FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4247309561> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4247309561 endingPage "142" @default.
• W4247309561 startingPage "111" @default.
• W4247309561 abstract "No AccessSep 2020ServicesAuthors/Editors: Batshur Gootiiz, Giulia Jonetzko, Joscelyn Magdeleine, Juan Marchetti, Aaditya MattooBatshur GootiizSearch for more papers by this author, Giulia JonetzkoSearch for more papers by this author, Joscelyn MagdeleineSearch for more papers by this author, Juan MarchettiSearch for more papers by this author, Aaditya MattooSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1539-3_ch4AboutView ChaptersFull TextPDF (0.7 MB) ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Abstract: Presents a new comprehensive database on the design and depth of 144 preferential trade agreements (PTAs) covering trade in services signed by 105 World Trade Organization (WTO) members (considering EU as one member) by (1) reviewing previous attempts at coding different aspects of services PTAs; (2) describing the new dataset and explaining the main coding assumptions; and (3) providing a first overview of results and trends in the design of PTAs arising from the database. Commitments under PTAs seldom go beyond countries’ applied policies and, therefore, the explicit liberalization resulting from the agreements usually remains limited to a few members and a few areas. The PTAs do enhance transparency and policy certainty because parties’ services commitments cover more trading partners and more sectors, and in some cases prove closer to applied policies than their commitments under General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).The new rules that the agreements create could enhance access to service markets. ReferencesBaccini, Leonardo, Andreas Dür, Manfred Elsig, and Karolina Milewicz. 2011 The design of preferential trade agreements: A new dataset in the making. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-10, World Trade Organization, Geneva. Google ScholarBorchert, Ingo, Batshur Gootiiz, and Aaditya Mattoo. 2011 Services in Doha: What’s on the table? In Unfinished Business? The WTO’s Doha Agenda, edited by Martin, Will and Aaditya Mattoo. London: Center for Economic and Policy Research and World Bank. Google ScholarBorchert, Ingo, Batshur Gootiiz, and Aaditya Mattoo. 2014 Policy barriers to international trade in services: Evidence from a new database. World Bank Economic Review 28(1):162-88. LinkGoogle ScholarDeardorff, Alan V and Robert M Stern. 2008 Empirical analysis of barriers to international services transactions and the consequences of liberalization. In A Handbook of International Trade in Services, edited by Mattoo, Aaditya, Robert M Stern, and Gianni Zanini. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarDür, Andreas, Leonardo Baccini, and Manfred Elsig. 2014 The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new database. Review of International Organizations 9(3): 353-75. CrossrefGoogle ScholarFink, Carsten and Martin Molinuevo. 2008a East Asian preferential trade agreements in services: Liberalization content and WTO rules. World Trade Review 7(4):641-73. CrossrefGoogle ScholarFink, Carsten and Martin Molinuevo. 2008b East Asian free trade agreements in services: Key architectural elements. Journal of International Economic Law 11:2 (June). CrossrefGoogle ScholarGeloso Grosso, M, et al. 2015 Services trade restrictiveness index (STRI): Scoring and weighting methodology. OECD Trade Policy Paper 177, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5js7n8wbtk9r-en. Google ScholarGootiiz, Batshur and Aaditya Mattoo. 2017 Services in the Trans-Pacific Partnership: What would be lost? Journal of World Trade 51(5):763-85. Google ScholarGootiiz, Batshur and Aaditya Mattoo. 2017 Regionalism in services: A study of ASEAN. World Economy 40(3): 574-97. doi:10.1111/twec.12328. CrossrefGoogle ScholarHoekman, Bernard. 1996 Assessing the General Agreement on Trade in Services. In The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, edited by Martin, Will and L Alan Winters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarHufbauer, Gary Clyde. 2016 Liberalization of services trade. Chapter 7 of Assessing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Volume 1: Market Access and Sectoral Issues. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Google ScholarHoude, Marie-France, Akshay Kolse-Patil, and Sébastien Miroudot. 2007 The interaction between investment and services chapters in selected regional trade agreements. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper 55, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Google ScholarLatrille, P and J Lee. 2012 Services rules in regional trade agreements: How diverse and how creative as compared to the GATS multilateral rules? WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2012-19, World Trade Organization, Geneva. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMarchetti, JA and M Roy. 2009 Services liberalization in the WTO and in PTAs. In Opening markets for trade in services: Countries and sectors in bilateral and WTO negotiations, edited by Marchetti, Juan A and Martin Roy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMarchetti, Juan and Martin Roy. 2013 The TISA initiative: An overview of market access issues. Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013-11, World Trade Organization, Economic Research and Statistics Division, Geneva. Google ScholarMattoo, Aaditya and Carsten Fink. 2004 Regional agreements and trade in services: Policy issues. Journal of Economic Integration 19:742-79. CrossrefGoogle ScholarMattoo, Aaditya and Pierre Sauvé. 2011 The preferential liberalization of services trade. In Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development – A Handbook, edited by Chauffour, Jean-Pierre and Jean-Christophe Maur. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google ScholarMiroudot, S, J Sauvage, and M Sudreau. 