FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4246568618> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4246568618 endingPage "e98" @default.
• W4246568618 startingPage "e98" @default.
• W4246568618 abstract "SummaryEndoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome leads to comparable results compared to open in situ decompression.Abstract DataAimThe Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after decompression of the ulnar nerve. Are the results of endoscopic treatment comparable to open in situ decompression?Method30 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically proved Cubital Tunnel Syndrome were scheduled for operative treatment. After randomization 15 patients were treated with open in situ decompression, 15 patients were operated using an endoscopic technique. In these cases the ulnar nerve is identified via an approximately 2cm wide incision in the cubital tunnel. The next steps of the procedure are performed endoscopically distally (up to 15cm distal of the cubital tunnel) and proximally (approx. 10cm proximal of the cubital tunnel). A transposition of the nerve was not necessary in the endoscopic group; in the open group one subcutaneous transposition was performed. Patients were followed prospectively after 10 days, 3 and 12 months clinically and electrophysiologically. The results were analysed according to the Dellon classification and the postoperative results according to the modified Bishop classification and patient satisfaction. Comparison between open and endoscopic results was statistically analysed by parametric method, using 2-tailed t test. The level of significance was set up at p<0.05.Results13 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group could be completely evaluated. All patients showed a clinical improvement compared to the preoperative situation. The modified Bishop Score revealed at last follow up in the open group 6 very good, 6 good and 1 satisfying result; in the endoscopic group 8 very good and 6 good results. In the endoscopic group one superficial hematoma was noted that did not require a revision. Functional improvement was quicker in the endoscopic group. 12 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group were satisfied with the postoperative result and would choose surgery again.DiscussionThe endoscopic decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome leads to comparable results to open in situ decompression after 12 months. SummaryEndoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome leads to comparable results compared to open in situ decompression. Endoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome leads to comparable results compared to open in situ decompression. Abstract DataAimThe Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after decompression of the ulnar nerve. Are the results of endoscopic treatment comparable to open in situ decompression?Method30 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically proved Cubital Tunnel Syndrome were scheduled for operative treatment. After randomization 15 patients were treated with open in situ decompression, 15 patients were operated using an endoscopic technique. In these cases the ulnar nerve is identified via an approximately 2cm wide incision in the cubital tunnel. The next steps of the procedure are performed endoscopically distally (up to 15cm distal of the cubital tunnel) and proximally (approx. 10cm proximal of the cubital tunnel). A transposition of the nerve was not necessary in the endoscopic group; in the open group one subcutaneous transposition was performed. Patients were followed prospectively after 10 days, 3 and 12 months clinically and electrophysiologically. The results were analysed according to the Dellon classification and the postoperative results according to the modified Bishop classification and patient satisfaction. Comparison between open and endoscopic results was statistically analysed by parametric method, using 2-tailed t test. The level of significance was set up at p<0.05.Results13 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group could be completely evaluated. All patients showed a clinical improvement compared to the preoperative situation. The modified Bishop Score revealed at last follow up in the open group 6 very good, 6 good and 1 satisfying result; in the endoscopic group 8 very good and 6 good results. In the endoscopic group one superficial hematoma was noted that did not require a revision. Functional improvement was quicker in the endoscopic group. 12 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group were satisfied with the postoperative result and would choose surgery again.DiscussionThe endoscopic decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome leads to comparable results to open in situ decompression after 12 months. AimThe Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after decompression of the ulnar nerve. Are the results of endoscopic treatment comparable to open in situ decompression? The Purpose of this study was to evaluate the results after decompression of the ulnar nerve. Are the results of endoscopic treatment comparable to open in situ decompression? Method30 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically proved Cubital Tunnel Syndrome were scheduled for operative treatment. After randomization 15 patients were treated with open in situ decompression, 15 patients were operated using an endoscopic technique. In these cases the ulnar nerve is identified via an approximately 2cm wide incision in the cubital tunnel. The next steps of the procedure are performed endoscopically distally (up to 15cm distal of the cubital tunnel) and proximally (approx. 