Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4246441906> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W4246441906 endingPage "764" @default.
- W4246441906 startingPage "764" @default.
- W4246441906 abstract "Reports an error in What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research by T. D. Stanley, Evan C. Carter and Hristos Doucouliagos (Psychological Bulletin, 2018[Dec], Vol 144[12], 1325-1346). In the article, the Open Science Framework (OSF) URL for the data has now been included in the author note. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-51211-001.) Can recent failures to replicate psychological research be explained by typical magnitudes of statistical power, bias or heterogeneity? A large survey of 12,065 estimated effect sizes from 200 meta-analyses and nearly 8,000 papers is used to assess these key dimensions of replicability. First, our survey finds that psychological research is, on average, afflicted with low statistical power. The median of median power across these 200 areas of research is about 36%, and only about 8% of studies have adequate power (using Cohen's 80% convention). Second, the median proportion of the observed variation among reported effect sizes attributed to heterogeneity is 74% (I2). Heterogeneity of this magnitude makes it unlikely that the typical psychological study can be closely replicated when replication is defined as study-level null hypothesis significance testing. Third, the good news is that we find only a small amount of average residual reporting bias, allaying some of the often-expressed concerns about the reach of publication bias and questionable research practices. Nonetheless, the low power and high heterogeneity that our survey finds fully explain recent difficulties to replicate highly regarded psychological studies and reveal challenges for scientific progress in psychology. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)." @default.
- W4246441906 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4246441906 date "2019-07-01" @default.
- W4246441906 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W4246441906 title "“What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research”: Correction to Stanley, Carter, and Doucouliagos (2018)." @default.
- W4246441906 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000203" @default.
- W4246441906 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31192651" @default.
- W4246441906 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W4246441906 type Work @default.
- W4246441906 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4246441906 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C12590798 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C188255311 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C191988596 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C2781162219 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C2992048920 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C40696583 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C87007009 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConcept C96608239 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C105795698 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C121332964 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C12590798 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C126322002 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C149782125 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C15744967 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C163258240 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C188255311 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C191988596 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C2780439572 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C2781162219 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C2992048920 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C33923547 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C40696583 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C44249647 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C62520636 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C71924100 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C77805123 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C87007009 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C95190672 @default.
- W4246441906 hasConceptScore W4246441906C96608239 @default.
- W4246441906 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W4246441906 hasLocation W42464419061 @default.
- W4246441906 hasLocation W42464419062 @default.
- W4246441906 hasOpenAccess W4246441906 @default.
- W4246441906 hasPrimaryLocation W42464419061 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W1575356730 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W2147234629 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W2419504199 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W2883778230 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W2896198545 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W2897830442 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W2952843659 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W4244569685 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W4246441906 @default.
- W4246441906 hasRelatedWork W4308505488 @default.
- W4246441906 hasVolume "145" @default.
- W4246441906 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4246441906 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4246441906 workType "article" @default.