FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4248615440> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4248615440 endingPage "1010e" @default.
• W4248615440 startingPage "1010e" @default.
• W4248615440 abstract "Sir: We completely agree that targeted muscle reinnervation technique revolutionized neuroma treatment, especially in high-level upper limb amputees. However, improvement is not limited to this patient cohort. In the prospective, randomized, controlled trial by Dumanian et al., the treatment of neuroma pain was successfully demonstrated in upper and lower limb amputees.1 As concluded in the study by Salminger et al., targeted muscle reinnervation represents a worthwhile procedure, even if the newly established neuromuscular interfaces are not used for prosthetic control.2 In general, most of the known surgical concepts for neuroma treatment ignore the certitude that a nerve after neuroma resection will attempt to regenerate and subsequently form a new neuroma. Therefore, treatment success of these numerous methods requires that the newly created neuroma be less symptomatic in its new environment (e.g., bone, fat, vein). However, in targeted muscle reinnervation surgery, mixed motor and sensory nerves are transferred to a muscle branch of a nearby muscle and therefore connect with motor end-plates or sensory end organs such as proprioceptors within the muscle.1 Thus, no new neuroma is formed and pain levels will decrease significantly. In the case reported by Loewenstein and Adkinson in their letter, the sensory digital nerves after ray amputation are transferred onto the motor branches of the interosseus nerves nearby. We congratulate the authors for the excellent results and the surgical approach; however, the concept of targeted muscle reinnervation for treatment of neuroma following digit amputations was recently published by Daugherty et al.3 In addition, the feasibility of reinnervating a denervated muscle with a sensory nerve, known as “sensory protection,” has been shown by Hynes et al.4 Targeted muscle reinnervation for the treatment of digital nerve neuromas is a promising adaptation of the classic targeted muscle reinnervation concept. Although it is not the goal to actually reinnervate the muscle and generate myoelectric signals, it provides the sensory nerve with a target, leading to successful nerve regeneration without neuroma formation. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication." @default.
• W4248615440 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4248615440 creator A5000712777 @default.
• W4248615440 creator A5075560591 @default.
• W4248615440 creator A5086227156 @default.
• W4248615440 creator A5091659813 @default.
• W4248615440 date "2020-05-01" @default.
• W4248615440 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4248615440 title "Reply: Outcomes, Challenges, and Pitfalls after Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in High-Level Amputees: Is It Worth the Effort?" @default.
• W4248615440 cites W2005446383 @default.
• W4248615440 cites W2898319359 @default.
• W4248615440 cites W2968446346 @default.
• W4248615440 cites W2971034458 @default.
• W4248615440 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006757" @default.
• W4248615440 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4248615440 type Work @default.
• W4248615440 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4248615440 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4248615440 hasAuthorship W4248615440A5000712777 @default.
• W4248615440 hasAuthorship W4248615440A5075560591 @default.
• W4248615440 hasAuthorship W4248615440A5086227156 @default.
• W4248615440 hasAuthorship W4248615440A5091659813 @default.
• W4248615440 hasBestOaLocation W42486154401 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C2776204877 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C2778934081 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C2779649809 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C94487597 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C141071460 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C15744967 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C169760540 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C2776204877 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C2778934081 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C2779649809 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C71924100 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C94487597 @default.
• W4248615440 hasConceptScore W4248615440C99508421 @default.
• W4248615440 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4248615440 hasLocation W42486154401 @default.
• W4248615440 hasLocation W42486154402 @default.
• W4248615440 hasOpenAccess W4248615440 @default.
• W4248615440 hasPrimaryLocation W42486154401 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W2152082700 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W3006235475 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W3087163845 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W3153231536 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W3201330488 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W3204606794 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W4226436340 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W4300689376 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W4313440598 @default.
• W4248615440 hasRelatedWork W4365511106 @default.
• W4248615440 hasVolume "145" @default.
• W4248615440 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4248615440 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4248615440 workType "article" @default.