FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4248360019> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4248360019 endingPage "198" @default.
• W4248360019 startingPage "191" @default.
• W4248360019 abstract "To assess the effectiveness of the potential advantages with 3-dimensional-based treatment planning versus 2-dimensional pelvic bone-based treatment planning in patients with rectal cancer, controlled for clinical stage.Areas at risk from computed tomography in 30 patients were delineated: mesorectum, presacral, internal iliac, obturator and external iliac nodes. Two planning target volumes per patient were created: PTV_T3 (M + PSN + ON + IIN) and PTV_T4 (M + PSN + ON + IIN + EIN). Two- and 3-dimensional treatment plans for each planning target volume were calculated. Three analyses were performed: 1) mean volume receiving doses >95% and >105%; according to the percentage of prescribed dose to cover at least 95% of the planning target volume, the treatment plan was defined as optimal dose >95%, acceptable dose between 95% and 90%, inferior dose <90%; 2) comparison of the percentage of volume covered by the dose for 2- vs 3-dimensional; 3) determination of the doses at which the lack of volume coverage started to decrease significantly.For PTV_T3, the following was seen: 1) 2D vs 3D comparison showed optimal PTV_T3 coverage in 76.7% and 96.7%, respectively; 2) 2D vs 3D TP coverage difference was significant between 29%-95% of the total dose; 3) the lack of volume coverage started at 30% for 2D and 89% for 3D. For PTV_T4, the following was seen: 1) 2D vs 3D comparison showed an optimal PTV_T4 coverage in 33.3% and 86.7%, respectively; 2) 2D vs 3D TP coverage difference was significant between 7%-97% of the total dose; 3) the lack of volume coverage started at 7% for 2D and 87% for 3D.The 3D treatment planning was superior to 2D treatment planning in covering areas at risk for pelvic recurrence in patients treated for rectal cancer. The areas with suboptimal coverage may lead to an increased risk of recurrence and should be correlated with the patterns of recurrence." @default.
• W4248360019 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5000176548 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5008208200 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5013039096 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5018139001 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5058764837 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5076092540 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5081904661 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5087201995 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5088794618 @default.
• W4248360019 creator A5089868479 @default.
• W4248360019 date "2013-03-01" @default.
• W4248360019 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4248360019 title "Is Two-Dimensional Field Definition Sufficient for Pelvic Node Coverage in Rectal Cancer Compared to Technical Three-Dimensional Definition?" @default.
• W4248360019 cites W1963639848 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W1969874022 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W1972637879 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W1974720222 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W1994813127 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2000687665 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2009469758 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2017132889 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2022680314 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2029497219 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2037145385 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2045804591 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2065526182 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2078482720 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2095439981 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2113353705 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2114585202 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2116576422 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2122942119 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2124107794 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2124886112 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2142818315 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2154005327 @default.
• W4248360019 cites W2159691094 @default.
• W4248360019 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/030089161309900212" @default.
• W4248360019 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23748813" @default.
• W4248360019 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W4248360019 type Work @default.
• W4248360019 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4248360019 countsByYear W42483600192017 @default.
• W4248360019 countsByYear W42483600192022 @default.
• W4248360019 countsByYear W42483600192023 @default.
• W4248360019 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5000176548 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5008208200 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5013039096 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5018139001 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5058764837 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5076092540 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5081904661 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5087201995 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5088794618 @default.
• W4248360019 hasAuthorship W4248360019A5089868479 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C2777201421 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C2910692049 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C121608353 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C126322002 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C126838900 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C126894567 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C146357865 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C151730666 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C201645570 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C2777201421 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C2910692049 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C2989005 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C3018023364 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C509974204 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C526805850 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C71924100 @default.
• W4248360019 hasConceptScore W4248360019C86803240 @default.
• W4248360019 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4248360019 hasLocation W42483600191 @default.
• W4248360019 hasLocation W42483600192 @default.
• W4248360019 hasOpenAccess W4248360019 @default.
• W4248360019 hasPrimaryLocation W42483600191 @default.
• W4248360019 hasRelatedWork W2056863020 @default.
• W4248360019 hasRelatedWork W2097560577 @default.
• W4248360019 hasRelatedWork W2348914812 @default.
• W4248360019 hasRelatedWork W2360329604 @default.
• W4248360019 hasRelatedWork W2387303445 @default.

• next