2010 Multilateralising regionalism: how preferential are services commitments in regional trade agreements? OECD Trade Policy Paper 106. Google ScholarOECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2009 Methodology for deriving the STRI. Paper presented at the OECD Experts Meeting on the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index (STRI), Paris, July 2–3. Google ScholarRoy, Martin, Juan Marchetti, and Hoe Lim. 2007 Services liberalization in the new generation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs): How much further than the GATS? World Trade Review 6(2):155-92. CrossrefGoogle ScholarRoy, Martin. 2011 Services commitments in preferential trade agreements: an expanded dataset. WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2011-18, World Trade Organization, Geneva. CrossrefGoogle ScholarUS International Trade Commission. 2016 Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely impact on the US economy and on specific industry sectors. Publication 4607, https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4607.pdf. Google Scholar Previous chapterNext chapter FiguresreferencesRecommendeddetailsCited byDeep Services Trade Agreements and Their Effect on Trade and Value Added4 May 2021 View Published: September 2020ISBN: 978-1-4648-1539-3e-ISBN: 978-1-4648-1554-6 Copyright & Permissions Related TopicsInternational Economics & Trade KeywordsPREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENTSWORLD TRADE ORGANIZATIONWTOTRADE LIBERALIZATIONTRADE POLICYTRANSPARENCYGENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADEGATTTRADABLE GOODS AND SERVICESTRADE REFORMTRADE LAWTRADE REGULATIONTRADE PREFERENCES PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W4247309561 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4247309561 creator A5013826138 @default.
• W4247309561 creator A5019673794 @default.
• W4247309561 creator A5036346928 @default.
• W4247309561 creator A5057864522 @default.
• W4247309561 creator A5082301357 @default.
• W4247309561 date "2020-09-23" @default.
• W4247309561 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4247309561 title "Services" @default.
• W4247309561 cites W185294626 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W1997430735 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W2132510018 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W2141171974 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W2163297499 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W2168266488 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W2175116910 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W3089654346 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W3123764135 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W3124831398 @default.
• W4247309561 cites W4237932920 @default.
• W4247309561 doi "https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1539-3_ch4" @default.
• W4247309561 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4247309561 type Work @default.
• W4247309561 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W4247309561 countsByYear W42473095612021 @default.
• W4247309561 countsByYear W42473095612022 @default.
• W4247309561 countsByYear W42473095612023 @default.
• W4247309561 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W4247309561 hasAuthorship W4247309561A5013826138 @default.
• W4247309561 hasAuthorship W4247309561A5019673794 @default.
• W4247309561 hasAuthorship W4247309561A5036346928 @default.
• W4247309561 hasAuthorship W4247309561A5057864522 @default.
• W4247309561 hasAuthorship W4247309561A5082301357 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C140413371 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C18547055 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C2776444413 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C2777129469 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C2779554522 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C35532855 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C58823610 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConcept C7493553 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C111472728 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C138885662 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C140413371 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C144133560 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C155202549 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C162324750 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C17744445 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C18547055 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C199539241 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C2776444413 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C2777129469 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C2779554522 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C2780233690 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C35532855 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C58823610 @default.
• W4247309561 hasConceptScore W4247309561C7493553 @default.
• W4247309561 hasLocation W42473095611 @default.
• W4247309561 hasOpenAccess W4247309561 @default.
• W4247309561 hasPrimaryLocation W42473095611 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W1485668395 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W1496956466 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W1563303543 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W2104884193 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W2514592992 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W2749941575 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W2940820653 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W3121635581 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W3126104180 @default.
• W4247309561 hasRelatedWork W3199228368 @default.
• W4247309561 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4247309561 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4247309561 workType "book-chapter" @default.