FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4251256154> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4251256154 endingPage "1372" @default.
• W4251256154 startingPage "1368" @default.
• W4251256154 abstract "HomeRadioGraphicsVol. 20, No. 5 PreviousNext Invited CommentaryInvited CommentarySalil D. Sarkar, David N. SiegelSalil D. Sarkar, David N. SiegelAuthor Affiliations1Department of Radiology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New YorkSalil D. SarkarDavid N. SiegelPublished Online:Sep 1 2000https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se231368MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References 1 Martinez-Maldonado M. Pathophysiology of renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 1991; 17:707-719. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Pickering T. Renovascular hypertension: etiology and pathology. Semin Nucl Med 1989; 19:79-88. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Miyamori I, Shuichiro Y, Takeda Y, et al. Effects of converting enzyme inhibition on split renal function in renovascular hypertension. Hypertension 1986; 8:415-421. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar4 Hricik DE, Browning PJ, Kopelman R, et al. Captopril-induced functional renal insufficiency in patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis or renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney. N Engl J Med 1983; 308:373-376. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Davidson RA, Wilcox CS. Newer tests for the diagnosis of renovascular disease. JAMA 1992; 268:3353-3358. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Elliot WJ, Martin WB, Murphy MB. Comparison of two noninvasive screening tests for renovascular hypertension. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:755-764. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Roubidoux MA, Dunnick NR, Klotman PE, et al. Renal vein renins: inability to predict response to revascularization in patients with hypertension. Radiology 1991; 178:819-822. Link, Google Scholar8 Olin JW, Piedmont MR, Young JR, et al. The utility of duplex ultrasound scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122:833-838. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Kaplan-Pavlovcic S, Nadja C. Captopril renography and duplex Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13:313-317. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Stavros AT, Parker SH, Yakes WF, et al. Segmental stenosis of the renal artery: pattern recognition of tardus and parvus abnormalities with duplex sonography. Radiology 1992; 184:487-492. Link, Google Scholar11 van der Hulst VP, van Baalen J, Kool LS, et al. Renal artery stenosis: endovascular flow wire study for validation of Doppler US. Radiology 1996; 200:165-168. Link, Google Scholar12 Kliewer MA, Tupler RH, Hertzberg BS, et al. Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of waveform morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:1371-1376. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13 Bude RO, Rubin JM. Detection of renal artery stenosis with Doppler sonography: it is more complicated than originally thought. Radiology 1995; 196:612-613. Link, Google Scholar14 De Cobelli F, Mellone R, Salvioni M, et al. Renal artery stenosis: value of screening with three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with a phased-array multicoil. Radiology 1996; 201:697-703. Link, Google Scholar15 Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 202:333-338. Link, Google Scholar16 Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207:497-504. Link, Google Scholar17 Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV, et al. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing–independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology 1999; 211:667-679. Link, Google Scholar18 Leung DA, Hoffman U, Pfammatter T, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography versus duplex sonography for diagnosing renovascular disease. Hypertension 1999; 33:726-731. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Ghantous VE, Eisen TD, Sherman AH, et al. Evaluating patients with renal failure for renal artery stenosis with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33:36-42. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Holley KE, Hunt JC, Brown AL, et al. Renal artery stenosis: a clinical-pathologic study in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Am J Med 1964; 37:14-22. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Dustan HP, Humphries AW, de Wolfe VG, et al. Normal arterial pressure in patients with renal artery stenosis. JAMA 1964; 187:1028-1029. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Fine EJ, Sarkar SD. Differential diagnosis and management of renovascular hypertension through nuclear medicine techniques. Semin Nucl Med 1989; 19:101-115. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Sarkar SD. Captopril renography Pocket Lecture Series. Reston, Va: Society of Nuclear Medicine, 1994. Google Scholar24 Setaro JF, Saddler MC, Chen CC, et al. Simplified captopril renography in diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis. Hypertension 1991; 18:289-298. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar25 Fanti S, Dondi M, Barozzi L, et al. Detection of renal artery stenosis by means of captopril renal scintigraphy in patients with multiple renal arteries. Clin Nucl Med 1992; 17:849-852. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Taylor A, Eshima D, Christian PE, et al. Evaluation of Tc-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine in patients with impaired renal function. Radiology 1987; 162:365-370. Link, Google Scholar27 Blaufox MD, Middleton ML, Bongiovanni J, et al. Cost efficacy of the diagnosis and therapy of renovascular hypertension. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:171-177. Medline, Google Scholar28 Dondi M, Fanti S, De Fabritiis A, et al. Prognostic value of captopril renal scintigraphy in renovascular hypertension. J Nucl Med 1992; 33:2040-2044. Medline, Google Scholar29 Fommei E, Ghione S, Hilson AJ, et al. Captopril radionuclide test in renovascular hypertension: a European multicentre study. Eur J Nucl Med 1993; 20:617-623. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Meier GH, Sumpio B, Setaro JF, et al. Captopril renal scintigraphy: a new standard for predicting outcome after renal revascularization. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17:280-287. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Geyskes GG, de Bruyn AJ. Captopril renography and the effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on blood pressure in 94 patients with renal artery stenosis. Am J Hypertens 1991; 4(12 pt 2):685S-689S. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: Sept 2000 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByThe Pathophysiologic Basis of Nuclear MedicineSalil D.Sarkar, Pravin C.Singhal, Abdelhamid H.Elgazzar2015The Pathophysiologic Basis of Nuclear MedicineSalil D.Sarkar, Pravin C.Singhal2006Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 20, No. 5 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W4251256154 created "2022-05-12" @default.
• W4251256154 creator A5007948645 @default.
• W4251256154 creator A5048266835 @default.
• W4251256154 date "2000-09-01" @default.
• W4251256154 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4251256154 title "Invited Commentary" @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1510546098 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1969289591 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1971154749 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1972178282 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1976100394 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1989856711 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1989982763 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1991010288 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1993341388 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W1994195657 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2001707505 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2002107700 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2002389801 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2011391734 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2017421907 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2022234183 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2025028635 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2030142784 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2033591683 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2039552608 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2044013668 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2044861415 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2049491952 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2064213337 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2086524451 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2089143457 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2107823437 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2107929116 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2109550077 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2126183171 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2134968873 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2142748642 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2148957105 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2153517233 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2312259801 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W2319156768 @default.
• W4251256154 cites W4300907575 @default.
• W4251256154 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.5.g00se231368" @default.
• W4251256154 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10992025" @default.
• W4251256154 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W4251256154 type Work @default.
• W4251256154 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4251256154 countsByYear W42512561542014 @default.
• W4251256154 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4251256154 hasAuthorship W4251256154A5007948645 @default.
• W4251256154 hasAuthorship W4251256154A5048266835 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C2776634560 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C2781016617 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C2781243531 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C126322002 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C17744445 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C199539241 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C2776634560 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C2779473830 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C2780091579 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C2781016617 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C2781243531 @default.
• W4251256154 hasConceptScore W4251256154C71924100 @default.
• W4251256154 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4251256154 hasLocation W42512561541 @default.
• W4251256154 hasLocation W42512561542 @default.
• W4251256154 hasOpenAccess W4251256154 @default.
• W4251256154 hasPrimaryLocation W42512561541 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W1912112391 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W1969902885 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2036049010 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2050098546 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2053512341 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2074055518 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2257584331 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2393539839 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2418461573 @default.
• W4251256154 hasRelatedWork W2740931143 @default.
• W4251256154 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W4251256154 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4251256154 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4251256154 workType "article" @default.