FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4246397740> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4246397740 endingPage "61" @default.
• W4246397740 startingPage "42" @default.
• W4246397740 abstract "No AccessJun 2015Results and Evidence about Social Safety NetsAuthors/Editors: World BankWorld BankSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0543-1_section4AboutView ChaptersFull TextPDF (1.1 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract: Discusses the performance of social safety nets in improving equity by redistributing resources from the rich towards the poor and vulnerable, specifically examining the impacts on reducing poverty. Poverty remains multidimensional, mostly the result of multiple sectorial policies and social safety nets which only partially work. Expanding to 112 countries (56 more than the previous edition), the Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity (ASPIRE) indicators based on harmonized household surveys can now estimate how social safety nets transfers (cash, in kind, near cash) contribute to reduce the pre-transfer poverty and inequality along the program performance results chain. Other social safety nets impact areas include (1) education, (2) nutrition, (3) health, and (4) productive assets. The ultimate goal of social protection and labor systems remains to help individuals and societies manage risk and volatility by increasing resilience to shocks, increasing equity, and improving access to opportunities generated by economic growth. ReferencesAbramovsky, L, O Attanasio, K Barron, P Carneiro, and G Stoye. 2014. “Challenges to Promoting Social Inclusion of the Extreme Poor: Evidence from a Large-Scale Experiment in Colombia.” IFS Working Paper 14/33, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London. Google ScholarAkresh, R, D De Walque, and H Kazianga. 2013. “Cash Transfers and Child Schooling: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation of the Role of Conditionality.” Policy Research Working Paper 6340, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarAlam, Andaleeb, J Baez, and X Del Carpio. 2011. “Does Cash for School Influence Young Women’s Behavior in the Longer Term? Evidence from Pakistan.” IZA Discussion Papers 5703, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. Google ScholarAlzúa, M L, G Cruces, and L Ripani. 2014. “Welfare Programs and Labor Supply in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from Latin America.” Journal of Population Economics 26 (4): 1255–84. CrossrefGoogle ScholarAmerican Institutes for Research. 2013. Zambia’s Child Grant Program: 24-Month Impact Report. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Google ScholarAttanasio, O, S Cattan, E Fitzsimons, C Meghir, and M Rubio-Codina. 2015. “Estimating the Production Function for Human Capital: Results from a Randomized Control Trial in Colombia.” IZA Discussion Paper 8856, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. Google ScholarBaez, J E and A Camacho. 2011. “Assessing the Long-Term Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers on Human Capital: Evidence from Colombia.” Policy Research Working Paper 5681, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarBarham, T, K Macours, J A Maluccio, F Regalia, V Aguilera, and M E Moncada. 2014. Assessing Long-Term Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfers on Children and Young Adults in Rural Nicaragua. Impact Evaluation Report 17. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. Google ScholarBarker, M, D Filmer, and J Rigolini. 2015. Evaluating Food versus Cash Assistance in Rural Cambodia. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google ScholarBraido, L H, P Olinto, and H Perrone. 2012. “Gender Bias in Intrahousehold Allocation: Evidence from an Unintentional Experiment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 94 (2): 552–65. CrossrefGoogle ScholarChaudhury, N, J Friedman, and J Onishi. 2014. Philippines Conditional Cash Transfer Program: Impact Evaluation 2012. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google ScholarChioda, L, J M De Mello, and R R Soares. 2012. Spillovers from Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Bolsa Família and Crime in Urban Brazil. World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarCovarrubias, K, B Davis, and P Winters. 2012. “From Protection to Production: Productive Impacts of the Malawi Social Cash Transfer Scheme.” Journal of Development Effectiveness 4 (1): 50–77. CrossrefGoogle ScholarCunha, J M 2014. “Testing Paternalism: Cash versus In-kind Transfers.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6 (2): 195–230. CrossrefGoogle ScholarDaidone, S, B Davis, J Dewbre, and K Covvarubias. 2014. Lesotho’s Child Grant Programme: 24-Month Impact Report on Productive Activities and Labour Allocation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Google ScholarDasso, R and F Fernandez. 2014. Temptation Goods and Conditional Cash Transfers in Peru. Washington, DC: International Food and Policy Research Institute. Google ScholarDavies, S and J Davey. 2008. “A Regional Multiplier Approach to Estimating the Impact of Cash Transfers on the Market: The Case of Cash Transfers in Rural Malawi.” Development Policy Review 26 (1): 91–111. CrossrefGoogle ScholarDe Brauw, A, D Gilligan, J Hoddinott, V Moreira, and S Roy. 2012. The Impact of Bolsa Familia on Child, Maternal, and Household Welfare. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Resarch Institute. Google ScholarEvans, D, S Hausladen, K Kosec, and N Reese. 