FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4247274951> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4247274951 abstract "The attention given to indigenous rights has increased since the approval of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) in 2007. Although it is a soft law declaration and technically not binding, it serves as the cornerstone of much of the contemporary research on indigenous rights. Four states that initially voted in opposition to the UNDRIP—Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States—have now endorsed it. Despite the attention it garners, the UNDRIP is not the only international instrument that has been utilized to establish and protect indigenous rights and interests. The regional inter-American human rights system has also been key in the development and protection of indigenous rights. Another important facet of the UNDRIP is that it took twenty-two years of drafting effort before it was approved by the United Nations General Assembly. During those twenty-two years, many discussions, debates, and analyses were undertaken over the meaning of rights and principles included in the drafts of the declaration. Research and scholarship from the era before passage of the declaration is helpful in understanding the content of the document. But the approval of the declaration did not end the controversies over indigenous rights. Debate and examination of the evolving body of indigenous rights continues during the period after passage of the declaration. As well, indigenous rights are not simply “human rights”; rather, they are a complex set of rights that can impact a broad swath of other legal doctrines. Intersections of indigenous rights with laws regarding economic development, the environment, and land claims can give rise to new interpretations and understandings of the impact of indigenous rights. While the four “no states” might be what most readily comes to mind when thinking about where many indigenous peoples live, indigenous peoples are, in fact, scattered throughout the world, including Europe. Research on indigenous rights is not carried out only from a legal perspective. Indigenous rights cover many different kinds of rights. Some have an emphasis in international law doctrines, such as the right to self-determination and issues about indigenous and tribal sovereignty. Other rights emphasize the importance of culture and heritage, and it can be useful to consider research in other disciplines, including history, political science, and anthropology. This article includes research and resources in related disciplines as well as legal research and law-based resources. (A note about language: American references to indigenous peoples are inclusive of the words “American Indian” or “Indian.” “Indian” is a legal term of art used in federal and state statutes. Indigenous peoples in the United States refer to themselves as “Indians” rather than Native Americans. For these reasons, where appropriate, the article makes use of the terms American Indian and Indian in preference to Native American. This usage may be confusing to non-American readers and so a clarification is offered)." @default.
• W4247274951 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4247274951 creator A5053022237 @default.
• W4247274951 date "2019-02-27" @default.
• W4247274951 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4247274951 title "Indigenous Rights" @default.
• W4247274951 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0255" @default.
• W4247274951 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W4247274951 type Work @default.
• W4247274951 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4247274951 crossrefType "reference-entry" @default.
• W4247274951 hasAuthorship W4247274951A5053022237 @default.
• W4247274951 hasBestOaLocation W42472749512 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C138147947 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C22299250 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C2776001114 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C36566018 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C543595228 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C55958113 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C86615163 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConcept C95691615 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C138147947 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C169437150 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C17744445 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C18903297 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C199539241 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C22299250 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C2776001114 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C36566018 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C543595228 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C55958113 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C86615163 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C86803240 @default.
• W4247274951 hasConceptScore W4247274951C95691615 @default.
• W4247274951 hasLocation W42472749511 @default.
• W4247274951 hasLocation W42472749512 @default.
• W4247274951 hasOpenAccess W4247274951 @default.
• W4247274951 hasPrimaryLocation W42472749511 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W146849823 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W1537525480 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W1690248212 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W2019263168 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W2240285087 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W2275513059 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W2753533019 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W2809986798 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W2946772709 @default.
• W4247274951 hasRelatedWork W645709069 @default.
• W4247274951 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4247274951 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4247274951 workType "reference-entry" @default.