89 Negative urgency .33 .28 .08 1.16 .25 .05 Step three: Competence X NU .21 .36 .22 .58 .57 Order X NU −.13 .34 −.13 −.39 .70 Dutifulness X NU −.36 .43 −.38 −.84 .40 Achievement X NU −.85 .40 −.83 −2.12 .04* Self-Discipline X NU 1.27 .40 .33 3.22 .00** Deliberation X NU −.09 .38 −.09 −.24 .81 .05 Step four: Competence X NU .21 .36 .22 .59 .56 Order X NU −.13 .34 −.12 −.36 .72 Dutifulness X NU −.37 .44 −.38 −.85 .40 Achievement X NU −.85 .40 −.84 −2.12 .04* Self-Discipline X NU 1.27 .40 .33 3.22 .00** Deliberation X NU −.10 .39 −.10 −.26 .80 Neuroticism −.02 .09 −.01 −.17 .87 .00 Note. Cons = conscientiousness; NU = negative urgency. Demographic information in step one of analysis included age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Step four of the analysis was added to the model in order to demonstrate the effects of conscientiousness facets and negative urgency above and beyond neuroticism. Here, neuroticism is composed of the anxiousness, angry hostility, depressiveness, self-consciousness, and vulnerability facets but not the impulsivity facet. A total of 210 participants were included in this analysis. *p < .05 **p < .01 Reference Hill, K. E., Samuel, D. B., & Foti, D. (2016). Contextualizing individual differences in error monitoring: Links with impulsivity, negative affect, and conscientiousness. Psychophysiology, 53: 1143– 1153. doi:10.1111/psyp.12671 Volume54, Issue5May 2017Pages 792-793 ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W4246377547 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4246377547 date "2017-04-19" @default.
• W4246377547 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4246377547 title "Corrigendum" @default.
• W4246377547 cites W2406422380 @default.
• W4246377547 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12861" @default.
• W4246377547 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28421652" @default.
• W4246377547 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W4246377547 type Work @default.
• W4246377547 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4246377547 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4246377547 hasBestOaLocation W42463775471 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C106934330 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C127816348 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C172141706 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C2780319597 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C2865642 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C64341305 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C105795698 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C106934330 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C127816348 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C136764020 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C138496976 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C15744967 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C172141706 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C180747234 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C187288502 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C199360897 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C2778805511 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C2780319597 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C2865642 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C33923547 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C41008148 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C64341305 @default.
• W4246377547 hasConceptScore W4246377547C77805123 @default.
• W4246377547 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4246377547 hasLocation W42463775471 @default.
• W4246377547 hasLocation W42463775472 @default.
• W4246377547 hasOpenAccess W4246377547 @default.
• W4246377547 hasPrimaryLocation W42463775471 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W2072767864 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W2088165004 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W2088341947 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W2128623648 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W2145353363 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W2375995339 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W2791312024 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W3110144904 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W3185221230 @default.
• W4246377547 hasRelatedWork W3195621402 @default.
• W4246377547 hasVolume "54" @default.
• W4246377547 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4246377547 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4246377547 workType "article" @default.