10cm proximal of the cubital tunnel). A transposition of the nerve was not necessary in the endoscopic group; in the open group one subcutaneous transposition was performed. Patients were followed prospectively after 10 days, 3 and 12 months clinically and electrophysiologically. The results were analysed according to the Dellon classification and the postoperative results according to the modified Bishop classification and patient satisfaction. Comparison between open and endoscopic results was statistically analysed by parametric method, using 2-tailed t test. The level of significance was set up at p<0.05. 30 patients with clinically and electrophysiologically proved Cubital Tunnel Syndrome were scheduled for operative treatment. After randomization 15 patients were treated with open in situ decompression, 15 patients were operated using an endoscopic technique. In these cases the ulnar nerve is identified via an approximately 2cm wide incision in the cubital tunnel. The next steps of the procedure are performed endoscopically distally (up to 15cm distal of the cubital tunnel) and proximally (approx. 10cm proximal of the cubital tunnel). A transposition of the nerve was not necessary in the endoscopic group; in the open group one subcutaneous transposition was performed. Patients were followed prospectively after 10 days, 3 and 12 months clinically and electrophysiologically. The results were analysed according to the Dellon classification and the postoperative results according to the modified Bishop classification and patient satisfaction. Comparison between open and endoscopic results was statistically analysed by parametric method, using 2-tailed t test. The level of significance was set up at p<0.05. Results13 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group could be completely evaluated. All patients showed a clinical improvement compared to the preoperative situation. The modified Bishop Score revealed at last follow up in the open group 6 very good, 6 good and 1 satisfying result; in the endoscopic group 8 very good and 6 good results. In the endoscopic group one superficial hematoma was noted that did not require a revision. Functional improvement was quicker in the endoscopic group. 12 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group were satisfied with the postoperative result and would choose surgery again. 13 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group could be completely evaluated. All patients showed a clinical improvement compared to the preoperative situation. The modified Bishop Score revealed at last follow up in the open group 6 very good, 6 good and 1 satisfying result; in the endoscopic group 8 very good and 6 good results. In the endoscopic group one superficial hematoma was noted that did not require a revision. Functional improvement was quicker in the endoscopic group. 12 patients in the open group and 14 patients in the endoscopic group were satisfied with the postoperative result and would choose surgery again. DiscussionThe endoscopic decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome leads to comparable results to open in situ decompression after 12 months. The endoscopic decompression of cubital tunnel syndrome leads to comparable results to open in situ decompression after 12 months." @default.
• W4246568618 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4246568618 creator A5066838108 @default.
• W4246568618 creator A5088226228 @default.
• W4246568618 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W4246568618 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4246568618 title "Ulnar Nerve Decompression in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome – Open In Situ Decompression Versus Endoscopic Decompression" @default.
• W4246568618 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.110" @default.
• W4246568618 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W4246568618 type Work @default.
• W4246568618 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4246568618 countsByYear W42465686182020 @default.
• W4246568618 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4246568618 hasAuthorship W4246568618A5066838108 @default.
• W4246568618 hasAuthorship W4246568618A5088226228 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C2778931672 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C2780829609 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C2991924879 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C3019419658 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C141071460 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C2778931672 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C2779480328 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C2780829609 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C2781184374 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C2991924879 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C3019419658 @default.
• W4246568618 hasConceptScore W4246568618C71924100 @default.
• W4246568618 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W4246568618 hasLocation W42465686181 @default.
• W4246568618 hasOpenAccess W4246568618 @default.
• W4246568618 hasPrimaryLocation W42465686181 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W1966923210 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2089721460 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2119695158 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2144324385 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2179546397 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2348793984 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2417097217 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2608545719 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2789912108 @default.
• W4246568618 hasRelatedWork W2884407925 @default.
• W4246568618 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W4246568618 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4246568618 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4246568618 workType "article" @default.