Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4249764822> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 64 of
64
with 100 items per page.
- W4249764822 endingPage "1215" @default.
- W4249764822 startingPage "1214" @default.
- W4249764822 abstract "The stone-free outcomes achieved with shock wave lithotripsy are dependent upon the imaging modality chosen. In this report by Sighinolfi et al, the primary follow-up imaging modality was ultrasound supplemented with radiographic studies by undefined criteria. Stone-free rates will be best with ultrasound and worst with CT. 1 Macejko A. Okotie O.T. Zhao L.C. et al. Computed tomography-determined stone-free rates for ureteroscopy of upper tract stones. J Endourol. 2009; 23: 379-382 Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar Understanding this limitation, the author's results are, I believe, representative of what can be expected with current lithotripters. The stones treated in this series were small and, based on historical data reported with the HM3 device, it seems clear that current lithotripters are less efficient and less effective. We should be thankful that the first lithotripter introduced was the HM3. Dornier Lithotripter S 220 F EMSE: The First Report of Over 1000 TreatmentsUrologyVol. 74Issue 6PreviewTo assess the short-term efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with the standard Dornier Lithotripter S 220 F EMSE in the treatment of a large population of 736 patients with renal and ureteral stones. This is the only report with more than 1000 treatments performed with this device. Full-Text PDF ReplyUrologyVol. 74Issue 6PreviewWe perfectly agree with editorial comment that stone-free outcomes after shock wave lithotripsy are better achieved by ultrasound, but, in our opinion, the radiographic modality is incomparably better in following radiopaque ureteral stones expulsion and fragmentation (except for intramural portion of the ureter). Reference 1 in the editorial comment valuates stone-free rates after ureteroscopy using CT; results were compared with studies that used KUB, IVP, and/or ultrasound in the follow-up. Their conclusions were that stone-free rate is better with KUB or IVP and worse with CT; they do not mention ultrasounds as a primary follow-up modality. Full-Text PDF" @default.
- W4249764822 created "2022-05-12" @default.
- W4249764822 creator A5014551797 @default.
- W4249764822 date "2009-12-01" @default.
- W4249764822 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4249764822 title "Editorial Comment" @default.
- W4249764822 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.079" @default.
- W4249764822 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19962514" @default.
- W4249764822 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W4249764822 type Work @default.
- W4249764822 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4249764822 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4249764822 hasAuthorship W4249764822A5014551797 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C2776664737 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C2777756408 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C2777950166 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C2779403450 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C2780226545 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C2780653459 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C3018013779 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C3019088015 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C107457646 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C126838900 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C141071460 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C143753070 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C2776664737 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C2777756408 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C2777950166 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C2779403450 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C2780226545 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C2780653459 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C3018013779 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C3019088015 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C36454342 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C41008148 @default.
- W4249764822 hasConceptScore W4249764822C71924100 @default.
- W4249764822 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W4249764822 hasLocation W42497648221 @default.
- W4249764822 hasLocation W42497648222 @default.
- W4249764822 hasOpenAccess W4249764822 @default.
- W4249764822 hasPrimaryLocation W42497648221 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W1991359181 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W2006344529 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W2129501383 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W2185447029 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W2416109527 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W2905470517 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W4230769751 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W4249764822 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W128137841 @default.
- W4249764822 hasRelatedWork W2108081204 @default.
- W4249764822 hasVolume "74" @default.
- W4249764822 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4249764822 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4249764822 workType "editorial" @default.