FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4247808650> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4247808650 abstract "Improved Pressure Response Representation And Reduction Of Numerical Dispersion Effects In Reservoir Simulation Marcelo Laprea-Bigott; Marcelo Laprea-Bigott Universidad de Oriente Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Richard A. Morse Richard A. Morse Texas A and M University Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, September 1980. Paper Number: SPE-8875-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/8875-MS Published: September 21 1980 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Laprea-Bigott, Marcelo, and Richard A. Morse. Improved Pressure Response Representation And Reduction Of Numerical Dispersion Effects In Reservoir Simulation. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, September 1980. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/8875-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractA study has been made of the effects of numerical dispersion in reservoir simulation. A one-dimensional two-phase (water-oil) numerical model has been used in this investigation.Instead of the regular single-point upstream transmissibilities, a new technique is proposed which consists of keeping track of the position of the displacement front, and using an interblock pseudo transmissibility. It is shown that a very significant reduction of the numerical dispersion of flood fronts and much improved representation of pressure history are obtained when using these modifications.The applicability and effectiveness of this technique is illustrated by comparisons of numerical examples with theoretical and data published in the literature. The method proposed in this study can be implemented in any finite-difference reservoir simulator without much reprogramming effort, provided the displacement process to be simulated can be described by the Buckley-Leverett theory.IntroductionThe flow of fluids in porous media is described by non-linear partial differential equations which have analytical solutions only for a limited number cases. Since each reservoir is a unique system, general reservoir simulators have been developed which use finite difference methods in solving these equations.In these numerical simulators, the reservoir is divided into a number of discrete blocks (cells) and a system of mathematical equations is used to calculate pressures and saturations at the grid block faces. pressures and saturations at the grid block faces. Several different schemes have been proposed in order to evaluate the fluid mobilities; these are: single-point upstream, downstream, mid-point weighting, and two-point upstream. Of these, the usual procedure adopted is to evaluate these terms by using the procedure adopted is to evaluate these terms by using the single-point scheme, either because of the oscillation and instabilities that some of them have, or because of the programming efforts involved.The use of the single-point upstream mobility has been proved to cause excessive numerical dispersion of flood fronts for some problems. Also, when simulating unfavorable mobility ratio displacements, the pressure profile will present a physically unrealistic pressure profile will present a physically unrealistic stepwise behavior when the displacing phase enters a new cell. Thus, the calculated pressure drops and the saturation profiles will be in error if upstream mobilities are used.Todd, et al., presented an alternative to the single-point scheme by introducing a two-point upstream weighting scheme. They demonstrated that an improvement in accuracy is obtained when using this method om implicit pressure-explicit saturation type models.A modified version of the two-point upstream weighting scheme has been introduced by Wheatley which allows its implementation in fully implicit or IMPES simulators. The results were compared with an analytical solution and it was shown that the differences between the analytical and the numerical results is reduced when using this technique. However, no results have been reported at adverse mobility ratios when using the two-point upstream weithting scheme.Other methods have been proposed to alleviate the numerical dispersion problem. These nine-point finite difference schemes are in disadvantage with respect to the regular five point finite difference approximation because of the extra computer time that is required to solve the resultant system of equations.Leventhal describes the use of the fourth order operator compact implicit (OCI) method in the simulation of an immiscible water flood. The results were compared with the analytical solution of Buckley and Leverett, conventional finite difference methods using the single-point upstream method and also with variational methods. Keywords: Modeling & Simulation, Upstream Oil & Gas, displacement, front tracking, reservoir simulation, Saturation profile, simulator, pressure profile, numerical model, flow in porous media Subjects: Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Reservoir Simulation, Flow in porous media This content is only available via PDF. 1980. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download." @default.
• W4247808650 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4247808650 creator A5022997423 @default.
• W4247808650 creator A5084193892 @default.
• W4247808650 date "1980-09-01" @default.
• W4247808650 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4247808650 title "IMPROVED PRESSURE RESPONSE REPRESENTATION AND REDUCTION OF NUMERICAL DISPERSION EFFECTS IN RESERVOIR SIMULATION " @default.
• W4247808650 doi "https://doi.org/10.2523/8875-ms" @default.
• W4247808650 hasPublicationYear "1980" @default.
• W4247808650 type Work @default.
• W4247808650 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4247808650 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4247808650 hasAuthorship W4247808650A5022997423 @default.
• W4247808650 hasAuthorship W4247808650A5084193892 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C140031139 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C177562468 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C2776359362 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C37531588 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C44154836 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C500300565 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C111335779 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C120665830 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C121332964 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C127413603 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C140031139 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C161191863 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C166957645 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C17744445 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C177562468 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C199539241 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C23123220 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C2524010 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C2776359362 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C2778805511 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C33923547 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C37531588 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C41008148 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C42475967 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C44154836 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C500300565 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C76155785 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C94625758 @default.
• W4247808650 hasConceptScore W4247808650C95457728 @default.
• W4247808650 hasLocation W42478086501 @default.
• W4247808650 hasOpenAccess W4247808650 @default.
• W4247808650 hasPrimaryLocation W42478086501 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2013988695 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2086064646 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2115485936 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2119135658 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2165149828 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2357241418 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2476842895 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2553294900 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2795598076 @default.
• W4247808650 hasRelatedWork W2529230142 @default.
• W4247808650 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4247808650 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4247808650 workType "article" @default.