FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4250664705> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4250664705 abstract "For many patients with head and neck cancer, oral nutrition will not provide adequate nourishment during treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy due to the acute toxicity of treatment, obstruction caused by the tumour, or both. The optimal method of enteral feeding for this patient group has yet to be established.To compare the effectiveness of different enteral feeding methods used in the nutritional management of patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy using the clinical outcomes, nutritional status, quality of life and rates of complications.Our extensive search included the Cochrane ENT Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and ISI Web of Science. The date of the most recent search was May 2009.Randomised controlled trials comparing one method of enteral feeding with another, e.g. nasogastric (NG) or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding, for adult patients with a diagnosis of head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy.Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data using standardised forms. We contacted study authors for additional information.One randomised controlled trial was eligible for inclusion in this review. However, a high degree of bias was identified in the study.Patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer, being treated with chemoradiotherapy, were randomised to PEG or NG feeding. In total only 33 patients were eligible for analysis as the trial was terminated early due to poor accrual.Weight loss was greater for the NG group at six weeks post-treatment than for the PEG group (P = 0.001). At six months post-treatment, however, there was no significant difference in weight loss between the two groups. Anthropometric measurements recorded six weeks post-treatment demonstrated lower triceps skin fold thickness for the NG group compared to the PEG group (P = 0.03). No statistically significant difference was found between the two different enteral feeding techniques in relation to complication rates or patient satisfaction. The duration of PEG feeding was significantly longer than for the NG group (P = 0.0006). In addition, the study calculated the cost of PEG feeding to be 10 times greater than that of NG, though this was not found to be significant. There was no difference in the treatment received by the two groups. However, four PEG fed patients and two NG fed patients required unscheduled treatment breaks of a median of two and six days respectively.We identified no studies of enteral feeding involving any form of radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) feeding or comparing prophylactic PEG versus PEG for inclusion in the review.There is not sufficient evidence to determine the optimal method of enteral feeding for patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy. Further trials of the two methods of enteral feeding, incorporating larger sample sizes, are required." @default.
• W4250664705 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4250664705 creator A5045474393 @default.
• W4250664705 creator A5048994559 @default.
• W4250664705 creator A5073133017 @default.
• W4250664705 date "2010-03-17" @default.
• W4250664705 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4250664705 title "Enteral feeding methods for nutritional management in patients with head and neck cancers being treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy" @default.
• W4250664705 cites W151034488 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W1598602811 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W1896114406 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W1982799708 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W1987288378 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W1988915643 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W1990446804 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W1999474247 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2003055420 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2011507865 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2020830322 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2021070501 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2024752286 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2038500596 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2046209970 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2050206200 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2050391762 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2050573779 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2052875260 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2052936423 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2074237655 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2080921324 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2085878853 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2089836215 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2091888491 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2094071257 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2097164197 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2116635176 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2122782524 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2124047443 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2153340330 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2160465774 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W2170433021 @default.
• W4250664705 cites W4296261240 @default.
• W4250664705 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007904.pub2" @default.
• W4250664705 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20238358" @default.
• W4250664705 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W4250664705 type Work @default.
• W4250664705 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052012 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052013 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052014 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052015 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052016 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052017 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052018 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052019 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052022 @default.
• W4250664705 countsByYear W42506647052023 @default.
• W4250664705 crossrefType "reference-entry" @default.
• W4250664705 hasAuthorship W4250664705A5045474393 @default.
• W4250664705 hasAuthorship W4250664705A5048994559 @default.
• W4250664705 hasAuthorship W4250664705A5073133017 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C2776530083 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C2777014482 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C2778424827 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C2780075904 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C44315111 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C54400483 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConcept C78722104 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C10138342 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C121608353 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C126322002 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C141071460 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C162324750 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C168563851 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C2776478404 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C2776530083 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C2777014482 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C2778424827 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C2780075904 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C44315111 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C509974204 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C54400483 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C71924100 @default.
• W4250664705 hasConceptScore W4250664705C78722104 @default.
• W4250664705 hasLocation W42506647051 @default.
• W4250664705 hasLocation W42506647052 @default.
• W4250664705 hasOpenAccess W4250664705 @default.
• W4250664705 hasPrimaryLocation W42506647051 @default.
• W4250664705 hasRelatedWork W1994431221 @default.
• W4250664705 hasRelatedWork W2031716646 @default.
• W4250664705 hasRelatedWork W2035968120 @default.

• next