FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4247910558> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4247910558 abstract "Background Surgical wounds that become infected are often debrided because clinicians believe that removal of this necrotic or infected tissue will expedite wound healing. There are numerous methods available but no consensus on which one is most effective for surgical wounds. Objectives To determine the effect of different methods of debridement on the rate of debridement and healing of surgical wounds. Search methods For this second update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 13 April 2011); the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE (2007 to March Week 5 2011); Ovid MEDLINE (In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations, April 11, 2011); Ovid EMBASE (2007 to 2011 Week 14); and EBSCO CINAHL (2007 to 8 April 2011). Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with outcomes including at least one of the following: time to complete debridement or time to complete healing. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently reviewed the abstracts and titles obtained from the search, extracted data independently using a standardised extraction sheet and independently assessed methodological quality. One review author was involved in all stages of the data collection and extraction process, thus ensuring continuity. Main results Five RCTs (159 participants) were eligible for inclusion; all compared treatments for infected surgical wounds and reported time required to achieve a clean wound bed (complete debridement). One trial compared an enzymatic agent (streptokinase/streptodornase) with saline‐soaked dressings. Four trials compared the effectiveness of dextranomer beads or paste with other products (different comparator in each trial) to achieve complete debridement. Meta‐analysis was not possible due to the unique comparisons within each trial. One trial reported that dextranomer achieved a clean wound bed significantly more quickly than Eusol, and one trial comparing enzymatic debridement with saline‐soaked dressings reported that the enzyme‐treated wounds were cleaned more quickly. However, methodological quality was poor in these two trials. Authors' conclusions There is a lack of large, high‐quality published RCTs evaluating debridement per se, or comparing different methods of debridement for surgical wounds, to guide clinical decision‐making." @default.
• W4247910558 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4247910558 creator A5026024616 @default.
• W4247910558 creator A5040375476 @default.
• W4247910558 creator A5064130339 @default.
• W4247910558 creator A5072271525 @default.
• W4247910558 date "2011-05-11" @default.
• W4247910558 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W4247910558 title "Debridement for surgical wounds" @default.
• W4247910558 cites W135133421 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W1825709425 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W1969891059 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W1973902741 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W1983071554 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W1993430983 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W1998287383 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2004177455 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2005727694 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2009979015 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2014789226 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2016111680 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2023086110 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2025033210 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2052006474 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2054899598 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2068655672 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2071452846 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2073686886 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2087801341 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2111620323 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2111714100 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2113944661 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2120033284 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2120327693 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2132131493 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2132667520 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2143222764 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2148762394 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2153733906 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2167330052 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2345353906 @default.
• W4247910558 cites W2411990327 @default.
• W4247910558 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006214.pub3" @default.
• W4247910558 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W4247910558 type Work @default.
• W4247910558 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W4247910558 countsByYear W42479105582012 @default.
• W4247910558 countsByYear W42479105582013 @default.
• W4247910558 countsByYear W42479105582014 @default.
• W4247910558 countsByYear W42479105582018 @default.
• W4247910558 countsByYear W42479105582019 @default.
• W4247910558 countsByYear W42479105582020 @default.
• W4247910558 countsByYear W42479105582021 @default.
• W4247910558 crossrefType "reference-entry" @default.
• W4247910558 hasAuthorship W4247910558A5026024616 @default.
• W4247910558 hasAuthorship W4247910558A5040375476 @default.
• W4247910558 hasAuthorship W4247910558A5064130339 @default.
• W4247910558 hasAuthorship W4247910558A5072271525 @default.
• W4247910558 hasBestOaLocation W42479105582 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C2777438270 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C2777466982 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C118552586 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C126322002 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C141071460 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C168563851 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C17744445 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C199539241 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C27415008 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C2776478404 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C2777438270 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C2777466982 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C2779473830 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C2781145037 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C71924100 @default.
• W4247910558 hasConceptScore W4247910558C95190672 @default.
• W4247910558 hasLocation W42479105581 @default.
• W4247910558 hasLocation W42479105582 @default.
• W4247910558 hasOpenAccess W4247910558 @default.
• W4247910558 hasPrimaryLocation W42479105581 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W1967911880 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W2164714129 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W2377958650 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W2767101331 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W2913164441 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W3013041320 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W3018781222 @default.
• W4247910558 hasRelatedWork W3030566976 @default.

• next