FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4250030116> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4250030116 abstract "Abstract Background: It remains no clear conclusion about which is better between robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the short-term and long-term efficacy between RATS and VATS for NSCLC. Methods: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Medline and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before December 2020. The quality of the articles was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Fixed or random effect models were applied according to heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis was conducted. A funnel plot of the overall complication was used to assess the potential publication bias. Results: A total of 18 studies including 11247 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 5114 patients were in the RATS group and 6133 in the VATS group. Compared with VATS, RATS was associated with less blood loss (WMD = -50.40, 95% CI -90.32~-10.48, P = 0.010), lower conversion rate (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.43~0.60, P < 0.001), more harvested lymph nodes (WMD = 1.72, 95% CI 0.63~2.81, P = 0.002) and stations (WMD = 0.51, 95% CI 0.15~0.86, P = 0.005), shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (WMD = -0.61, 95% CI -0.78~-0.44, P < 0.001) and hospital stay (WMD = -1.12, 95% CI -1.58~-0.66, P < 0.001), lower overall complication rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.83~0.99, P = 0.020), and lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36~0.72, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between RATS and VATS in operative time, mortality, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Sensitivity analysis showed that no significant differences were found between the two techniques in conversion rate, number of harvested lymph nodes and stations, and overall complication. Conclusions: The results revealed that RATS is a feasible and safe technique compared with VATS in terms of short and long term outcomes. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of the robotic surgery for NSCLC." @default.
• W4250030116 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4250030116 creator A5020616742 @default.
• W4250030116 creator A5039616532 @default.
• W4250030116 creator A5044785404 @default.
• W4250030116 creator A5056673838 @default.
• W4250030116 creator A5071440758 @default.
• W4250030116 creator A5086120093 @default.
• W4250030116 date "2021-02-01" @default.
• W4250030116 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4250030116 title "Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Lobectomy or Segmentectomy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W4250030116 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-146301/v1" @default.
• W4250030116 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4250030116 type Work @default.
• W4250030116 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4250030116 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4250030116 hasAuthorship W4250030116A5020616742 @default.
• W4250030116 hasAuthorship W4250030116A5039616532 @default.
• W4250030116 hasAuthorship W4250030116A5044785404 @default.
• W4250030116 hasAuthorship W4250030116A5056673838 @default.
• W4250030116 hasAuthorship W4250030116A5071440758 @default.
• W4250030116 hasAuthorship W4250030116A5086120093 @default.
• W4250030116 hasBestOaLocation W42500301161 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C160022790 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C2777714996 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C126322002 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C141071460 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C160022790 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C2776256026 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C2776478404 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C2777714996 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C71924100 @default.
• W4250030116 hasConceptScore W4250030116C95190672 @default.
• W4250030116 hasLocation W42500301161 @default.
• W4250030116 hasOpenAccess W4250030116 @default.
• W4250030116 hasPrimaryLocation W42500301161 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W2023952351 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W2053391223 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W206366597 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W2383868857 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W2389791149 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W2492225552 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W2537672043 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W2734975679 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W3125291531 @default.
• W4250030116 hasRelatedWork W99447445 @default.
• W4250030116 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4250030116 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4250030116 workType "article" @default.