2014. Community-Based Conditional Cash Transfers in Tanzania: Results from a Randomized Trial. Washington, DC: World Bank. LinkGoogle ScholarEvans, David K and A Popova. 2014. “Cash Transfers and Temptation Goods: A Review of Global Evidence.” Policy Research Working Paper 6886, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarFerré, C and I Sharif. 2014. “Can Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Education and Nutrition Outcomes for Poor Children in Bangladesh? Evidence from a Pilot Project.” Policy Research Working Paper 7077, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarGentilini, U. 2014. “Our Daily Bread: What Is the Evidence on Comparing Cash versus Food Transfers?” Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper 1420, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarGertler, P J, J Heckman, R Pinto, A Zanolini, C Vermeersch, and S Walker. 2013. “Labor Market Returns to Early Childhood Stimulation: A 20-Year Follow-Up to an Experimental Intervention in Jamaica.” NBER Working Paper 19185, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGertler, P J, S W Martinez, and M Rubio-Codina. 2012. “Investing Cash Transfers to Raise Long-Term Living Standards.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4 (1): 164–92. CrossrefGoogle ScholarHaushofer, J and J Shapiro. 2013. Household Response to Income Changes: Evidence from an Unconditional Cash Transfer Program in Kenya. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://www.princeton.edu/~joha/publications/Haushofer_Shapiro_UCT_2013.pdf. Google ScholarHidrobo, M, J Hoddinott, A Margolies, V Moreira, and A Peterman. 2012. Impact Evaluation of Cash, Food Vouchers, and Food Transfers among Colombian Refugees and Poor Ecuadorians in Carchi and Sucumbíos. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Google ScholarHoddinott, J, G Berhane, D O Gilligan, N Kumar, and A S Taffesse. 2012. “The Impact of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Programme and Related Transfers on Agricultural Productivity.” Journal of African Economies 21 (5): 761–86. CrossrefGoogle ScholarHoddinott, J, J A Maluccio, J R Behrman, R Flores, and R Martorell. 2008. “Effect of a Nutrition Intervention during Early Childhood on Economic Productivity in Guatemalan Adults.” The Lancet 371 (9610): 411–16. CrossrefGoogle ScholarJung, H and A Hasan. 2014. “The Impact of Early Childhood Education on Early Achievement Gaps: Evidence from the Indonesia Early Childhood Education and Development (ECED) Project.” Policy Research Working Paper 6794, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarKagin, J, E Taylor, F Alfani, and B Davis. 2014. Local Economy-wide Impact Evaluation (LEWIE) of Ethiopia’s Social Cash Transfer Pilot Programme. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Google ScholarLarranaga, O, D Contreras, and J Ruiz-Tagle. 2012. “Impact Evaluation of Chile Solidario: Lessons and Policy Recommendations.” Journal of Latin American Studies 44 (02): 347–72. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMacours, K, P Premand, and R Vakis. 2012. “Transfers, Diversification and Household Risk Strategies: Experimental Evidence with Lessons for Climate Change Adaptation.” Policy Research Working Paper 6053, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarMartorano, B and M Sanfilippo. 2012. “Innovative Features in Conditional Cash Transfers: An Impact Evaluation of Chile Solidario on Households and Children.” Innocenti Working Paper 2012-03, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence, Italy. Google ScholarMeller, M and S Litschig. 2014. “Saving Lives: Evidence from a Conditional Food Supplementation Program.” Journal of Human Resources 49 (4): 1014–52. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMerttens, F, A Hurrell, M Marzi, R Attah, M Farhat, A Kardan, and I MacAuslan. 2013. Kenya Hunger Safety Net Programme Monitoring and Evaluation Component. Impact Evaluation Final Report: 2009 to 2012. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Policy Management Limited. Google ScholarOrbeta Jr, A, A Abdon, M del Mundo, M Tutor, M T Valera, and D Yarcia. 2014. Keeping Children Healthy and in School: Evaluating the Pantawid Pamilya Using Regression Discontinuity Design Second Wave Impact Evaluation Results. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google ScholarOsei-Akoto, I, S Bawakyillenuo, G Owusu, E Larbi Offei, C Yaw Okyere, and I Komla Agbelie. 2014. Short-Term Impact Evaluation Report: Labour-Intensive Public Works (LIPW) of Ghana Social Opportunities Project (GSOP). Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER), University of Ghana. Google ScholarPellerano, L, M Moratti, M Jakobsen, M Bajgar, and V Barca. 2014. Child Grants Programme Impact Evaluation. Follow-Up Report. Oxford Policy Management for the European Union, UNICEF, and the Food and Agriculture Organization. Google ScholarPerova, E and R Vakis. 2012. 5 Years in Juntos: New Evidence on the Program’s Short- and Long-Term Impacts. Economía 35 (69): 53–82. Google ScholarRawat, R, E Faust, J A Maluccio, and S Kadiyala. 2014. “The Impact of a Food Assistance Program on Nutritional Status, Disease Progression, and Food Security among People Living with HIV in Uganda.” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 66 (1): e15–22. CrossrefGoogle ScholarRosas, N and S Sabarwal. 2014. Opportunity and Resilience: Do Public Works Have It All? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Sierra Leone. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google ScholarRubio, G M 2012. “Building Results Frameworks for Safety Nets Projects.” Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper 73703, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarSeidenfeld, D, S Handa, and G Tembo. 2013. 24-Month Impact Report for the Child Grant Programme. Ministry of Community Development, Mother and Child Health, Government of Zambia. Google ScholarSeidenfeld, D, S Handa, G Tembo, S Michelo, C Harland Scott, and L Prencipe. 2014. The Impact of an Unconditional Cash Transfer on Food Security and Nutrition: The Zambia Child Grant Programme. Brighton, U.K.: Institute of Development Studies. Google ScholarTaylor, E, K Thome, B Davis, D Seidenfeld, and S Handa. 2014. Evaluating Local General Equilibrium Impacts of Zimbabwe’s Harmonized Social Cash Transfer Programme. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Google ScholarThome, K, J Taylor, B Davis, S Handa, D Seidenfeld, and G Tembo. 2014. Local Economy-wide Impact Evaluation (LEWIE) of Zambia’s Child Grant Programme. PtoP Project Report. Food and Agriculture Organization, UNICEF, and the World Bank. Google ScholarThome, K, J E Taylor, J Kagin, B Davis, R Osei Darko, and I Osei-Akoto. 2014. Local Economy-wide Impact Evaluation (LEWIE) of Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment against Poverty (LEAP) Programme. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Google ScholarTirivayi, N, M Knowles, and B Davis. 2013. The Interaction between Social Protection and Agriculture: A Review of Evidence. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Google ScholarWalker, S P, S M Chang, M Vera-Hernandez, and S Grantham-McGregor. 2011. “Early Childhood Stimulation Benefits Adult Competence and Reduces Violent Behavior.” Pediatrics 127 (5): 849–57. CrossrefGoogle ScholarWorld Bank. 2011. Program Keluarga Harapan: Main Findings from the Impact Evaluation of Indonesia’s Pilot Household Conditional Cash Transfer Program. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google ScholarWeblinksASPIRE (The Atlas of Social Protection: Indicators of Resilience and Equity), World Bank, www.worldbank.org/aspire/. Google ScholarDIME’s IE Working Paper Series, http://go.worldbank.org/69LQQAL850. Google Scholar3IE’s Impact Evaluation Repository, http://www.3ieimpact.org/evidence/impact-evaluations/. Google ScholarWorld Bank’s Development Impact Blog Series, http://blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluations/. Google ScholarReferencesFerré, C and I Sharif. 2014. “Can Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Education and Nutrition Outcomes for Poor Children in Bangladesh? Evidence from a Pilot Project.” Policy Research Working Paper 7077, World Bank, Washington, DC. Google ScholarWorld Bank. 2013. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2013/11/05/​niger-invests-in-early-childhood-through-social-safety-nets. Google Scholar Previous chapterNext chapter FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetails View Published: June 2015ISBN: 978-1-4648-0543-1e-ISBN: 978-1-4648-0544-8 Copyright & Permissions Related TopicsPoverty ReductionSocial Protections and Labor KeywordsSOCIAL SAFETY NETSSSNSPOVERTY AND POVERTY REDUCTIONMOVING OUT OF PROPERTYSOCIAL PROTECTION POLICYRESILIENCE PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W4246397740 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4246397740 date "2015-06-29" @default.
• W4246397740 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4246397740 title "Results and Evidence about Social Safety Nets" @default.
• W4246397740 cites W1835588239 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W1980290658 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W1992148399 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2023292007 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2047645264 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2087921918 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2095543301 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2106884640 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2107560840 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2125531938 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2138183897 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2142656263 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W2169690428 @default.
• W4246397740 cites W3124012071 @default.
• W4246397740 doi "https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0543-1_section4" @default.
• W4246397740 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W4246397740 type Work @default.
• W4246397740 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4246397740 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W4246397740 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4246397740 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W4246397740 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4246397740 hasConceptScore W4246397740C15744967 @default.
• W4246397740 hasConceptScore W4246397740C38652104 @default.
• W4246397740 hasConceptScore W4246397740C41008148 @default.
• W4246397740 hasLocation W42463977401 @default.
• W4246397740 hasOpenAccess W4246397740 @default.
• W4246397740 hasPrimaryLocation W42463977401 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2130043461 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W3004735627 @default.
• W4246397740 hasRelatedWork W2530322880 @default.
• W4246397740 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4246397740 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4246397740 workType "book-chapter" @default.